Using 2D Motion Analysis to Identify Deviant Movement

Original Editor - User Name

Top Contributors - Merinda Rodseth, Kim Jackson, Jess Bell and Ewa Jaraczewska  

Introduction

Over the past decade, there has been a growing demand for precise and accurate methods to assess human movement (Roggio 2021). “Motion and posture analyses are effective tools used in diagnosis, therapy and prevention of musculoskeletal disorders” (Roggio 2021).

Analysing human movement and posture allows clinicians to observe movement execution and identify injury risk factors in order to make the best decisions to reduce the patient’s recovery time and implement effective treatment plans (Roggio 2021).

The focus of this page will be to identify and define key reference points useful to describe motion and deviant motion when performing 2D slow-motion video analysis.

Terminology

The denotation or definition of a word explains what the word explicitly means, while its connotation is what it implies or is associated with. The connotation is the emotional and cultural baggage that goes with the word and often carries a negative inference  – creating a nocebo effect.(Damien 2021)

The definition of deviation is “the action of departing from an established course or an accepted standard or deviation from a norm”.

The definition of dysfunction - is “not operating properly or normally”.

Dysfunction thereby carries a negative connotation, whereas the connotation of deviation is more neutral. Even though these words might be synonymous, describing something as “deviant” depicts a more positive approach and its use recommended.(Damien 2021)

Movement deviation is also synonymous with movement compensation. Movement deviations/compensations can be good or bad and can have positive or negative effects. Humans and animals alike will automatically or instinctively choose the best compensation to move in order to avoid pain and expend the least amount of energy based on the law of the path of least resistance. Compensatory movements occur at an unconscious level and may continue long after the original injury has healed and the pain alleviated because the movement has become habitual.(Damien 2021)

Compensatory movements may lead to additional problems or compensations and may in fact not be the best movement strategy for the patient. It might therefore be necessary at times to bring the unconscious compensation to a conscious level for the patient in order to establish if this compensation is indeed the best strategy for the patient. (Damien 2021)

The movement deviation/compensation may also be the best strategy for the patient at that specific time and they might want to continue with it. Whether this compensation should be altered needs to be established by the physiotherapist after assessing the patient and testing it. This brings us to the use of the words “correct” compared to “alter” when referring to movement deviations. (Damien 2021)

Correct – To put right

Alter – To change

Only after assessing the patient and establishing a working hypothesis can the decision be made why the compensation exists and if it is in fact ideal for the patient or if there are others available that should rather be considered. The working hypothesis will therefore determine if an intervention to alter the deviation or compensation is justified. It is, therefore, preferable to use the term “alter” rather than “correct” movement.(Damien 2021)

Key Reference Points

A reference point is needed to determine if something is in motion. Motion is described relative to the

• Position
• Speed
• Direction
• Acceleration

but it is key to have reference points.

There are some established key reference points that are useful when analysing motion to determine whether the movement is deviant or relatively normal.

Movement Relative to the Line of the Horizon

Using the line of the horizon as a reference point enables the clinician to observe costly upward accelerations/deflections of the Center of Mass (CoM) (Tesio 2019). The reference point is the CoM which has been shown to lie a few centimetres in front of the lumbosacral joint in quietly standing humans (Tesio 2019). Tracking the centre of mass during movement as with walking or running, is however much more complicated (Tesio 2019). Using the iliac crest as a surrogate for the CoM, vertical displacement is easily determined by comparing the highest point of the iliac crest during float to its lowest point during stance (Souza 2016). For runners, this vertical displacement of the CoM should be about 6-8 centimetres compared to around 9 cm in walkers (Damien 2021) (Perry book). Vertical displacement has important implications for injury mechanics and energy expenditure (Souza 2016, Devetak 2019) .

Movement Relative to the Line of Gravity or Vertical

Movement relative to the line of gravity is considered relative to the CoM. Viewing a patient from the side (sagittal view), the CoM is inferred to be at the greater trochanter (Damien 2021). With the greater trochanter as a body landmark, a vertical line (line of gravity) and a line bisecting the trunk is drawn to measure deviation of the trunk anteriorly or posteriorly (deviant from vertical).

Movement Relative to the Line of Progression down the Road or Track

Measuring along the line of progression allows for the measurement of the foot progression angle which can easily be made from the posterior view (Souza 2016). The foot progression angle can be defined as the angle between the foot axis and the direction of walking (Muller 2012). This longitudinal line bisecting the foot can be used to indicate whether the patient is running with toes out or toes in (Damien 2021). During toe-out, the lateral aspect of the shoe is visible from the posterior view whereas the big toe (first ray) and medial aspect of the shoe can be seen with toe-in progressions (Souza 2016).

Foot progression angle. Toe-out deviation of both feet in the stance and swing phase

Line of Gravity Relative to the Center of Mass

CoM is a parameter widely used in clinical and practical applications and provides useful information about the energy requirements of gait and as a descriptor of pathological gait (Jeong 2018).  Stability of the body is dependant on the relationship between the CoM and the base of support (BoS) (Devetak 2019). With the CoM lying a few centimetres in front of the lumbosacral joint in stance, a line through the sacrum is inferred to depict the CoM (Damien 2021, Jeong 2018). The CoM should remain within in base of support during the stance phase, with the line depicting the CoM passing through the sacrum (Damien 2021, Haddas 2019). The line of gravity therefore theoretically divides the body in half. During each step, the CoM oscillates laterally towards the weight-bearing leg, then swings back towards the opposite leg during the next step (Tesio 2019). Lateral displacement of the CoM is of particular clinical importance as it has been implicated in many pathological conditions and orthopaedic impairments (Tesio 2019).

Image on the left: stance phase left - line through sacrum also passes through the medial heel

Image on right: during stance phase right - the line from the medial heel passes to the left of the sacrum and 2/3rds of the mass including the head is to the right of the line of gravity

Movement Relative to a Joint axis

Using the point of maximum determination for joint range of motion (joint axis reference point) can also give an indication of symmetry by comparing it to the adjacent limb (Damien 2021).

In the image below, the picture on the left was captured with the left big toe in maximum dorsiflexion whereas the image on the right captured maximum dorsiflexion of the right big toe (views from the right and left sides of the treadmill). These images also enable us to make a comparison of symmetry between the two sides of the body as movement relative to an adjacent limb.

Movement Relative to the Adjacent Limb or Body Region

Movement can also be described as it relates to the adjacent body segment for example:

• the trunk shifting to the right but not the left
• A greater degree of trunk rotation to the left during gait compared to the right

Movement Relative to an External Object or Target

Hitting a target can also suffice as a point of reference for describing motion. For golf, the point of determination can be when the golf club hits the ball and it is at this point that the physiotherapist will analyse the golfers thoracic spine and hip position and movement compared to established norms.

For rock climbers, “hitting the target” infers the moment the climber grabs the rock or ledge and it is at this moment in time that the motion is analysed. In this instance, the external point (rock/ledge) is the point of reference.

Image on the left - point of determination is when the golf club hits the ball – notice spinal flexion and decreased hip flexion

The image on right can be captured when the left hand reaches the hand hold

Besides the reference points already discussed, motion can also be described relative to normative values and relative to the uninvolved side. (Damien 2021)

Frames of Reference useful to Describe Motion

Gait is one of the most commonly assessed human motions and refers to “the displacement of the centre of gravity during locomotion”. (Alharthi 2019). This is achieved in humans through the synchronised and coordinated movement of the trunk and the lower, resulting in a change in the body centre-of-mass position  (Alharthi 2019). Gait is characterised by repetitive cycles for each foot where each cycle can be divided into 2 phases: Stance phase with the foot in contact with the ground, and Swing phase with the foot off the ground (Alaharthi 2019, Shortland 2020), which brings us to the use of frames of reference for describing motion.

Frames of reference are useful for enhanced description, communication and analysis of motion. (Damien 2021) The following are examples of useful frames of reference:

1. The anatomical planes of the body

2. The phases of gait (Haddas 2018, Alathari 2019, Shortland 2020)

• Stance
• Swing
• Double support

Periods of the phases of gait

• Heel rocker - Foot strike, initial contact
• Ankle rocker - Midstance, weight acceptance
• Forefoot rocker - Terminal stance, heel off

3. Sport-specific agreed upon phases

Phases of a rowing stroke motion

Motion is described relative to the:

• Slide
• Catch of the oar
• Leg drive
• Finish

Phases of a golf swing

Describe the frame of reference relative to the:

• Backswing
• Downswing
• Follow-through

4. Symmetric versus asymmetric movement

• The assumption is the direction, magnitude, and speed of movement on the one side of the body should match or equal the movement on the other side of the body for the majority of activities observed.
• As a starting point, the reference limb is the more involved/painful limb and is considered deviant until proven otherwise.
• These assumptions deserve to be tested or challenged

In order to determine symmetry, it is important to define when the determination/comparison is made (point of determination). The point of determination for symmetry can be:

• When pain is elicited during movement
• During a phase or period of gait
  • Swing, stance, or double support
  • Heel rocker, ankle rocker, or forefoot rocker
• At the maximum deflection of range of motion for a joint between one side and the other
• At the maximum deviation of the centre of mass from the reference point or line of reference (line of progression, from vertical, from a horizontal line)
• At the point when the limb reaches the target, hits the golf ball, release the ball

Alternatively, to determining asymmetry, the analysis can compare the observed movement relative to normative data - the theoretical ideal movement.