The Assessment of Pain and Occupational Performance: Difference between revisions
Rachael Lowe (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Rachael Lowe (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 20: | Line 20: | ||
==== Reliability ==== | ==== Reliability ==== | ||
Gerd Perneros and Hans Tropp (2009) [http://www.sciencedirect.com/science?_ob=ArticleURL&_udi=B6W7P-4W55T09-1&_user=10&_coverDate=06%2F30%2F2009&_rdoc=1&_fmt=&_orig=search&_sort=d&view=c&_acct=C000050221&_version=1&_urlVersion=0&_userid=10&md5=77917553a64b7fe08dbfd1e67481f7dc Development, validity, and reliability of The Assessment of Pain and Occupational Performance (POP): a new instrument using two dimensions in the investigation of disability in back pain], The Spine Journal, 9(6), 486-498 | Gerd Perneros and Hans Tropp (2009) [http://www.sciencedirect.com/science?_ob=ArticleURL&_udi=B6W7P-4W55T09-1&_user=10&_coverDate=06%2F30%2F2009&_rdoc=1&_fmt=&_orig=search&_sort=d&view=c&_acct=C000050221&_version=1&_urlVersion=0&_userid=10&md5=77917553a64b7fe08dbfd1e67481f7dc Development, validity, and reliability of The Assessment of Pain and Occupational Performance (POP): a new instrument using two dimensions in the investigation of disability in back pain], The Spine Journal, 9(6), 486-498 | ||
==== Validity ==== | |||
Gerd Perneros and Hans Tropp (2009) [http://www.sciencedirect.com/science?_ob=ArticleURL&_udi=B6W7P-4W55T09-1&_user=10&_coverDate=06%2F30%2F2009&_rdoc=1&_fmt=&_orig=search&_sort=d&view=c&_acct=C000050221&_version=1&_urlVersion=0&_userid=10&md5=77917553a64b7fe08dbfd1e67481f7dc Development, validity, and reliability of The Assessment of Pain and Occupational Performance (POP): a new instrument using two dimensions in the investigation of disability in back pain], The Spine Journal, 9(6), 486-498 | |||
==== Responsiveness ==== | |||
==== Miscellaneous ==== | |||
== Contact == | |||
<div class="researchbox"> | |||
== Recent Related Research (from [http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/ Pubmed]) == | |||
Feed goes here!!|charset=UTF-8|short|max=10</div> | |||
== References == | |||
<references></ref> | |||
Revision as of 13:13, 26 May 2009
Original Editor - Your name will be added here if you created the original content for this page.
Lead Editors - Your name will be added here if you are a lead editor on this page. Read more.
Summary[edit | edit source]
The POP focuses on performance of activities. It is a disease-specific, discriminative assessment instrument designed for patients with back pain (BP) and LBP.
Intended Population[edit | edit source]
Adults with back pain and LBP
Reference[edit | edit source]
Gerd Perneros and Hans Tropp (2009) Development, validity, and reliability of The Assessment of Pain and Occupational Performance (POP): a new instrument using two dimensions in the investigation of disability in back pain, The Spine Journal, 9(6), 486-498[1]
Evidence[edit | edit source]
Reliability[edit | edit source]
Gerd Perneros and Hans Tropp (2009) Development, validity, and reliability of The Assessment of Pain and Occupational Performance (POP): a new instrument using two dimensions in the investigation of disability in back pain, The Spine Journal, 9(6), 486-498
Validity[edit | edit source]
Gerd Perneros and Hans Tropp (2009) Development, validity, and reliability of The Assessment of Pain and Occupational Performance (POP): a new instrument using two dimensions in the investigation of disability in back pain, The Spine Journal, 9(6), 486-498
Responsiveness[edit | edit source]
Miscellaneous[edit | edit source]
Contact[edit | edit source]
Recent Related Research (from Pubmed)[edit | edit source]
Feed goes here!!|charset=UTF-8|short|max=10References[edit | edit source]
<references></ref>
- ↑ Gerd Perneros and Hans Tropp (2009) Development, validity, and reliability of The Assessment of Pain and Occupational Performance (POP): a new instrument using two dimensions in the investigation of disability in back pain, The Spine Journal, 9(6), 486-498
