Template:Special Test: Difference between revisions

No edit summary
m (Corrected editor code)
 
(10 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
<div class="editorbox">
<div class="editorbox"> '''Original Editor '''- [[User:User Name|User Name]]<br>
'''Original Editor '''- Your name will be added here if you created the original content for this page.
'''Top Contributors''' - {{Special:Contributors/{{FULLPAGENAME}}}}</div>
== Purpose<br>  ==


'''Lead Editors''' - Your name will be added here if you are a lead editor on this page.&nbsp; [[Physiopedia:Editors|Read more.]]
add the purpose of this assessment technique here<br>  
</div>
== Purpose<br> ==


&nbsp;&nbsp; A decision rule used to determine the need for radiographs in acute knee injuries.
== Technique<br>  ==


== Technique<br> ==
Describe how to carry out this assessment technique here


&nbsp; The decision rule is applied to any patient presenting with an acute knee injury.&nbsp; If '''any '''of the 5 following findings are present, the patient should have radiographic examination.
== Evidence  ==


'''1.'''&nbsp; ''Age 55 or older''
Provide the evidence for this technique here
 
'''2.'''&nbsp; ''Isolated tenderness of the patella (no bone tenderness of knee other than patella)''
 
'''3.'''&nbsp; ''Tenderness of the head of the fibula''
 
'''4.'''&nbsp; ''Inability to flex to 90 degrees''
 
'''5.'''&nbsp; ''Inability to bear weight both immediately and in the emergency department for 4 steps&nbsp; (unable to transfer weight twice&nbsp;on&nbsp; each lower limb regardless of limping)''
 
== Evidence<ref>Stiell IG, Greenberg GH, Wells GA, McDowell I, Cwinn A, Smith NA, Cacciotti TF, Marco LA. Prospective validation of a Decision Rule for the use of Radiography in Acute Knee Injuries. JAMA. 1996;275:611-615</ref><br> ==
 
&nbsp; An estimated 1.3 million patients are seen annually in US emergency departments with acute knee trauma.<ref name="McCaig">McCaig LF. national Hospital Ambulatory Medial Care Survey: 1992 emergency department summary. Advance Data. 1994;245:1-12.</ref><ref>National Center for Health Statistics. National Hospital AmbulatoryMedical Care Survey 1992. Hyattsville, MD:National Center for Health Statistics; 1994.</ref>&nbsp; Although only 6% of these patients have suffered a fracture, the vast majority undergo plain radiography of the knee.<ref>Naational Center for Health Statistics. National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey 1992. Hyattsville, MD:National Center for health Statistics; 1994.</ref><ref name="Steill et al">Stiell IG, Wells GA, McDowell I, et al. Use of Radiography in acute knee injuries: need for clinical decision rules. Acad Emerg Med. 1995;2:966-973.</ref><ref name="Gleadhill et al">Gleadhill DNS, Thomson JY, Simms P. Can more efficient use be made of x-ray examinations in the accident and emergency department? BMJ. 1987;294;943-947.</ref><ref name="Gratton et al">Gratton MC, Salomone JA III, Watson WA. Clinically Significant radiograph misinterpretationsat an emergency medicine residency program. Ann Emerg Med. 1990;19:497-502.</ref><ref>McConnochie KM, Roghmann KJ, Pasternack J, Monroe DJ, Monaco LP. Prediction rules for selective radiographic assessment of extremity injuriesin children and adolescents. Pediatrics. 1990;86:45-57.</ref>&nbsp; More than 92% of these radiographic results are negative for fractures and exemplify the many low cost,&nbsp;but high volume tests that add to health care costs.<ref name="Moloney et al">Moloney TW, Rogers DE. Medical Technology: a different viewof the contentious debate over costs. N Eng J Med. 1979;301:1413-1419.</ref><ref name="Angell">Angell M. Cost containment and the physician. JAMA. 1985;254:1203-1207.</ref>&nbsp; The Ottawa knee&nbsp;decision rule was developed in an attempt to allow physicians to be more selective&nbsp;with radiography, without&nbsp;missing clinically important fractures.<ref name="Steill IG">Stiell IG, Greenberg GH, Wells GA, et al. Derivation of a decision rule for the use of radiography in acute knee injuries. Ann Emerg Med. 1995;26:405-413.</ref>&nbsp;&nbsp; A&nbsp;prospective study by Stiell, et al (1996),&nbsp;have found the rules to be 100% sensitive&nbsp;for identifying fractures of the knee&nbsp;with the potential relative reduction in the use of&nbsp;radiography to be estimated at 28%.&nbsp;


== Resources  ==
== Resources  ==


Ottawa Hospital Research Institute
add any relevant resources here
<div class="researchbox"></div>
 
== Recent Related Research (from [http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/ Pubmed])  ==


<rss>Feed goes here!!|charset=UTF-8|short|max=10</rss>
</div>
== References  ==
== References  ==


References will automatically be added here, see [[Adding References|adding references tutorial]].
<references />
 
<references /><br>

Latest revision as of 19:42, 5 May 2020

Purpose
[edit source]

add the purpose of this assessment technique here

Technique
[edit source]

Describe how to carry out this assessment technique here

Evidence[edit source]

Provide the evidence for this technique here

Resources[edit source]

add any relevant resources here

References[edit source]