Patient Global Impression of Improvement (PGI-I): Difference between revisions
Kirsten Ryan (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Kirsten Ryan (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 19: | Line 19: | ||
=== Validity === | === Validity === | ||
The PGI-I was found to have excellent construct validity. The assessment variables included incontinence episode frequency, the Incontinence Quality of Life Questionnaire results, and fixed volume (400 mL) stress pad test results. The category differences for all variables was highly significant (P< .0001). | |||
=== Responsiveness === | === Responsiveness === | ||
Revision as of 00:44, 6 February 2011
Original Editor - Your name will be added here if you created the original content for this page.
Lead Editors - Your name will be added here if you are a lead editor on this page. Read more.
Objective
[edit | edit source]
Intended Population
[edit | edit source]
The PGI-I has only been tested on women with stress urinary incontinence. It has not been established to be applicable for men and women with other lower urinary tract symptoms or conditions.
Method of Use[edit | edit source]
Reference
[edit | edit source]
Evidence[edit | edit source]
Reliability[edit | edit source]
Validity[edit | edit source]
The PGI-I was found to have excellent construct validity. The assessment variables included incontinence episode frequency, the Incontinence Quality of Life Questionnaire results, and fixed volume (400 mL) stress pad test results. The category differences for all variables was highly significant (P< .0001).
Responsiveness[edit | edit source]
Miscellaneous
[edit | edit source]
Links[edit | edit source]
Recent Related Research (from Pubmed)[edit | edit source]
Extension:RSS -- Error: Not a valid URL: Feed goes here!!|charset=UTF-8|short|max=10
References[edit | edit source]
References will automatically be added here, see adding references tutorial.
