Neurological Assessment: Difference between revisions

No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
<div class="noeditbox">
 
</div>
</div>
<div class="editorbox"> '''Original Editor '''- [[User:User Name|Kim Jackson]] '''Top Contributors''' - {{Special:Contributors/{{FULLPAGENAME}}}}</div>
<div class="editorbox"> '''Original Editor '''- [[User:User Name|Kim Jackson]] '''Top Contributors''' - {{Special:Contributors/{{FULLPAGENAME}}}}</div>

Revision as of 08:19, 3 April 2021

Introduction[edit | edit source]

In order to provide the best care and plan the best treatment a thorough assessment must be undertaken. It is the most important step in the rehabilitation process, helps to guide our clinical reasoning and decision when making informed decisions about the rehabilitation process. Johnson & Thompson (1996) outlined that treatment can only be as good as the assessment on which it was based[1]. So in order for us to progress and manage our treatment plan and ensure we are identifying out patients problems the assessment should be an ongoing and continuous process. A neurological assessment focuses on the nervous system to assess and identify any abnormalities that affect function and activities of daily living. It should allow us to create individual, patient-centred goals and ultimately a tailor-made treatment plan based on the client's needs.

So for the proper neurological assessment, we can use a SOAP format as a guide.

Subjective Assessment[edit | edit source]

The subjective assessment is used to provide a detailed picture of how the present condition affects the patient. 

Demographic Data[edit | edit source]

Name, Age, Gender, Occupation, Dominant hand, Address

Chief Complain[edit | edit source]

What is his/her present complaint or problem for which they have visited you?

History of Present Condition[edit | edit source]

  • Progression of the Condition
  • Date of Onset of Signs & Symptoms
  • Medical Management
  • Medical Observations
  • Other management
  • Previous Therapy
  • Results of Specific Investigations (X-rays, CT Scans, Blood Tests)

Past Medical History [edit | edit source]

  • Co-morbidities and other non-related conditions
  • Special Equipment, Technology Dependency
  • Previous Surgery
  • Medication History
  • History of any allergies

Personal History[edit | edit source]

Marital status, occupation,

Activity

  • Normal Daily Routine
  • Employment
  • Leisure Activities
  • Smoking and drinking habits

Mobility

  • General
  • Indoor
  • Outdoor
  • Steps & Stairs
  • Falls

Personal Care

  • Washing
  • Continence
  • Dressing

Other

  • Vision
  • Hearing
  • Swallowing
  • Fatigue
  • Pain
  • Perceptions of own Problems/Main Concern
  • Expectations of Treatment

Family History[edit | edit source]

Total number of family members, his/her primary caretaker,

Socioeconomic History[edit | edit source]

  • Family income source
  • Relationship with community people
  • Social Situation
  • Family Support
  • Accommodation
  • Social Service Support

Objective Assessment[edit | edit source]

On Observation[edit | edit source]

  1. Built
  2. Gait
  3. Pattern of Movement
  4. Mode of Ventilation
  5. Type/ Pattern of Respiration
  6. Oedema
  7. Muscle Wasting
  8. Pressure Sores
  9. Deformity
  10. Wounds
  11. External Appliances
  12. Posture and Balance
  • Alignment and attitude of limbs
  • Neglect
  • Sitting Balance
  • Standing Balance

Vital Signs[edit | edit source]

Respiratory rate

Temperature

Pulse rate

Blood pressure

O2 saturation

On Examination[edit | edit source]

Higher mental function[edit | edit source]

Level of consciousness: Glasscow coma scale (GCS)[edit | edit source]
Communication:[edit | edit source]

Aphasia ( Broca's, Wernicke's, Global)

Cognition:[edit | edit source]
  • Orientation:
    • Person:
    • Place:
    • Time:
  • Calculation:
  • Registration:
  • Attention:
  • Proverb Interpretation:
  • Memory:
    • Immediate:
    • Recent:
    • Remote:
    • Verbal:
    • Visual:
  • Language
  • Visuospatial proficiency

There are various outcome tools via which we can address his/her cognitive status incorporating various components.

Perception:[edit | edit source]
  • Body Scheme/ Body Imaging
  • Agnosias/ Apraxias:

Common tools to assess perceptual problems are:

  • Star Cancellation Test.
  • Line Bisection Test.
  • Clock Drawing Test.

Voluntary Movement[edit | edit source]

  • Range of Movement
  • Strength
  • Endurance
  • Coordination 
    Finger to Nose Test
    Heel to Shin Test
    Rapidly Alternating Movement

Involuntary Movement[edit | edit source]

  • Tremor
  • Clonus
  • Chorea
  • Associated Reactions

Tone[edit | edit source]

  • Decreased / Flaccid
  • Increased
    Spasticity (Clasp-knife)
    Rigidity (Cogwheel or Lead Pipe)

Reflexes[edit | edit source]

  • Deep Tendon Reflexes
    Biceps (C5/6)
    Triceps (C7/8)
    Knee (L3/4)
    Ankle (S1/2)
  • Plantar Response (Babinski’s Sign)

Babinski Sign Test video provided by Clinically Relevant

Sensory[edit | edit source]

  • Light Touch
  • Pin Prick
  • Two Point Discrimination
  • Vibration Sense
  • Joint Position Sense
  • Temperature
  • Vision and Hearing

Functional Activities[edit | edit source]

  • Bed Mobility
  • Sitting Balance
  • Transfers
  • Upper Limb Function
  • Mobility
  • Stairs

Gait[edit | edit source]

  • Pattern
  • Distance
  • Velocity
  • Use of Walking Aids
  • Orthoses
  • Assistance
  • Cognitive Status
  • Attention
  • Orientation
  • Memory

References[edit | edit source]

  1. Johnson J, Thompson AJ. Rehabilitation in a neuroscience centre: the role of expert assessment and selection. British Journal of Therapy and Rehabilitation. 1996 Jun;3(6):303-8.