Movement Control Tests For Lumbar Spine: Difference between revisions

No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 2: Line 2:


== Introduction ==
== Introduction ==
Meier, R., et al. "Sensorimotor and body perception assessments of nonspecific chronic low back pain: a cross-sectional study." BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders 22.1 (2021): 1-10.<ref>Meier R, Emch C, Gross-Wolf C, Pfeiffer F, Meichtry A, Schmid A, Luomajoki H. [https://bmcmusculoskeletdisord.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12891-021-04269-7 Sensorimotor and body perception assessments of nonspecific chronic low back pain: a cross-sectional study.] BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders. 2021 Dec;22(1):1-0.</ref>
The movement control tests aren’t magical, but should be considered without other larger impairments. They can be used as asterisk signs in some cases when there sufficient progress isn’t being made it may be a significant impairment. What is not tested is how these compare to posterior chain strengthening or aerobic conditioning, both of which have been shown to improve low back pain. Further, biomedical impairments should always be graded against psychological and social “impairments”.  


This research evaluated whether there was a difference between people in pain and people without pain. For each positive test on the movement control tests there was an odds ratio of 1.92 more likely to have chronic low back pain.  
Some patients may benefit by knowing the impairments found and others may not. This is discretionary. It depends on how much the patient needs to know why they are in pain and the purpose of your interventions. Too much information can be nocebic, but insufficient information can be frustrating. Good questioning will elicit patient concerns so you know what needs to be addressed.
 
Tests<ref>Alrwaily M, Timko M, Schneider M, Stevans J, Bise C, Hariharan K, Delitto A. [https://academic.oup.com/ptj/article/96/7/1057/2864925 Treatment-based classification system for low back pain: revision and update.] Physical therapy. 2016 Jul 1;96(7):1057-66.</ref> are considered positive if with cueing and demonstration the person can not perform correctly<ref name=":0">Lehtola V, Luomajoki H, Leinonen V, Gibbons S, Airaksinen O. [https://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12891-016-0986-y Sub-classification based specific movement control exercises are superior to general exercise in sub-acute low back pain when both are combined with manual therapy: A randomized controlled trial.] BMC musculoskeletal disorders. 2016 Dec;17(1):1-9.</ref>.  
 
ARTICLES


Khodadad, Behrouz, et al. "Comparing the effectiveness of cognitive functional treatment and lumbar stabilization treatment on pain and movement control in patients with low back pain." Sports health 12.3 (2020): 289-295.<ref>Khodadad B, Letafatkar A, Hadadnezhad M, Shojaedin S. [https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/1941738119886854 Comparing the effectiveness of cognitive functional treatment and lumbar stabilization treatment on pain and movement control in patients with low back pain.] Sports Health. 2020 May;12(3):289-95.</ref>
This research evaluated whether there was a difference between people in pain and people without pain. For each positive test on the movement control tests there was an odds ratio of 1.92 more likely to have chronic low back pain.<ref>Meier R, Emch C, Gross-Wolf C, Pfeiffer F, Meichtry A, Schmid A, Luomajoki H. [https://bmcmusculoskeletdisord.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12891-021-04269-7 Sensorimotor and body perception assessments of nonspecific chronic low back pain: a cross-sectional study.] BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders. 2021 Dec;22(1):1-0.</ref>  


Both the CFT and stabilization training improved pain and the MCT tests.  
Both the cognitive functional treatment and lumbar stabilization treatment improved pain and the movement control tests.<ref>Khodadad B, Letafatkar A, Hadadnezhad M, Shojaedin S. [https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/1941738119886854 Comparing the effectiveness of cognitive functional treatment and lumbar stabilization treatment on pain and movement control in patients with low back pain.] Sports Health. 2020 May;12(3):289-95.</ref>


The CFT group class sessions involved education, exercise, and relaxation/mindfulness.
The CFT group class sessions involved education, exercise, and relaxation/mindfulness.
Line 14: Line 18:
Stabilization group received cues on how to properly control the spine during the following exercises which were held for 3 seconds: A) planks. (B) bridge. (C) bird-dog. (D) side bridge, and (E) curl-up.  
Stabilization group received cues on how to properly control the spine during the following exercises which were held for 3 seconds: A) planks. (B) bridge. (C) bird-dog. (D) side bridge, and (E) curl-up.  


Lehtola, Vesa, et al. "Sub-classification based specific movement control exercises are superior to general exercise in sub-acute low back pain when both are combined with manual therapy: A randomized controlled trial." BMC musculoskeletal disorders 17.1 (2016): 1-9.<ref name=":0" />
Motor control exercises improved disability more than specific exercise at 3 and 12 month follow-up. This was evident on the RMDQ which is more sensitive for mild-moderate back pain than the ODI.<ref name=":0" />  
 
Motor control exercises improved disability more than specific exercise at 3 and 12 month follow-up. This was evident on the RMDQ which is more sensitive for mild-moderate back pain than the ODI.  
 
This is motor control exercises, not stabilization. It is “specific” instead of general. They give pictures of each of the specific and general exercises.The details of the specific exercises are not clear, but the goal was to train movements in different positions and how to move and control their lumbar spine in relation to their hips and thoracic spine. The general exercises are common core exercises. Both of these groups are very similar to Koumantakis’ article in 2005. The major difference is that in this current research they screened for who psychosocial limiting factors and for those positive on at least 2 of the movement control tests which explains the difference in their results.
 
Nick’s summary: The movement control tests aren’t magical, but should be considered without other larger impairments. They can be used as asterisk signs in some cases when there sufficient progress isn’t being made it may be a significant impairment. What is not tested is how these compare to posterior chain strengthening or aerobic conditioning, both of which have been shown to improve low back pain. Further, biomedical impairments should always be graded against psychological and social “impairments”.
 
Some patients may benefit by knowing the impairments found and others may not. This is discretionary. It depends on how much the patient needs to know why they are in pain and the purpose of your interventions. Too much information can be nocebic, but insufficient information can be frustrating. Good questioning will elicit patient concerns so you know what needs to be addressed.
 
Tests<ref>Alrwaily M, Timko M, Schneider M, Stevans J, Bise C, Hariharan K, Delitto A. [https://academic.oup.com/ptj/article/96/7/1057/2864925 Treatment-based classification system for low back pain: revision and update.] Physical therapy. 2016 Jul 1;96(7):1057-66.</ref> are considered positive if with cueing and demonstration the person can not perform correctly<ref name=":0">Lehtola V, Luomajoki H, Leinonen V, Gibbons S, Airaksinen O. [https://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12891-016-0986-y Sub-classification based specific movement control exercises are superior to general exercise in sub-acute low back pain when both are combined with manual therapy: A randomized controlled trial.] BMC musculoskeletal disorders. 2016 Dec;17(1):1-9.</ref>.


* Sub-acute or chronic non-specific mechanical low back pain
This is motor control exercises, not stabilization. It is “specific” instead of general. They give pictures of each of the specific and general exercises.The details of the specific exercises are not clear, but the goal was to train movements in different positions and how to move and control their lumbar spine in relation to their hips and thoracic spine. The general exercises are common core exercises. Both of these groups are very similar to Koumantakis’ article<ref>Koumantakis GA, Watson PJ, Oldham JA. [[Trunk muscle stabilization training plus general exercise versus general exercise only: randomized controlled trial of patients with recurrent low back pain.]] Physical therapy. 2005 Mar 1;85(3):209-25.</ref> in 2005. The major difference is that in this current research they screened for who psychosocial limiting factors and for those positive on at least 2 of the movement control tests which explains the difference in their results.
* Those who could fit in the “motor control impairment” continuum proposed by Alrwaily. However, these may be considered with those with a sensitized neurologic structure or joint mobility/flexibility impairment as it is not contraindicated and the amount of impairment of each of these should be graded and movement control could be treated while addressing those others before they are resolved.  
* Movement Control Abilities Questionnaire < 80 (Sean Gibbon said it’s copyrighted and no information on how to obtain it) (MCAQ was created based off of 31 patients who didn’t progress with motor control exercises as a way to screen out who won’t improve)


== Six Movement Control Tests ==
== Six Movement Control Tests ==


===== 1. Waiter’s Bow:<ref>Luomajoki H, Kool J, De Bruin ED, Airaksinen O. [https://bmcmusculoskeletdisord.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/1471-2474-8-90 Reliability of movement control tests in the lumbar spine.] BMC musculoskeletal disorders. 2007 Dec;8(1):1-1.</ref> =====
===== 1. Waiter’s Bow: =====
'''Correct''': Forward bending of the hips 50-70°  without flexion of the low back.
'''Correct''': Forward bending of the hips 50-70°  without flexion of the low back.<ref name=":1">Luomajoki H, Kool J, De Bruin ED, Airaksinen O. [https://bmcmusculoskeletdisord.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/1471-2474-8-90 Reliability of movement control tests in the lumbar spine.] BMC musculoskeletal disorders. 2007 Dec;8(1):1-1.</ref>  


'''Incorrect''': Flexion occurring in the low back prior to 50° of hip flexion.
'''Incorrect''': Flexion occurring in the low back prior to 50° of hip flexion.<ref name=":1" />
[[File:Waiters Bow.webp|center|frameless]]
<ref name=":1" />


===== 2. Sitting Knee Extension: =====
===== 2. Sitting Knee Extension: =====
'''Correct''': Upright sitting with lumbar lordosis; extension of the knee to within 50° of straight without movement of LB.
'''Correct''': Upright sitting with lumbar lordosis; extension of the knee to within 50° of straight without movement of LB.<ref name=":1" />


'''Incorrect''': Low back moving in flexion prior to within 50° of straight.  
'''Incorrect''': Low back moving in flexion prior to within 50° of straight.  <ref name=":1" />
[[File:Sitting Knee Extension.webp|center|frameless]]
<ref name=":1" />


===== 3. Rocking backwards: =====
===== 3. Rocking Backwards: =====
'''Correct''': 120° of hip flexion without movement of the low back by transferring pelvis backwards.
'''Correct''': 120° of hip flexion without movement of the low back by transferring pelvis backwards.<ref name=":1" />


'''Incorrect''': Hip flexion causes flexion in the lumbar spine (typically the patient not aware of this).  
'''Incorrect''': Hip flexion causes flexion in the lumbar spine (typically the patient not aware of this).<ref name=":1" />
[[File:Rocking Backwards.webp|center|frameless]]
<ref name=":1" />


===== 4. Prone Lying Knee Flexion: =====
===== 4. Prone Lying Knee Flexion: =====
'''Correct''': Active knee flexion at least 90° without extension movement of the low back and pelvis.  
'''Correct''': Active knee flexion at least 90° without extension movement of the low back and pelvis.<ref name=":1" />


'''Incorrect''': Low back does not stay neutral, but moves into extension
'''Incorrect''': Low back does not stay neutral, but moves into extension<ref name=":1" />
[[File:Prone lying knee flexion.webp|center|frameless]]
<ref name=":1" />


===== 5. Posterior Pelvic Tilt: =====
===== 5. Posterior Pelvic Tilt: =====
'''Correct''': Posterior pelvic tilt the pelvis while in standing by contracting the glute max while keeping the thoracic spine in neutral
'''Correct''': Posterior pelvic tilt the pelvis while in standing by contracting the glute max while keeping the thoracic spine in neutral<ref name=":1" />


'''Incorrect''': Pelvis doesn't tilt or low back moves towards Ext./No gluteal activity/compensatory flexion in thoracic spine
'''Incorrect''': Pelvis doesn't tilt or low back moves towards Ext./No gluteal activity/compensatory flexion in thoracic spine<ref name=":1" />
[[File:Dorsal tilt of pelvis.webp|center|frameless]]
<ref name=":1" />


===== 6. Single-leg Stance: =====
===== 6. Single-leg Stance: =====
Setup: Patient’s feet 12cm apart. Use a 20cm ruler and hold it on a stable object with the middle of the ruler lined up with the patient's umbilicus.  
'''Setup:''' Patient’s feet 12cm apart. Use a 20cm ruler and hold it on a stable object with the middle of the ruler lined up with the patient's umbilicus.<ref name=":1" />


'''Correct''': The patient’s umbilicus has <2cm difference side to side and <10 cm transfer on either foot.  
'''Correct''': The patient’s umbilicus has <2cm difference side to side and <10 cm transfer on either foot.<ref name=":1" />


'''Incorrect''': Lateral transfer of belly button >2cm difference side to side or > 10 cm in either direction .
'''Incorrect''': Lateral transfer of belly button >2cm difference side to side or > 10 cm in either direction .<ref name=":1" />
[[File:Single leg stance.webp|center|frameless]]
<ref name=":1" />


== Articles: ==
== Articles: ==

Revision as of 12:25, 12 January 2023

Original Editor - Carin Hunter based on the course by Nick Rainey
Top Contributors - Carin Hunter, Rishika Babburu and Jess Bell

Introduction[edit | edit source]

The movement control tests aren’t magical, but should be considered without other larger impairments. They can be used as asterisk signs in some cases when there sufficient progress isn’t being made it may be a significant impairment. What is not tested is how these compare to posterior chain strengthening or aerobic conditioning, both of which have been shown to improve low back pain. Further, biomedical impairments should always be graded against psychological and social “impairments”.

Some patients may benefit by knowing the impairments found and others may not. This is discretionary. It depends on how much the patient needs to know why they are in pain and the purpose of your interventions. Too much information can be nocebic, but insufficient information can be frustrating. Good questioning will elicit patient concerns so you know what needs to be addressed.

Tests[1] are considered positive if with cueing and demonstration the person can not perform correctly[2].

ARTICLES

This research evaluated whether there was a difference between people in pain and people without pain. For each positive test on the movement control tests there was an odds ratio of 1.92 more likely to have chronic low back pain.[3]

Both the cognitive functional treatment and lumbar stabilization treatment improved pain and the movement control tests.[4]

The CFT group class sessions involved education, exercise, and relaxation/mindfulness.

Stabilization group received cues on how to properly control the spine during the following exercises which were held for 3 seconds: A) planks. (B) bridge. (C) bird-dog. (D) side bridge, and (E) curl-up.

Motor control exercises improved disability more than specific exercise at 3 and 12 month follow-up. This was evident on the RMDQ which is more sensitive for mild-moderate back pain than the ODI.[2]

This is motor control exercises, not stabilization. It is “specific” instead of general. They give pictures of each of the specific and general exercises.The details of the specific exercises are not clear, but the goal was to train movements in different positions and how to move and control their lumbar spine in relation to their hips and thoracic spine. The general exercises are common core exercises. Both of these groups are very similar to Koumantakis’ article[5] in 2005. The major difference is that in this current research they screened for who psychosocial limiting factors and for those positive on at least 2 of the movement control tests which explains the difference in their results.

Six Movement Control Tests[edit | edit source]

1. Waiter’s Bow:[edit | edit source]

Correct: Forward bending of the hips 50-70°  without flexion of the low back.[6]

Incorrect: Flexion occurring in the low back prior to 50° of hip flexion.[6]

Waiters Bow.webp

[6]

2. Sitting Knee Extension:[edit | edit source]

Correct: Upright sitting with lumbar lordosis; extension of the knee to within 50° of straight without movement of LB.[6]

Incorrect: Low back moving in flexion prior to within 50° of straight.  [6]

Sitting Knee Extension.webp

[6]

3. Rocking Backwards:[edit | edit source]

Correct: 120° of hip flexion without movement of the low back by transferring pelvis backwards.[6]

Incorrect: Hip flexion causes flexion in the lumbar spine (typically the patient not aware of this).[6]

Rocking Backwards.webp

[6]

4. Prone Lying Knee Flexion:[edit | edit source]

Correct: Active knee flexion at least 90° without extension movement of the low back and pelvis.[6]

Incorrect: Low back does not stay neutral, but moves into extension[6]

Prone lying knee flexion.webp

[6]

5. Posterior Pelvic Tilt:[edit | edit source]

Correct: Posterior pelvic tilt the pelvis while in standing by contracting the glute max while keeping the thoracic spine in neutral[6]

Incorrect: Pelvis doesn't tilt or low back moves towards Ext./No gluteal activity/compensatory flexion in thoracic spine[6]

Dorsal tilt of pelvis.webp

[6]

6. Single-leg Stance:[edit | edit source]

Setup: Patient’s feet 12cm apart. Use a 20cm ruler and hold it on a stable object with the middle of the ruler lined up with the patient's umbilicus.[6]

Correct: The patient’s umbilicus has <2cm difference side to side and <10 cm transfer on either foot.[6]

Incorrect: Lateral transfer of belly button >2cm difference side to side or > 10 cm in either direction .[6]

Single leg stance.webp

[6]

Articles:[edit | edit source]

References[edit | edit source]

  1. Alrwaily M, Timko M, Schneider M, Stevans J, Bise C, Hariharan K, Delitto A. Treatment-based classification system for low back pain: revision and update. Physical therapy. 2016 Jul 1;96(7):1057-66.
  2. 2.0 2.1 Lehtola V, Luomajoki H, Leinonen V, Gibbons S, Airaksinen O. Sub-classification based specific movement control exercises are superior to general exercise in sub-acute low back pain when both are combined with manual therapy: A randomized controlled trial. BMC musculoskeletal disorders. 2016 Dec;17(1):1-9.
  3. Meier R, Emch C, Gross-Wolf C, Pfeiffer F, Meichtry A, Schmid A, Luomajoki H. Sensorimotor and body perception assessments of nonspecific chronic low back pain: a cross-sectional study. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders. 2021 Dec;22(1):1-0.
  4. Khodadad B, Letafatkar A, Hadadnezhad M, Shojaedin S. Comparing the effectiveness of cognitive functional treatment and lumbar stabilization treatment on pain and movement control in patients with low back pain. Sports Health. 2020 May;12(3):289-95.
  5. Koumantakis GA, Watson PJ, Oldham JA. Trunk muscle stabilization training plus general exercise versus general exercise only: randomized controlled trial of patients with recurrent low back pain. Physical therapy. 2005 Mar 1;85(3):209-25.
  6. 6.00 6.01 6.02 6.03 6.04 6.05 6.06 6.07 6.08 6.09 6.10 6.11 6.12 6.13 6.14 6.15 6.16 6.17 6.18 Luomajoki H, Kool J, De Bruin ED, Airaksinen O. Reliability of movement control tests in the lumbar spine. BMC musculoskeletal disorders. 2007 Dec;8(1):1-1.