Movement Assessment Battery for Children

This article or area is currently under construction and may only be partially complete. Please come back soon to see the finished work! (20/11/2023)
Original Editor - User Name
Top Contributors - Romy Hageman and Carina Therese Magtibay

Purpose[edit | edit source]

The Movement Assessment Battery for Children (MABC) consists of a checklist and a motor test, both aimed at gauging a child's motor skills in everyday activities. This assessment measures three key motor skill aspects: manual dexterity, ball skills, and balance[1].

  • Target audience: Children (aged 3-17 years old) with potential motor skill deviations.
  • Purpose: The MABC-2 assists in identifying deficits in motor development at an early stage, determining the motor skill level, and planning targeted therapeutic interventions.

Technique[edit | edit source]

There are three age groups (3;0 to 6;11 years, 7;0 to 10;11 years, and 11;0 to 16;11 years). For each age group, a seperate test battery is available, with the level of difficulty increasing based on age:

  • Subtest age group 1 (3;0 to 6;11 years):
    • Manual dexterity 1: Coin insertion: The task is to pick up 6 or 12 plastic coins from the table and insert them through a narrow slot into a plastic box.
    • Manual dexterity 2: Bead threading: The task involves threading 6 or 12 plastic beads onto a string.
    • Manual dexterity 3: Tracing path: The task is to trace the route between two lines without exceeding the boundaries.
    • Ball skills 1: Catching a beanbag: The child is tasked with catching a beanbag.
    • Ball skills 2: Tossing beanbags: The task is to throw the beanbag on the mat.
    • Balance skills 1: Single-leg balance: The task is to maintain balance on one leg.
    • Balance skills 2: Toe-walking: The child must walk along a line without letting the raised heel touch the ground.
    • Balance skills 3: Jumping on mats: The child must jump from a standing position with legs together from mat to mat.
  • Subtest age group 2: (7;0 to 10;11 years):
    • Manual dexterity 1: Placing pegs: The task is to insert small plastic pegs as quickly as possible into a board.
    • Manual dexterity 2: Threading a string: The task is to pull a string through the holes of a plastic board.
    • Manual dexterity 3: Tracing path: The task is to trace the route between two lines without exceeding the boundaries.
    • Ball Skills 1: Catching: The child must throw a tennis ball against the wall and catch it with both hands.
    • Ball skills 2: Throwing: The child must aim the beanbag into the red circle on a mat.
    • Balance skills 1: Single-board balance: The child must balance on one foot on the balance board.
    • Balance skills 2: Heel to toe: The child must walk along the line while the heel of one foot touches the toes of the other foot.
    • Balance skills 3: Hopscotch: The child must jump forward on one leg from mat to mat starting from a standing position.
  • Subtest age group 3 (11;0 to 16;11 years):
    • Manual dexterity 1: Turning plugs: The task is to flip small two-colored plastic plugs so that the other colors faces upward.
    • Manual dexterity 2: Building a triangle: The task is to assemble three plastics together with nuts and bolts to create a triangle.
    • Manual decterity 3: Tracing path: The task is to trace the route between two lines without exceeding the boundaries.
    • Ball skills 1: Catching: The child must throw a tennis ball against the wall and then catch it with one hand.
    • Ball skills 2: Throwing: The task is to throw the tennis ball into a red circle on the wall.
    • Balance skills 1: Two-board balance: The child must balance on the balance board, ensuring that the heel of one foot and the toes of the other foot touch.
    • Balance skills 2: Walking backwards heel to toe: The child must walk backwards along a line, making sure that the toes of one foot touch the heel of the other.
    • Balance skills 3: Zigzag hopping: The task is to jump diagonally from one mat to another on one leg.

Scoring[edit | edit source]

Scores are drived using specific forms, and the cumulative scores from each aspect contribute to an overall score. The norms are provided for the three age groups.


Evidence[edit | edit source]

The MABC has been shown to have evidence of concurrent validity with other pediatric motor assessments[2] [3]and is extensively utilized internationally[4][5][6][7][8][9]. Norms have been assessed through studies conducted in diverse cultural settings, including Japan[10], Hong Kong[11] , Netherlands [3], Singapore[12]and Sweden[13].

The MABC can identify children with motor impairment issues better than the Bruininks-Oseretsky Test of Motor Proficiency (BOTMP)[14].

The MABC has been used in studies involving a range of different developmental conditions, such as:

  • Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD)[15][16][17].
  • Autistic Spectrum Disorders (ASD)[18][19].
  • Language impairment[20]

Resources[edit | edit source]

add any relevant resources here

References[edit | edit source]

  1. Henderson, S. E., Sugden, D. A., & Barnett, A. L. (2007). Movement assessment battery for children-2 second edition [Movement ABC-2]. London, UK: The Psychological Corporation.
  2. Missiuna, C., Rivard, L., & Bartlett, D. (2006). Exploring assessment tools and the target intervention for children with Developmental Coordination Disorder. Physical & Occupational Therapy in Pediatrics, 26(1/2), 71–89.
  3. 3.0 3.1 Smits-Engelsman, B. C. M., Henderson, S. E., & Michels, C. G. J. (1998). The assessment of children with developmental coordination disorders in the Netherlands: The relationship between the movement assessment battery for children and the Korperkoordinations Test fur Kinder. Human Movement Science, 17, 699– 709
  4. Chow, S. M. K., & Henderson, S. E. (2003). Brief report—Interrater and test-retest reliability of the movement assessment battery for Chinese preschool children. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 57(5), 574–577.
  5. Chow, S., Hsu, Y., Henderson, S., Barnett, A., & Lo, S. (2006). The Movement ABC: A cross-cultural comparison of preschool children from Hong Kong, Taiwan and the USA. Adapted Physical Activity Quarterly, 23(3), 31–48.
  6. Croce, R. V., Horvat, M., & McCarthy, E. (2001). Reliability and concurrent validity of the Movement Assessment Battery for Children. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 93, 275–280.
  7. Geuze, R. H., Jongmans, M. J., Schoemaker, M. M., & Smits-Engelsman, B. C. M. (2001). Clinical and research diagnostic criteria for developmental coordination disorder: A review and discussion. Human Movement Science, 20, 7– 47.
  8. Tan, S. W., Parker, H. E., & Larkin, D. (2001). Concurrent validity of motor tests used to identify children with motor impairment. Adapted Physical Activity Quarterly, 18, 168–182.
  9. Wiart, L., & Darrah, J. (2001). Review of four tests of gross motor development. Developmental Medicine & Child Neurology, 43, 279–285.
  10. Miyahara, M., Tsuji, M., Hanai, T., Jongmans, M., Barnett, A. L., Henderson, S. E., et al. (1998). The movement assessment battery for children: A preliminary investigation of its usefulness in Japan. Human Movement Science, 17, 679–697.
  11. Chow, S. M. K., Henderson, S. E., & Barnett, A. L. (2001). The Movement Assessment Battery for Children: A comparison of 4-year-old to 6-year-old children from Hong Kong and the United States. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 55, 55–61.
  12. Wright, H. C., Sugden, D. A., Ng, R., & Tan, J. (1994). Identification of children with movement problems in Singapore: Usefulness of the movement ABC checklist. Adapted Physical Activity Quarterly, 11, 150–157.
  13. Rosblad, B. & Gard, L. (1998). The assessment of children with developmental coordination disorders in Sweden: A preliminary investigation of the suitability of the movement ABC. Human Movement Science, 17, 711–719.
  14. Dewey, D., & Wilson, B. N. (2001). Developmental coordination disorder: What is it? Physical & Occupational Therapy in Pediatrics, 20, 5–27.
  15. Harvey, W. J., & Reid, G. (2003). A review of fundamental movement skill performance and physical fitness of children with ADHD. Adapted Physical Activity Quarterly, 20, 1–25.
  16. Miyahara, M., Piek, J., & Barrett, N. (2006). Accuracy of drawing in a dual-task and resistance-to-distraction study: motor or attention deficit. Human Movement Science, 25, 100–109.
  17. Piek, J. M., Pitcher, T. M., & Hay, D. A. (1999). Motor coordination and kinaesthesis in boys with attention deficit-hyperactivity disorder. Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology, 41, 159–165.
  18. Green, D., Baird, G., Barnett, A. L., Henderson, L., Huber, J., & Henderson, S. E. (2002). The severity and nature of motor impairment in Asperger’s Syndrome: A comparison with specific developmental disorder of motor function. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 43(4), 655–688.
  19. Smith, I. M. (2004). Motor problems in children with Autistic Spectrum Disorders. In D. Dewey & D. E. Tupper (Eds. ), Developmental Motor Disorders: A neuropsychological perspective (pp. 152–169). New York: The Guildford Press.
  20. Hill, E. L. (2001). Non-specific nature of specific language impairment: A review of the literature with regard to concomitant motor impairments. International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders, 36, 149–171.