Incontinence Quality of Life Instrument: Difference between revisions

No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
<div class="editorbox">
<div class="editorbox">
'''Original Editor '''- Your name will be added here if you created the original content for this page.
'''Original Editor '''- [[User:Kirsten Ryan|Kirsten Ryan]]


'''Lead Editors''' - Your name will be added here if you are a lead editor on this page.&nbsp; [[Physiopedia:Editors|Read more.]]  
'''Lead Editors''' - Your name will be added here if you are a lead editor on this page.&nbsp; [[Physiopedia:Editors|Read more.]]  
</div>  
</div>  
== Objective<br> ==
== Objective<br> ==


The Incontinence Quality of Life Instrument (I-QOL) is a self report quality of life measure specific to urinary incontinence.<ref name="Patrick" />
The Incontinence Quality of Life Instrument (I-QOL) is a self report quality of life measure specific to urinary incontinence.<ref name="Patrick" />  


== Intended Population<br> ==
== Intended Population<br> ==


Women with urinary incontinence.<ref name="Patrick">Patrick DL, Martin ML, Bushnell DM, Yalcin I, Wagner TH, Bueshing DP. Quality of life of women with urinary incontinence. Urology 1999;53:71-6.</ref>
Women with urinary incontinence.<ref name="Patrick">Patrick DL, Martin ML, Bushnell DM, Yalcin I, Wagner TH, Bueshing DP. Quality of life of women with urinary incontinence. Urology 1999;53:71-6.</ref>  


== Method of Use  ==
== Method of Use  ==


The I-QOL has 22 questions with the following 3 subscales:&nbsp; avoid and limiting behaviors (items), psychosocial impacts (9 items), and social embarassment (5 items).&nbsp; It is easily self-administered and takes about 5 minutes to complete.<ref name="Patrick" />&nbsp;
The I-QOL has 22 questions with the following 3 subscales:&nbsp; avoid and limiting behaviors (items), psychosocial impacts (9 items), and social embarassment (5 items).&nbsp; It is easily self-administered and takes about 5 minutes to complete.<ref name="Patrick" />&nbsp;  


== Reference<br>  ==
== Reference<br>  ==
Line 22: Line 22:
=== Reliability  ===
=== Reliability  ===


The I-QOL had high internal consistency (alpha = 0.95) for the overall summary score.&nbsp; The subscales were also internally consistent at alpha 0.87 for behaviors, 0.93 for psychosocial impacts, and 0.91 for social embarassment.&nbsp; The intraclass coefficient assessment of reproducibility at 2 weeks was 0.91 for the total score and 0.87, 0.91, and 0.88 for the behaviors, psychosocial impacts, and social embarassment subscales, respectively.<ref name="Patrick" />
The I-QOL had high internal consistency (alpha = 0.95) for the overall summary score.&nbsp; The subscales were also internally consistent at alpha 0.87 for behaviors, 0.93 for psychosocial impacts, and 0.91 for social embarassment.&nbsp; The intraclass coefficient assessment of reproducibility at 2 weeks was 0.91 for the total score and 0.87, 0.91, and 0.88 for the behaviors, psychosocial impacts, and social embarassment subscales, respectively.<ref name="Patrick" />  


=== Validity  ===
=== Validity  ===


Construct validity was examined by comparing the I-QOL and its subscales to related measures.&nbsp; All correlations were signficant at the 0.01 level except "bodily pain."&nbsp; I-QOL scores were found to be more closely related to well-being (0.42) than to either mental health (0.35) or bodily pain (0.15).<ref name="Patrick" />
Construct validity was examined by comparing the I-QOL and its subscales to related measures.&nbsp; All correlations were signficant at the 0.01 level except "bodily pain."&nbsp; I-QOL scores were found to be more closely related to well-being (0.42) than to either mental health (0.35) or bodily pain (0.15).<ref name="Patrick" />  


=== Responsiveness  ===
=== Responsiveness  ===


Statistics summarizing responsiveness varied from 0.4 to 0.8 and were associated with a 2% to 13% change in the I-QOL.&nbsp; Minimally important changes were defined as the percent change in I-QOL score for the improved group using the measures of pad weight and number of incontinent episodes and lowest category of improvement for patient global impression ratings.<ref name="Patrick" />
Statistics summarizing responsiveness varied from 0.4 to 0.8 and were associated with a 2% to 13% change in the I-QOL.&nbsp; Minimally important changes were defined as the percent change in I-QOL score for the improved group using the measures of pad weight and number of incontinent episodes and lowest category of improvement for patient global impression ratings.<ref name="Patrick" />  


=== Miscellaneous<span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-weight: normal; font-size: 20px"></span><br> ===
=== Miscellaneous<span style="font-weight: normal; font-size: 20px;" class="Apple-style-span"></span><br> ===


The I-QOL is available in 16 different languages.<ref name="Patrick" />
The I-QOL is available in 16 different languages.<ref name="Patrick" />  


== Links  ==
== Links  ==
Line 40: Line 40:
== Recent Related Research (from [http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/ Pubmed])  ==
== Recent Related Research (from [http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/ Pubmed])  ==
<div class="researchbox">
<div class="researchbox">
<rss>Feed goes here!!|charset=UTF-8|short|max=10</rss>  
<rss>http://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/erss.cgi?rss_guid=10__S9PoH30KAMhY2u4g2VOEpW8XsH3mLKDpKie3nWaot_-g2R|charset=UTF-8|short|max=10</rss>  
</div>  
</div>  
== References  ==
== References  ==

Revision as of 18:31, 15 March 2011

Original Editor - Kirsten Ryan

Lead Editors - Your name will be added here if you are a lead editor on this page.  Read more.

Objective
[edit | edit source]

The Incontinence Quality of Life Instrument (I-QOL) is a self report quality of life measure specific to urinary incontinence.[1]

Intended Population
[edit | edit source]

Women with urinary incontinence.[1]

Method of Use[edit | edit source]

The I-QOL has 22 questions with the following 3 subscales:  avoid and limiting behaviors (items), psychosocial impacts (9 items), and social embarassment (5 items).  It is easily self-administered and takes about 5 minutes to complete.[1] 

Reference
[edit | edit source]

Evidence[edit | edit source]

Reliability[edit | edit source]

The I-QOL had high internal consistency (alpha = 0.95) for the overall summary score.  The subscales were also internally consistent at alpha 0.87 for behaviors, 0.93 for psychosocial impacts, and 0.91 for social embarassment.  The intraclass coefficient assessment of reproducibility at 2 weeks was 0.91 for the total score and 0.87, 0.91, and 0.88 for the behaviors, psychosocial impacts, and social embarassment subscales, respectively.[1]

Validity[edit | edit source]

Construct validity was examined by comparing the I-QOL and its subscales to related measures.  All correlations were signficant at the 0.01 level except "bodily pain."  I-QOL scores were found to be more closely related to well-being (0.42) than to either mental health (0.35) or bodily pain (0.15).[1]

Responsiveness[edit | edit source]

Statistics summarizing responsiveness varied from 0.4 to 0.8 and were associated with a 2% to 13% change in the I-QOL.  Minimally important changes were defined as the percent change in I-QOL score for the improved group using the measures of pad weight and number of incontinent episodes and lowest category of improvement for patient global impression ratings.[1]

Miscellaneous
[edit | edit source]

The I-QOL is available in 16 different languages.[1]

Links[edit | edit source]

Recent Related Research (from Pubmed)[edit | edit source]

Failed to load RSS feed from http://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/erss.cgi?rss_guid=10__S9PoH30KAMhY2u4g2VOEpW8XsH3mLKDpKie3nWaot_-g2R|charset=UTF-8|short|max=10: Error parsing XML for RSS

References[edit | edit source]

References will automatically be added here, see adding references tutorial.

  1. 1.0 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4 1.5 1.6 Patrick DL, Martin ML, Bushnell DM, Yalcin I, Wagner TH, Bueshing DP. Quality of life of women with urinary incontinence. Urology 1999;53:71-6.