ICU Mobility Scale: Difference between revisions
mNo edit summary |
mNo edit summary |
||
Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
== Objective == | == Objective == | ||
* To record patient's highest level of mobility in Intensive Care Unit (ICU) | * To record patient's highest level of mobility in Intensive Care Unit (ICU)<ref name=":0">Hodgson C, Needham D, Haines K, Bailey M, Ward A, Harrold M, Young P, Zanni J, Buhr H, Higgins A, Presneill J. Feasibility and inter-rater reliability of the ICU Mobility Scale. Heart & Lung. 2014 Jan 1;43(1):19-24.</ref><ref name=":1">Tipping CJ, Holland AE, Harrold M, Crawford T, Halliburton N, Hodgson CL. The minimal important difference of the ICU mobility scale. Heart & Lung. 2018 Sep 1;47(5):497-501.Tipping CJ, Holland AE, Harrold M, Crawford T, Halliburton N, Hodgson CL. The minimal important difference of the ICU mobility scale. Heart & Lung. 2018 Sep 1;47(5):497-501.</ref> | ||
== Intended Population == | == Intended Population == | ||
* Patient's admitted in ICU <br> | * Patient's admitted in ICU <ref name=":1" /><br> | ||
== Method of Use == | == Method of Use == | ||
Health professionals working in ICU setting can easily use the outcome tool in the patient to check the highest mobility level of patient. | Health professionals working in ICU setting can easily use the outcome tool in the patient to check the highest mobility level of patient.<ref name=":0" /> | ||
== Evidence == | == Evidence == | ||
=== Reliability === | === Reliability === | ||
* Intraclass correlation: 0.80 (0.75-0.84) | * Intraclass correlation: 0.80 (0.75-0.84)<ref name=":0" /> | ||
* Interrater reliability with kappa score: 0.84 for senior and junior physiotherapists, 0.77 for senior physiotherapists and nurse and 0.90 for junior physiotherapist and nurse. | * Interrater reliability with kappa score: 0.84 for senior and junior physiotherapists, 0.77 for senior physiotherapists and nurse and 0.90 for junior physiotherapist and nurse<ref name=":0" />. | ||
=== Validity === | === Validity === | ||
=== Responsiveness === | === Responsiveness === | ||
=== Minimal Important Difference === | |||
* 0.89-3<ref name=":1" /> | |||
=== Miscellaneous<span style="font-size: 20px; font-weight: normal;" class="Apple-style-span"></span> === | === Miscellaneous<span style="font-size: 20px; font-weight: normal;" class="Apple-style-span"></span> === |
Revision as of 15:04, 12 September 2020
Original Editor - User Name
Top Contributors - Redisha Jakibanjar and Kim Jackson
Objective[edit | edit source]
Intended Population[edit | edit source]
- Patient's admitted in ICU [2]
Method of Use[edit | edit source]
Health professionals working in ICU setting can easily use the outcome tool in the patient to check the highest mobility level of patient.[1]
Evidence[edit | edit source]
Reliability[edit | edit source]
- Intraclass correlation: 0.80 (0.75-0.84)[1]
- Interrater reliability with kappa score: 0.84 for senior and junior physiotherapists, 0.77 for senior physiotherapists and nurse and 0.90 for junior physiotherapist and nurse[1].
Validity[edit | edit source]
Responsiveness[edit | edit source]
Minimal Important Difference[edit | edit source]
- 0.89-3[2]
Miscellaneous[edit | edit source]
Links[edit | edit source]
References[edit | edit source]
- ↑ 1.0 1.1 1.2 1.3 Hodgson C, Needham D, Haines K, Bailey M, Ward A, Harrold M, Young P, Zanni J, Buhr H, Higgins A, Presneill J. Feasibility and inter-rater reliability of the ICU Mobility Scale. Heart & Lung. 2014 Jan 1;43(1):19-24.
- ↑ 2.0 2.1 2.2 Tipping CJ, Holland AE, Harrold M, Crawford T, Halliburton N, Hodgson CL. The minimal important difference of the ICU mobility scale. Heart & Lung. 2018 Sep 1;47(5):497-501.Tipping CJ, Holland AE, Harrold M, Crawford T, Halliburton N, Hodgson CL. The minimal important difference of the ICU mobility scale. Heart & Lung. 2018 Sep 1;47(5):497-501.