Defining the Evidence Based Practice Decision-Making Model: Difference between revisions

No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 103: Line 103:


== Evidence Based Practice Applications ==
== Evidence Based Practice Applications ==
In healthcare settings there are different ways to apply the EBP model. Some examples of typical clinical questions include:
{| class="wikitable"
|+Table 3. Examples of Clinical Questions Used in Evidence Based Practice Application
!Question
!What does it help determine?
|-
|How common is the problem?
|Incidence or prevalence
|-
|Is the diagnostic test or monitoring test accurate
|Diagnosis
|-
|What will happen if we do not add a therapy?
|Prognosis
|-
|Does this intervention help?
|Benefits of treatment
|-
|What are the common harms? or What are the rare harms of a specific treatment?
|Harms of treatment
|-
|Can this test help with the early detection of a specific condition
|Screening application
|}


== Challenges of EBP ==
== Challenges of EBP ==

Revision as of 08:56, 30 October 2023

This article or area is currently under construction and may only be partially complete. Please come back soon to see the finished work! (30/10/2023)

Original Editor - Wanda van Niekerk

Top Contributors - Wanda van Niekerk, Jess Bell and Angeliki Chorti

Introduction[edit | edit source]

Evidence-based practice (EBP) was first introduced in the early 1990's as evidence-based medicine (EBM). [1] This “new paradigm” initially involved the practice of clinical medicine with the aim to develop and advance a transparent and rational process for clinical decision-making that did not exclusively rely on intuition and single clinical expertise and can be taught, refined, and applied by all clinicians. [2] Since then, various models and frameworks have been proposed in the healthcare setting that do not apply to the field of medicine only. [3]

Revised Model of Evidence Based Practice[edit | edit source]

Read more about the first models of evidence based practice from Sackett et al. and Haynes et al.: Introduction and Overview of Evidence Based Practice

Satterfield et al. in 2009 [2] further developed the evidence-based practice model and provided it with a transdisciplinary perspective by adding each discipline's efforts towards addressing deficiencies and making advances. The aim was to provide a common language across disciplines. This model had a new external frame that provided environmental and organisational context.[2] The three inner pillars of this model involved the[2]:

  • best available research evidence
  • client or population’s characteristics, state, needs, values and preferences
  • resources including practitioner’s expertise

At the centre of this evidence-based model was clinical decision-making.[2]

Read more: Toward a Transdisciplinary Model of Evidence-Based Practice.[2] Figure 5 provides a schematic of this model.

Evidence Based Practice Steps[edit | edit source]

Although these steps are chronologically numbered, they don't always occur in the same sequence. Often it is necessary to go back a few steps before moving forward again. Keep this in mind when applying the evidence based practice model in your specific setting.

  • Step 1: Determining the patient’s needs to formulate a clinical question
  • Step 2: Locating the knowledge resources
  • Step 3: Appraising the quality of the knowledge resources
  • Step 4: Discussing the options with the patient
  • Step 5: Formulate the treatment plan
  • Step 6: Implementing the treatment plan
  • Step 7: Evaluate the effectiveness of the treatment plan and the evidence-based practice process

5 A’s of Evidence Base Practice[edit | edit source]

The evidence based practice steps are also often referred to as the 5 A's. Note that some text uses different terminologies (terms in bracket)[4][5]:

  • Ask
  • Acquire (Access)
  • Appraise
  • Apply
  • Assess (Audit)
Table 1. The steps of Evidence Based Practice
Steps of Evidence Based Practice Description of steps Which A?
Determining the patient’s needs to formulate a clinical question
  • thorough assessment - patient interview, history, physical assessment considering patient's needs, values, context, preferences and beliefs
  • this information is used to formulate the clinical question to be answered through the clinical decision-making process
Ask
Locating the knowledge resources creating a search strategy, which databases and which type of resources to use Acquire
Appraising the quality of the knowledge resources
  • clinical checklists
  • methodological quality assessments
Appraise
Discussing the options with the patient
  • interactive discussion with patient
  • these three steps link closely together and you may need to sometimes move up and down between these steps
Apply
Formulating the treatment plan
Implementing the treatment plan
Evaluate the effectiveness of the treatment plan and the evidence-based practice process
  • revise
  • review
  • reflect
Assess

Common Terminologies[edit | edit source]

Table 2. Common Terminology Related to Evidence Based Practice
Term Definition
Empirically supported treatments "treatments or interventions that have a specific type of research support for their effectiveness or efficacy" on one specific disorder/condition/population[6]
Best practice "strategies, approaches or activities that have been shown (through research and evaluation) to be effective, efficient, sustainable and/or transferable, and to reliably lead to a desired result"[7]
Research informed practice decision-making through the "conscientious, explicit and judicious use of the best available evidence from multiple sources to increase the likelihood of a favourable outcome."[8] It does not include patient preferences, values, context and clinical expertise.

Evidence Based Practice Applications[edit | edit source]

In healthcare settings there are different ways to apply the EBP model. Some examples of typical clinical questions include:

Table 3. Examples of Clinical Questions Used in Evidence Based Practice Application
Question What does it help determine?
How common is the problem? Incidence or prevalence
Is the diagnostic test or monitoring test accurate Diagnosis
What will happen if we do not add a therapy? Prognosis
Does this intervention help? Benefits of treatment
What are the common harms? or What are the rare harms of a specific treatment? Harms of treatment
Can this test help with the early detection of a specific condition Screening application

Challenges of EBP[edit | edit source]

Lack of time to search for and apply the best available evidence – mostly due to heavy patient case loads. [9]

Not enough or not good enough research available on all conditions and scenarios. [10]

Finding the right resources between the masses is difficult H, Tabrizi JS, Azami‐Aghdash S. Barriers to evidence‐based medicine: a systematic review. Journal of evaluation in clinical practice. 2014 Dec;20(6):793-802.


Accessing the resources Ibikunle PO, Onwuakagba IU, Maduka EU, Okoye EC, Umunna JO. Perceived barriers to evidence‐based practice in stroke management among physiotherapists in a developing country. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice. 2021 Apr;27(2):291-306.

Lack of administrative support Naghibi et al

Not skilled in critical appraisal Naghibi

Not enough role models who practice evidence-based practice regularly

Advantages

It offers the surest and most objective way to determine and maintain consistently

high quality and safety standards in medical practice.

It can help speed up the process of transferring clinical research findings into

practice.

It has the potential to reduce healthcare costs significantly.”

Reduce variability of care

Increases healthcare provider empowerment and role satisfaction

Meets expectations of an informed public 

Resources[edit | edit source]

  • bulleted list
  • x

or

  1. numbered list
  2. x

References[edit | edit source]

  1. Evidence-Based Medicine Working Group. Evidence-based medicine. A new approach to teaching the practice of medicine. JAMA. 1992 Nov 4;268(17):2420-5.
  2. 2.0 2.1 2.2 2.3 2.4 2.5 Satterfield J, Spring B, Brownson R, Mullen E, Newhouse R, Walker B, Whitlock E. Toward a Transdisciplinary Model of Evidence-Based Practice. Milbank Q. 2009 Jun; 87(2): 368–390.
  3. Dusin J, Melanson A, Mische-Lawson L. Evidence-based practice models and frameworks in the healthcare setting: a scoping review. BMJ Open. 2023; 13(5): e071188.
  4. Brettle A. Implementing evidence-based practice: a guide for radiographers. Radiography. 2020 Oct 1;26:S37-41.
  5. Hoffmann T, Bennett S, Del Mar C. Evidence-based practice across the health professions. Elsevier Health Sciences; 2023 Sep 27.
  6. Drisko JW, Friedman A. Let’s clearly distinguish evidence-based practice and empirically supported treatments. Smith College Studies in Social Work. 2019 Oct 2;89(3-4):264-81.
  7. Fauci AJ, D’Angelo D, Coclite D, Napoletano A, Gianola S, Ferrara C, Di Nitto M, Gensini G. Exploring the definition and methodology of “best practice” in the health care literature: a scoping review protocol. JBI Evidence Synthesis. 2023 Oct 1;21(10):2134-41.
  8. Barends E, Rousseau DM, Briner RB. Evidence-Based Management, The Basic Principles. In Search of Evidence. 2011 Sep 3.
  9. Naghibi D, Mohammadzadeh S, Azami-Aghdash S. Barriers to evidence-based practice in health system: a systematic review. Evidence Based Care. 2021 Jul 1;11(2):74-82.
  10. Sadeghi-Bazargani H, Tabrizi JS, Azami-Aghdash S. Barriers to evidence-based medicine: a systematic review. J Eval Clin Pract. 2014 Dec;20(6):793-802.