Cervical Spine Fractures in Contact Sports

Definition/Description[edit | edit source]

Text

Clinically Relevant Anatomy[edit | edit source]

Text

Pathology[edit | edit source]

Text

Epidemiology[edit | edit source]

Text

Aetiology/Mechanism of Injury[edit | edit source]

Text

Pitch-side Management[edit | edit source]

Management of cervical spine injuries in sport starts from the moment the player goes down on the pitch. Until a cervical spine injury can be definitively ruled out, players need to be handled with the utmost care to prevent exacerbating the injury and causing permanent harm.

Assessing on the Pitch

As pitch-side practitioners do not have the tools nor time to accurately determine whether a player has a C-Spine injury, the most telling sign is usually the mechanism of injury. Prompt identification of any potentially catastrophic injuries is vital. Crosby et al., estimates that 2-5% of blunt trauma patients have a cervical spine injury.

If the practitioner witnessed trauma to the head or neck, or if their view was restricted and they could not see, then they must immediately perform manual inline stabilisation (MILS) to take control of the head. MILS is a manoeuvre used when a patient has suspected C-Spine trauma to provide a degree of stability to the cervical spine, prior to the application of a cervical collar (Queensland Ambulance Services, 2016). This will help minimise excessive movement and thereby reduce the chance of further injury. To perform MILS the practitioner or assistant should:

  • Crouch/kneel/lie beside or behind the player
    • The clinician should attempt to stabilise their elbows/arms on the ground, against another stable object or on their knees to prevent swaying as they become fatigued
  • Place both hands on the patient’s mastoid processes or cradle the occiput
  • Apply equal pressure so not to move the head or let it fall


Primary Survey

To assess a patient on the field, the clinician must first perform a primary survey. The first part involves assessing the players alertness, and then includes checking the players airways, breathing and circulation to identify any life-threating injuries. This survey will identify immediately if the player is breathing normally. It will ensure that the medical practitioner is fully aware if they have to carry out immediate interventions that could save the players life. If no immediately life-threatening injuries are present, then the clinician should determine a level of consciousness and conduct a neurological screening.

Secondary Survey

The secondary survey is a detailed head-to-toe examination with the purpose of determining whether the player has suffered any other injuries. This on-field evaluation should include an examination of level of consciousness, cognitive and memory processes, and cranial nerve function, with awareness that significant brain injury is possible. This is determined with the help of an A-E assessment. Maddocks questions are also used to investigate the suspicion of a head injury. They’re 5 questions that are utilised to evaluate orientation as well as assessing short- and long-term memory function. The following is taken from the Sports Concussion Assessment Tool (SCAT). The SCAT is a standardised concussion screening tool used by medical practitioners as an effective pitch-side assessment mechanism:

The neurological evaluation of a conscious player can be used to further investigate potential C-Spine trauma and begins with questions about extremity numbness, painful dysesthesias or paraesthesia, weakness, and neck pain. A physical examination is limited to asking if the patient can move all of their limbs. If there is any gross weakness, numbness, or significant pain to the cervical region, then this could be indicative of a serious neurological deficit. If the athlete is unconscious or presents with any of the above symptoms, then they will need to be extracted off the pitch.

Indications for Surgery[edit | edit source]

Text

Management and Treatment[edit | edit source]

Text