Cervical Distraction Test: Difference between revisions

No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 20: Line 20:
== Evidence  ==
== Evidence  ==


Provide the evidence for this technique here
   '''Cervical Distraction Test'''
 
Sensitivity   .44
 
Specificity&nbsp;&nbsp; .97<ref name="Rubinstein et al">Rubinstein SM, Pool JJM, van Tulder MW, Riphagen II, de Vet HCW. A systemic review of the diagnostic accuracy of provocative tests of the neck for diagnosing cervical radiculopathy. Eur Spine J.2007;16:307-319.</ref>
 
Reliability&nbsp; .88<ref name="Wainner et al">Wainner RS, Fritz JM, Irrgang JJ, Boninger ML, Delitto A, Allison S. Reliability and diagnostic accuracy of the clinical examination and patient self-report measures for cervical radiculopathy. Spine. 2003;28(1):52-62.</ref>


== Resources  ==
== Resources  ==

Revision as of 05:49, 8 December 2009

Original Editor - Your name will be added here if you created the original content for this page.

Lead Editors - Your name will be added here if you are a lead editor on this page.  Read more.

Purpose
[edit | edit source]

To test for the presence of cervical radiculopathy.[1] [2]

Technique
[edit | edit source]

Patient lies supine and the neck is comfortably positioned. Examiner securely grasps the patient's head under the occiput and chin and gradually applies an axial traction. 

A positive test is the reduction or eliminatin of symptoms.[3]


                                                                  Image:Cervical_distraction.jpg

Evidence[edit | edit source]

   Cervical Distraction Test

Sensitivity   .44

Specificity   .97[4]

Reliability  .88[5]

Resources[edit | edit source]

add any relevant resources here

Recent Related Research (from Pubmed)[edit | edit source]

Extension:RSS -- Error: Not a valid URL: Feed goes here!!|charset=UTF-8|short|max=10

References[edit | edit source]

References will automatically be added here, see adding references tutorial.

  1. Flynn TW, Cleland JA, Whitman JM. Users' guide to the musculoskeletal examination. United States; Evidence in Motion:2008.
  2. Malange GA,Landes P, Nadler SF. Provocation tests in the cervical spine examination: historical basis and scientific analyses. Pain Physician. 2003;6:199-205
  3. Wainner RS, Gill H. Diagnosis and nonoperative management of cervical radiculopathy. J Ortho Sports PT.2000 Dec;30(12):728-744.
  4. Rubinstein SM, Pool JJM, van Tulder MW, Riphagen II, de Vet HCW. A systemic review of the diagnostic accuracy of provocative tests of the neck for diagnosing cervical radiculopathy. Eur Spine J.2007;16:307-319.
  5. Wainner RS, Fritz JM, Irrgang JJ, Boninger ML, Delitto A, Allison S. Reliability and diagnostic accuracy of the clinical examination and patient self-report measures for cervical radiculopathy. Spine. 2003;28(1):52-62.