Cervical Distraction Test: Difference between revisions

No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 4: Line 4:
'''Lead Editors''' - Your name will be added here if you are a lead editor on this page.  [[Physiopedia:Editors|Read more.]]  
'''Lead Editors''' - Your name will be added here if you are a lead editor on this page.  [[Physiopedia:Editors|Read more.]]  
</div>  
</div>  
== Purpose<br> ==
== Purpose<br> ==


add the purpose of this assessment technique here<br>  
To test for the presence of cervical radiculopathy.<ref name="Users' guide">Flynn TW, Cleland JA, Whitman JM. Users' guide to the musculoskeletal examination. United States; Evidence in Motion:2008.</ref>&nbsp;<ref name="Malange et al">Malange GA,Landes P, Nadler SF. Provocation tests in the cervical spine examination: historical basis and scientific analyses. Pain Physician. 2003;6:199-205</ref><br>


== Technique<br>  ==
== Technique<br>  ==

Revision as of 05:07, 8 December 2009

Original Editor - Your name will be added here if you created the original content for this page.

Lead Editors - Your name will be added here if you are a lead editor on this page.  Read more.

Purpose
[edit | edit source]

To test for the presence of cervical radiculopathy.[1] [2]

Technique
[edit | edit source]

Describe how to carry out this assessment technique here

Evidence[edit | edit source]

Provide the evidence for this technique here

Resources[edit | edit source]

add any relevant resources here

Recent Related Research (from Pubmed)[edit | edit source]

Extension:RSS -- Error: Not a valid URL: Feed goes here!!|charset=UTF-8|short|max=10

References[edit | edit source]

References will automatically be added here, see adding references tutorial.

  1. Flynn TW, Cleland JA, Whitman JM. Users' guide to the musculoskeletal examination. United States; Evidence in Motion:2008.
  2. Malange GA,Landes P, Nadler SF. Provocation tests in the cervical spine examination: historical basis and scientific analyses. Pain Physician. 2003;6:199-205