Balance-Based Torso-Weighting: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
<div class="editorbox"> '''Original Editor '''- [[User:Jonathan Wong|Jonathan Wong]] '''Top Contributors''' - {{Special:Contributors/{{FULLPAGENAME}}}}</div> | <div class="editorbox"> '''Original Editor '''- [[User:Jonathan Wong|Jonathan Wong]] '''Top Contributors''' - {{Special:Contributors/{{FULLPAGENAME}}}}</div> | ||
Balance-based torso-weighting | === Introduction === | ||
Balance-based torso-weighting (BBTW) is a treatment method for people with [[ataxia]]. | |||
=== Description === | |||
In people with [[ataxia]], uncoordinated movement can result in postural instability and falls<ref>Rüb U, Brunt ER, Seidel K, Gierga K, Mooy CM, Kettner M, Van Broeckhoven C, Bechmann I, La Spada AR, Schöls L, Den Dunnen W. S[https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/j.1365-2990.2007.00882.x pinocerebellar ataxia type 7 (SCA7): Widespread brain damage in an adult‐onset patient with progressive visual impairments in comparison with an adult‐onset patient without visual impairments.] Neuropathology and applied neurobiology. 2008 Apr;34(2):155-68.</ref><ref>Widener GL, Conley N, Whiteford S, Gee J, Harrell A, Gibson‐Horn C, et al. [[Changes in standing stability with balance‐based torso‐weighting with cerebellar ataxia: A pilot study.]] Physiotherapy research international : the journal for researchers and clinicians in physical therapy. 2020;25(1):e1814–n/a. </ref>. Postural instability may manifest as increased variability of direction and amplitude of movement, particularly at the trunk, which increases fall risk for people with ataxia<ref>Conte C, Pierelli F, Casali C, Ranavolo A, Draicchio F, Martino G, Harfoush M, Padua L, Coppola G, Sandrini G, Serrao M. [[Upper body kinematics in patients with cerebellar ataxia]]. The Cerebellum. 2014 Dec;13:689-97.</ref>. | |||
=== Method === | |||
BBTW involves assessment of a standing individual's directional instability while a trained clinician manually applies perturbations and resisted rotations at the shoulders and pelvis. The clinician strategically places light weights (objects with designated mass) on the trunk to counter instability. The mechanism for the effectiveness of BBTW is not specifically known. Prior work has disproven a strictly biomechanical mechanism (Crittendon et al., [[/onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/pri.1814#pri1814-bib-0009|2014]]) and argued against alternative hypotheses such as joint compression or increased conscious awareness proposed when heavier weights are used (Hunt, Widener, & Allen, [[/onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/pri.1814#pri1814-bib-0017|2014]]). The mechanism likely involves enhanced sensory input to improve perception of self-motion and position (Crittendon et al., [[/onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/pri.1814#pri1814-bib-0009|2014]]). The theoretical rationale for proposing BBTW for people with CA is that a stronger sensory signal may help compensate for sensory integration deficits resulting in ataxia and postural control issues in this population. | |||
The therapist started balance assessment by observing the relative amount and direction of sway while the participant stood quietly (Gibson-Horn, [[/onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/pri.1814#pri1814-bib-0014|2008]]). The therapist then applied anterior, posterior, and lateral perturbations (nudges) at the shoulders and pelvis to observe the participant's response and direction of balance loss. Rotational forces were applied manually through the shoulders and pelvis to determine asymmetries in the participant's ability to maximally resist while maintaining upright balance. | |||
Loss of balance during perturbations and rotational forces was scored on a 0–4 scale developed to facilitate application of weights in the BBTW procedure (Allen et al., [[/onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/pri.1814#pri1814-bib-0001|2018]]). Responses were scored: (0) No balance loss, brisk response to perturbation; (1) Minimal balance loss, delayed onset of return to upright, (2) Moderate balance loss, large trunk movement or parachute reaction with no foot movement; (3) Moderate–severe balance loss, large trunk movement with foot movement or takes a small step; (4) Severe balance loss, manual contact by the researcher required to prevent a fall. The scale has shown good to excellent inter-rater agreement (Allen et al., [[/onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/pri.1814#pri1814-bib-0001|2018]]) indicating that other therapists can observe balance loss similarly. | |||
=== Evidence === | |||
Balance-based torso-weighting has mainly been used in the patients with multiple sclerosis population<ref name=":0">Crittendon A, O'Neill D, Widener GL, Allen DD. [[Standing data disproves biomechanical mechanism for balance-based torso-weighting]]. Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation. 2014 Jan 1;95(1):43-9.</ref><ref>Gorgas AM, Widener GL, Gibson‐Horn C, Allen DD. [[Gait changes with balance‐based torso‐weighting in people with multiple sclerosis]]. Physiotherapy Research International. 2015 Mar;20(1):45-53.</ref>, however, there is a shifting trend in that this treatment method has been adapted for patients with cerebellar ataxia as well. | |||
BBTW has shown improvements for people with multiple sclerosis in gait velocity and cadence, and static standing<ref name=":0" />. | |||
Revision as of 00:51, 22 April 2024
Introduction[edit | edit source]
Balance-based torso-weighting (BBTW) is a treatment method for people with ataxia.
Description[edit | edit source]
In people with ataxia, uncoordinated movement can result in postural instability and falls[1][2]. Postural instability may manifest as increased variability of direction and amplitude of movement, particularly at the trunk, which increases fall risk for people with ataxia[3].
Method[edit | edit source]
BBTW involves assessment of a standing individual's directional instability while a trained clinician manually applies perturbations and resisted rotations at the shoulders and pelvis. The clinician strategically places light weights (objects with designated mass) on the trunk to counter instability. The mechanism for the effectiveness of BBTW is not specifically known. Prior work has disproven a strictly biomechanical mechanism (Crittendon et al., 2014) and argued against alternative hypotheses such as joint compression or increased conscious awareness proposed when heavier weights are used (Hunt, Widener, & Allen, 2014). The mechanism likely involves enhanced sensory input to improve perception of self-motion and position (Crittendon et al., 2014). The theoretical rationale for proposing BBTW for people with CA is that a stronger sensory signal may help compensate for sensory integration deficits resulting in ataxia and postural control issues in this population.
The therapist started balance assessment by observing the relative amount and direction of sway while the participant stood quietly (Gibson-Horn, 2008). The therapist then applied anterior, posterior, and lateral perturbations (nudges) at the shoulders and pelvis to observe the participant's response and direction of balance loss. Rotational forces were applied manually through the shoulders and pelvis to determine asymmetries in the participant's ability to maximally resist while maintaining upright balance.
Loss of balance during perturbations and rotational forces was scored on a 0–4 scale developed to facilitate application of weights in the BBTW procedure (Allen et al., 2018). Responses were scored: (0) No balance loss, brisk response to perturbation; (1) Minimal balance loss, delayed onset of return to upright, (2) Moderate balance loss, large trunk movement or parachute reaction with no foot movement; (3) Moderate–severe balance loss, large trunk movement with foot movement or takes a small step; (4) Severe balance loss, manual contact by the researcher required to prevent a fall. The scale has shown good to excellent inter-rater agreement (Allen et al., 2018) indicating that other therapists can observe balance loss similarly.
Evidence[edit | edit source]
Balance-based torso-weighting has mainly been used in the patients with multiple sclerosis population[4][5], however, there is a shifting trend in that this treatment method has been adapted for patients with cerebellar ataxia as well.
BBTW has shown improvements for people with multiple sclerosis in gait velocity and cadence, and static standing[4].
- ↑ Rüb U, Brunt ER, Seidel K, Gierga K, Mooy CM, Kettner M, Van Broeckhoven C, Bechmann I, La Spada AR, Schöls L, Den Dunnen W. Spinocerebellar ataxia type 7 (SCA7): Widespread brain damage in an adult‐onset patient with progressive visual impairments in comparison with an adult‐onset patient without visual impairments. Neuropathology and applied neurobiology. 2008 Apr;34(2):155-68.
- ↑ Widener GL, Conley N, Whiteford S, Gee J, Harrell A, Gibson‐Horn C, et al. Changes in standing stability with balance‐based torso‐weighting with cerebellar ataxia: A pilot study. Physiotherapy research international : the journal for researchers and clinicians in physical therapy. 2020;25(1):e1814–n/a.
- ↑ Conte C, Pierelli F, Casali C, Ranavolo A, Draicchio F, Martino G, Harfoush M, Padua L, Coppola G, Sandrini G, Serrao M. Upper body kinematics in patients with cerebellar ataxia. The Cerebellum. 2014 Dec;13:689-97.
- ↑ 4.0 4.1 Crittendon A, O'Neill D, Widener GL, Allen DD. Standing data disproves biomechanical mechanism for balance-based torso-weighting. Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation. 2014 Jan 1;95(1):43-9.
- ↑ Gorgas AM, Widener GL, Gibson‐Horn C, Allen DD. Gait changes with balance‐based torso‐weighting in people with multiple sclerosis. Physiotherapy Research International. 2015 Mar;20(1):45-53.
