Low Functioning Cerebral Palsy Physiotherapy Assessment and Intervention

Original Editor - Jess Bell based on the course by Dana Mather
Top Contributors - Jess Bell and Kim Jackson
This article or area is currently under construction and may only be partially complete. Please come back soon to see the finished work! (8/11/2023)

Introduction[edit | edit source]

Cerebral palsy (CP) is a heterogeneous non-progressive neuromotor disorder in an immature brain that affects movement and posture.[1] Primary impairments associated with cerebral palsy include spasticity, weakness, decreased motor control and movement dysfunction.[2] Cerebral palsy can also lead to a number of secondary musculoskeletal conditions, which can also affect functional ability.[2]

Children with cerebral palsy all present differently. Their mobility varies from walking without aids to using a wheelchair at all times.[3] There are various diagnostic sub-types, based on motor type and the distribution of cerebral palsy.

Types of cerebral palsy:[3] [4]

  • Spastic cerebral palsy
    • most common type and most amenable to treatment[5]
    • there are five types of spastic cerebral palsy:[3]
      • diplegia - either both arms or both legs are affected (most commonly both legs are affected)
      • hemiplegia or hemiparesis - affects the limbs on only one side of the body
      • quadriplegia or quadriparesis - all four limbs are affected
      • monoplegia - only one limb is affected (extremely rare)
      • triplegia - three limbs are affected
  • Dyskinetic cerebral palsy[6][7]
    • involves injury to the basal ganglia
    • children have impaired movement control, muscle tone and coordination
  • Ataxic cerebral palsy[8][9]
    • least common form of cerebral palsy
    • children present with incoordination of goal-directed movements

The distribution of cerebral palsy can be unilateral or bilateral.

For more information on the types of cerebral palsy, please see: Cerebral Palsy Aetiology and Pathology.

Gross Motor Function Classification System (GMFCS)[edit | edit source]

The Gross Motor Function Classification System (GMFCS) is a valid and reliable system that classifies children with cerebral palsy aged 2-18 years based on their gross motor function.[10]

It is a 5-point ordinal scale[11] that describes a child’s self-initiated movements and use of assistive devices for mobility.[3]

The levels are as follows:[3][12]

  • Level I: able to walk without limitations
  • Level II: can walk with limitations (e.g. balance, endurance limitations)
  • Level III: can walk using a hand-held mobility device (may use additional support, such as wheeled mobility, for longer distances, outdoors)
  • Level IV: self-mobility is limited - may be transported in a manual wheelchair or may use powered mobility
  • Level V: transported in a manual wheelchair

Reid et al.[13] note that a child classified as Level I will be able to perform the same activities as their peers, but their speed, balance or coordination may be impacted. However, a child classified as Level V will have difficulty achieving voluntary control of movement, and their head/trunk control is affected in many positions.

This page focuses on some of the key physiotherapy assessments for children with a GMFCS of Level 5 and offers some ideas for interventions. For information on the physiotherapy assessment and management of high-functioning cerebral palsy, please see: High Functioning Cerebral Palsy Physiotherapy Assessment and Intervention.

Assessment[edit | edit source]

The physical examination of a child with cerebral palsy needs to be systematic.[1] During the clinical assessment, we want to gain an understanding of each child’s medical, surgical, medication and developmental history, the child’s / caregivers’ chief concerns, as well as the child’s cognitive and behavioural status, functional mobility, family and environmental conditions and any assistive devices.[14]

Common outcome measures that are used to assess children with cerebral palsy are discussed here and key parts of the physiotherapy assessment are discussed below.

Range of Motion[edit | edit source]

It is essential to assess range of motion in the unaffected and affected joints, comparing sides. More information on performing the range of motion assessment is available here.

Muscle Strength[edit | edit source]

Children with cerebral palsy often present with weakness, so it is essential to assess their strength. To find out about assessing strength, please see: Assessing Muscle Strength.

Muscle Length[edit | edit source]

Muscle length refers to the ability of a muscle crossing a joint or joints to lengthen, thus allowing the joint or joints to move through their full available range of motion.[15][16] A muscle's ability to lengthen is essential for functional activities,[17] and it can be affected by changes in muscle tone. For more information on muscle length, please see: Assessing Muscle Length.

Muscle Tone[edit | edit source]

Key definitions related to muscle tone:

  • Spasticity: "a clinical phenomenon in which muscles overreact to passive stretch due to lack of supraspinal inhibition, and [it] is detected clinically as a velocity-dependent increase in tone."[1]
  • Hypotonia: "abnormal lack of muscle tone".[1]
  • Spasticity and hypotonia must be considered together, as both contribute to imbalance around joints and muscle imbalance.[1]

“Muscle tone is a complex and dynamic state, resulting from hierarchical and reciprocal anatomical connectivity.” Traditional definitions include: “the tension in the relaxed muscle” or “the resistance, felt by the examiner during passive stretching of a joint when the muscles are at rest”[18]

These definitions have some ambiguities, but as Ganguly et al. note, tone is essentially “a construct of motor control, upon which power is intrinsically balanced.”[18]

Children with cerebral palsy often present with altered muscle tone, so it forms a key component of the assessment. The Modified Ashworth Scale is the “most universally accepted clilnical tool” used to assess increases in muscle tone.[19]

To measure muscle tone using the Modified Ashworth Scale:[20]

  • Patient lies prone
  • A muscle that is primarily involved in flexing a joint is placed in maximal flexion and passively moved to maximal extension over a one-second count
  • A muscle that is primarily involved in extending a joint is placed in maximal flexion and passively moved to maximal flexion over a one-second count

The Modified Ashworth Scale is scored as follows:

Modified Ashworth Score[19]
o "No increase in muscle tone"
1 "Slight increase in muscle tone, with a catch and release or minimal resistance at the end of the range of motion when an affected part(s) is moved in flexion or extension"
1+ "Slight increase in muscle tone, manifested as a catch, followed by minimal resistance through the remainder (less than half) of the range of motion"
2 "A marked increase in muscle tone throughout most of the range of motion, but affected part(s) are still easily moved"
3 "Considerable increase in muscle tone, passive movement difficult"
4 "Affected part(s) rigid in flexion or extension"

Other scales used to assess tone include the Tardieu Scale and the Modified Tardieu Scale.

Hip Surveillance[edit | edit source]

Hip dislocation, subluxation and other related problems are common in children with cerebral palsy.[14] Nokak et al.[21] note that one in three children in high-resource settings have progressive hip displacement associated with their cerebral palsy. Therefore, if a child reports hip pain during their assessment, it’s important to check their hips and refer for hip surveillance.

“There is moderate-quality evidence and a strong recommendation to use comprehensive hip surveillance practices to facilitate early detection and management of hip displacement”.[21]

Specific hip tests include:

  • Barlow Test
    • aims to detect a dislocated hip by adducting the hip with a gentle posterior force[22]
  • Ortolani Test
    • aims to relocate a dislocated hip by abducting the hip with a gentle posterior force[22]
    • a palpable click considered is a positive Ortolani sign[14]
  • Galeazzi Sign[14]
    • The child is positioned in hooklying with their hips and knees bent and their feet flat on the surface
    • The therapist compares knee height
    • The Galeazzi sign is positive if one knee is higher than the other
    • This indicates that there is instability, a dislocation, or an anterior translation of that hip socket on the lower side
    • Valid across all ages

References[edit | edit source]

  1. 1.0 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4 Peterson N, Walton R. Ambulant cerebral palsy. Orthopaedics and Trauma. 2016;30(6):525-38.
  2. 2.0 2.1 Sarathy K, Doshi C, Aroojis A. Clinical examination of children with cerebral palsy. Indian J Orthop. 2019 Jan-Feb;53(1):35-44.
  3. 3.0 3.1 3.2 3.3 3.4 Mather D. Low Functioning Cerebral Palsy Physiotherapy Assessment and Intervention Course. Plus, 2023. Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name ":1" defined multiple times with different content
  4. Paul S, Nahar A, Bhagawati M, Kunwar AJ. A review on recent advances of cerebral palsy. Oxidative Medicine and Cellular Longevity. 2022 Jul 30;2022.
  5. Papavasiliou A, Ben-Pazi H, Mastroyianni S, Ortibus E. Cerebral palsy: new developments. Frontiers in Neurology. 2021;12.
  6. Eskay K. Cerebral Palsy Aetiology and Pathology Course. Plus, 2023.
  7. Li X, Arya K. Athetoid Cerebral Palsy. InStatPearls [Internet] 2021 Sep 28. StatPearls Publishing.
  8. Levy JP, Oskoui M, Ng P, Andersen J, Buckley D, Fehlings D, et al. Ataxic-hypotonic cerebral palsy in a cerebral palsy registry: Insights into a distinct subtype. Neurology: Clinical Practice. 2020 Apr 1;10(2):131-9.
  9. Eggink HE, Kremer DA, Brouwer OF, Contarino MF, van Egmond ME, Elema AG, et al. Spasticity, dyskinesia and ataxia in cerebral palsy: are we sure we can differentiate them?. European Journal of Paediatric Neurology. 2017 Sep 1;21(5):703-6.
  10. Patel DR, Neelakantan M, Pandher K, Merrick J. Cerebral palsy in children: a clinical overview. Transl Pediatr. 2020 Feb;9(Suppl 1):S125-S135.
  11. Ko J, Woo J, Her JG. The reliability and concurrent validity of the GMFCS for children with cerebral palsy. Journal of Physical Therapy Science. 2011;23: 255-8.
  12. CanChild. Gross Motor Function Classification System - Expanded & Revised. Available from: https://canchild.ca/en/resources/42-gross-motor-function-classification-system-expanded-revised-gmfcs-e-r (last accessed 27 September 2023).
  13. Reid SM, Carlin JB, Reddihough DS. Using the Gross Motor Function Classification System to describe patterns of motor severity in cerebral palsy. Developmental Medicine & Child Neurology, 2011 Nov 1;53(11):1007-12.
  14. 14.0 14.1 14.2 14.3 Eskay K. Cerebral Palsy General Assessment and Interventions Course. Plus, 2022.
  15. Norkin CC, White DJ. Measurement of Joint Motion: A Guide to Goniometry. FA Davis; 2016 Nov 18.
  16. Reese NB, Bandy WD. Joint Range of Motion and Muscle Length Testing-E-book. Elsevier Health Sciences; 2016 Mar 31.
  17. Tomalka A. Eccentric muscle contractions: from single muscle fibre to whole muscle mechanics. Pflugers Arch. 2023 Apr;475(4):421-435.
  18. 18.0 18.1 Ganguly J, Kulshreshtha D, Almotiri M, Jog M. Muscle Tone Physiology and Abnormalities. Toxins (Basel). 2021 Apr 16;13(4):282.
  19. 19.0 19.1 Harb A, Kishner S. Modified Ashworth Scale. [Updated 2023 May 1]. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2023 Jan-. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK554572/
  20. Shirley Ryan Abilitylab. Modified Ashworth Scale Instructions. Available from: https://www.sralab.org/sites/default/files/2017-06/Modified%20Ashworth%20Scale%20Instructions.pdf (last accessed 8 November 2023).
  21. 21.0 21.1 Novak I, Morgan C, Fahey M, Finch-Edmondson M, Galea C, Hines A, et al. State of the evidence traffic lights 2019: systematic review of interventions for preventing and treating children with cerebral palsy. Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep. 2020 Feb 21;20(2):3.
  22. 22.0 22.1 Shipman S, Helfand M, Nygren P, et al. Screening for Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip [Internet]. Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US); 2006 Mar. (Evidence Syntheses, No. 42.) 1, Introduction. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK33426/