Theories of Pain: Difference between revisions
Venus Pagare (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Venus Pagare (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
This theory consider that peripheral sensory receptors, responding to touch, warmth and other non-damaging as well as to damaging stimuli, give rise to non-painful or painful experiences as a result of differences in the patterns [in time] of the signals sent through the nervous system.<ref name="site1" /> | This theory consider that peripheral sensory receptors, responding to touch, warmth and other non-damaging as well as to damaging stimuli, give rise to non-painful or painful experiences as a result of differences in the patterns [in time] of the signals sent through the nervous system.<ref name="site1" /> | ||
Goldschneider (1920) proposed that there is no separate system for perceiving pain, and the receptors for pain are shared with other senses, such as of touch. According to this view, people feel pain when certain patterns of neural ctivity occur, such as when appropriate types of activity reach excessively high levels in the brain. These patterns occur only with intense stimulation. Because strong and mild stimuli of the same sense modality produce different patterns of neural activity, being hit hard feels painful, but being caressed does not.<ref name="site2" /> | |||
<br> | <br> | ||
Line 22: | Line 24: | ||
<br> | <br> | ||
<br> | <br> | ||
== References == | == References == |
Revision as of 20:47, 17 March 2014
Original Editor - Venus Pagare
Top Contributors - Venus Pagare, Kim Jackson, Andeela Hafeez, WikiSysop, Jasrah Javed and Admin
Introduction[edit | edit source]
1. Specificity Theory [edit | edit source]
This theory considers pain as an independent sensation with specialised peripheral sensory receptors [nociceptors], which respond to damage and send signals through pathways (along nerve fibres) in the nervous system to target centres in the brain. These brain centres process the signals to produce the experience of pain.[1]
Von Frey (1895) argued that the body has a separate sensory system for perceiving pain—just as it does for hearing and vision and this system contains its own special receptors for de:ecting pain stimuli, its own peripheral nerves and pathway to the brain, and its own area of the brain for processing pain signals. But this structure is not correct. [2]
2. Pattern Theory[edit | edit source]
This theory consider that peripheral sensory receptors, responding to touch, warmth and other non-damaging as well as to damaging stimuli, give rise to non-painful or painful experiences as a result of differences in the patterns [in time] of the signals sent through the nervous system.[3]
Goldschneider (1920) proposed that there is no separate system for perceiving pain, and the receptors for pain are shared with other senses, such as of touch. According to this view, people feel pain when certain patterns of neural ctivity occur, such as when appropriate types of activity reach excessively high levels in the brain. These patterns occur only with intense stimulation. Because strong and mild stimuli of the same sense modality produce different patterns of neural activity, being hit hard feels painful, but being caressed does not.[2]
References[edit | edit source]
- ↑ http://www.vet.ed.ac.uk/animalpain/Pages/theories.htm
- ↑ 2.0 2.1 http://admedadvice.blogspot.in/2006/09/types-and-theories-of-pain-types-of.html
- ↑ Cite error: Invalid
<ref>
tag; no text was provided for refs namedsite1