Anterior Drawer Test of the Knee: Difference between revisions

No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
<div class="editorbox">
<div class="editorbox">
'''Original Editor '''- Your name will be added here if you created the original content for this page.
'''Original Editor '''- Kathryn Schwartzkopf-Phifer<br>


'''Lead Editors''' - Your name will be added here if you are a lead editor on this page.&nbsp; [[Physiopedia:Editors|Read more.]]  
'''Lead Editors''' - Your name will be added here if you are a lead editor on this page.&nbsp; [[Physiopedia:Editors|Read more.]]  
Line 14: Line 14:
== Evidence<br>  ==
== Evidence<br>  ==


Sensitivity and specificity has been reported as .41-.91 and .86-1.0 respectively, with a -LR of .09-.62 and a +LR of 5.4-8.2.<ref name="Flynn, Cleland and Whitman">Flynn TW, Cleland JA, Whitman JM.  Users' guide to the musculoskeletal examination: Fundamentals for the evidence-based clinician.  United States: Evidence in Motion; 2008.</ref>&nbsp; More recent research has identified the anterior drawer test as a more effective test to identify chronic conditions, with a sensitivity and specificity of .92 and .91.<ref name="Bejaminse, Gokeler and van der Schans">Benjaminse A, Gokeler A van der Schans CP.  Clinical diagnosis of an anterior cruciate ligament rupture: a meta-analysis.  J Orthop Sports Phys Ther.  2006;36(5):267-88.</ref>
Sensitivity and specificity has been reported as .41-.91 and .86-1.0 respectively, with a -LR of .09-.62 and a +LR of 5.4-8.2.<ref name="Flynn, Cleland and Whitman">Flynn TW, Cleland JA, Whitman JM.  Users' guide to the musculoskeletal examination: Fundamentals for the evidence-based clinician.  United States: Evidence in Motion; 2008.</ref>&nbsp; More recent research has identified the anterior drawer test as a more effective test to identify chronic conditions, with a sensitivity and specificity of .92 and .91.<ref name="Bejaminse, Gokeler and van der Schans">Benjaminse A, Gokeler A van der Schans CP.  Clinical diagnosis of an anterior cruciate ligament rupture: a meta-analysis.  J Orthop Sports Phys Ther.  2006;36(5):267-88.</ref>  


== Resources  ==
== Resources  ==

Revision as of 01:01, 9 November 2009

Original Editor - Kathryn Schwartzkopf-Phifer

Lead Editors - Your name will be added here if you are a lead editor on this page.  Read more.

Purpose
[edit | edit source]

To test the integrity of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL)

Technique
[edit | edit source]

The patient is supine and the knee to be tested is flexed to approximately 90 degrees. The examiner then sits on the toes of the tested extremity to help stabilize it. The examiner grasps the proximal lower leg, approximately at the tibial plateau or joint line, and attempts to translate the lower leg anteriorly.

Evidence
[edit | edit source]

Sensitivity and specificity has been reported as .41-.91 and .86-1.0 respectively, with a -LR of .09-.62 and a +LR of 5.4-8.2.[1]  More recent research has identified the anterior drawer test as a more effective test to identify chronic conditions, with a sensitivity and specificity of .92 and .91.[2]

Resources[edit | edit source]

add any relevant resources here

Recent Related Research (from Pubmed)[edit | edit source]

Extension:RSS -- Error: Not a valid URL: Feed goes here!!|charset=UTF-8|short|max=10

References[edit | edit source]

References will automatically be added here, see adding references tutorial.

  1. Flynn TW, Cleland JA, Whitman JM. Users' guide to the musculoskeletal examination: Fundamentals for the evidence-based clinician. United States: Evidence in Motion; 2008.
  2. Benjaminse A, Gokeler A van der Schans CP. Clinical diagnosis of an anterior cruciate ligament rupture: a meta-analysis. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2006;36(5):267-88.