Diagnostic Approaches to Low Back Pain - Comparing Maitland, McKenzie and Movement Impairment Syndromes: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
'''Top Contributors''' - {{Special:Contributors/{{FULLPAGENAME}}}} | '''Top Contributors''' - {{Special:Contributors/{{FULLPAGENAME}}}} | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
== | == Introduction == | ||
== Sub Heading 2 == | == Sub Heading 2 == | ||
Revision as of 19:05, 3 January 2014
Welcome to Nottingham University's Spinal Rehabilitation Project. Students are currently creating this page. Please check back in January 2014 to see the finished result.
Original Editor - Katherine Portas, Lea Cobham and Anj Leung as part of the Nottingham University Spinal Rehabilitation Project
Top Contributors - Kathryn Priest, Katherine Portas, Angela Hiu-Wai Leung, Kim Jackson, Lea Cobham, Lucinda hampton, Admin, 127.0.0.1, Evan Thomas and Candace Goh
Introduction[edit | edit source]
Sub Heading 2[edit | edit source]
Maitland's Mobilisations
Suggested sections (please comment on):
- Basic concepts, techniques and any controversy
- Relevance, the usual patient that this suits?
- Anatomy - diagrams, pics etc to illustrate the concept?
- Pros
- Cons
- Any discussions you've found online / elsewhere that have a good debate going!
- Further resources:
- Further reading:
- References
Suggested things to include (please add to):
- Case Study to suit all approaches
- interviews with proponents of each style- to gain pros and cons and interesting viewing
Recent Related Research (from Pubmed)[edit | edit source]
Extension:RSS -- Error: Not a valid URL: Feed goes here!!|charset=UTF-8|short|max=10
References[edit | edit source]
References will automatically be added here, see adding references tutorial.
