Lumbar Discogenic Pain: Difference between revisions

m (Text replace - '- Your name will be added here if you are a lead editor on this page.' to ' ')
m (Text replace - ''''Lead Editors'''' to ''''Top Contributors''' - {{Special:Contributors/{{FULLPAGENAME}}}}')
Line 2: Line 2:
'''Original Editors ''' - [[User:Jon Ford|Jon Ford]] as part of the [[STOPS Project]].  
'''Original Editors ''' - [[User:Jon Ford|Jon Ford]] as part of the [[STOPS Project]].  


'''Lead Editors'''  href="Physiopedia:Editors">Read more.  
'''Top Contributors''' - {{Special:Contributors/{{FULLPAGENAME}}}} href="Physiopedia:Editors">Read more.  
</div>  
</div>  
The anatomy and function of the lumbar interverebral disc has been well described in texts<ref>Bogduk N. Clinical and radiological anatomy of the lumbar spine and sacrum. 5th ed. New York: Churchill Livingstone; 2012.</ref>. &nbsp;However the diagnosis and management of discogenic pain is controversial. &nbsp;The aim of this article is to synthesise the evidence-based literature from the practitioner's perspective to improve clinical decision making and patient outcomes.  
The anatomy and function of the lumbar interverebral disc has been well described in texts<ref>Bogduk N. Clinical and radiological anatomy of the lumbar spine and sacrum. 5th ed. New York: Churchill Livingstone; 2012.</ref>. &nbsp;However the diagnosis and management of discogenic pain is controversial. &nbsp;The aim of this article is to synthesise the evidence-based literature from the practitioner's perspective to improve clinical decision making and patient outcomes.  

Revision as of 16:45, 14 June 2013

Original Editors - Jon Ford as part of the STOPS Project.

Top Contributors - Evan Thomas, Admin, Jon Ford, Kim Jackson, Anne-Laure Vanherwegen, WikiSysop, 127.0.0.1, Wanda van Niekerk and Rachael Lowe href="Physiopedia:Editors">Read more.

The anatomy and function of the lumbar interverebral disc has been well described in texts[1].  However the diagnosis and management of discogenic pain is controversial.  The aim of this article is to synthesise the evidence-based literature from the practitioner's perspective to improve clinical decision making and patient outcomes.


Much of the controversy around discogenic pain comes from confusion and misinformation on diagnosis.  Radiological tests such as CT scan and MRI are able to image the external and internal morphology of the intervertebral disc.  However such changes in isolation do not predict the presence or absence of lumbar and/or related leg symptoms

References[edit | edit source]

  1. Bogduk N. Clinical and radiological anatomy of the lumbar spine and sacrum. 5th ed. New York: Churchill Livingstone; 2012.