Locked-In Syndrome: A Case Study

Abstract

The following case study describes a patient with Locked-In Syndrome (LIS), a disorder of consciousness typically caused by an acquired brain injury. Patients present with tetraplegia and anarthria, despite unaffected/slightly affected cognition. The purpose of this case study is to outline expected clinical findings of a patient with LIS and recommended intervention strategies based on the current literature. Based on the patient's presentation and evidence based intervention strategies, a treatment plan that focuses on motor control recovery through the use of tilt table training, treadmill therapy and repetitive sensorimotor training (RST) is emphasized to improve the patient's quality of life, ability to communicate, and regain some independence in mobility and activities of daily living.

Introduction

LIS is a disorder of consciousness that is caused by damage to the brainstem, specifically the ventral pons [1]. Damage to this area can be caused by a stroke (hemorrhagic or ischemic) or trauma [1]. Patients with LIS will experience quadriplegia and the inability to speak, leaving them feeling “locked” inside their body [1]. Despite these significant motor losses, the function of their ocular muscles is preserved [1]. Paired with their intact cognitive awareness, patients can communicate through blinking, and have the ability to move their eyes vertically [1]. LIS has three different subtypes, classic, partial, and complete, which categorize the patient’s presentation based on their motor and communication impairments. Classic LIS presents tetraplegia and anarthria. Patients with partial LIS have symptoms of classic as well as some voluntary movement other than vertical eye movement. Those with complete LIS have complete tetraplegia and are unable to move their eyes or blink, thus losing the ability to communicate.  

Disruption to the corticospinal tracts and corticobulbar tracts are responsible for the quadriplegia and anarthria seen, respectively [1]. Patients with LIS will also experience changes to their respiratory function, demonstrating abnormal breathing patterns such as Cheyne-Stokes and apnea [1].  

To verify that the patient has a ventral pons lesion their vestibular ocular reflex will remain intact. They will demonstrate a positive Babinski sign indicating corticospinal tract damage. In addition, they will exhibit intact pupillary light reflex, all confirming their locked-in syndrome is due to a ventral pons lesion. (surdyke, 2017)

Patient Characteristics

Mr. Gary is a 38-year-old male who lives with his wife and three kids in a three-story home backing onto Lake Ontario. Mr. Gary is a landlord of multiple apartment buildings at Queen’s University and a high school basketball coach. In his free time, he enjoys playing basketball with his old high school basketball teammates, who scrimmage every Saturday afternoon. 2 weeks ago, Mr. Gary came to the hospital with coordination deficits, dizziness, headache, and aphagia, and it was determined that he had a basilar artery occlusion impacting the brainstem, specifically the ventral region of the pons. Over the course of his hospital stay, he has progressively been showing signs of deterioration and decreased consciousness. At present, Mr. Gary has minimal body movements, only slight movements at his extremities. However, he still demonstrates pupillary responses, cognitive functioning and voluntary eye movements. Based on the current information and expert opinions, Mr. Gary was diagnosed with partial locked-in syndrome.

Examination Findings

When evaluating Mr. Gary, the following problem list was formed:

Component of the ICF Model	Problem(s)
Body Structure and Function	Mr. Gary is unable to produce voluntary muscle movements of the trunk and extremities leading to difficulties executing physical activities done during a typical day (e.g. walking, stairs, bending over).
Activity Limitation	Loss of the ability to perform basic hygiene tasks such as brushing teeth, washing face.
Participation Restriction	Unable to take part in meaningful interactions such as driving his children to school and partaking in his work, limiting his ability to contribute to his family, which may lead to loss of purpose and depression.

To target Mr. Gary's goals, we assigned an outcome measure to each portion of the ICF model to accurately and efficiently track his progress during the treatment intervention and ensure we reach his overall objectives.

To evaluate this problem list, the RAND 36-Item Health Survey can be used. The RAND-36 is an instrument that assesses health-related Quality of Life (HRQoL). This survey evaluates 8 various concepts such as physical functioning, role limitations due to physical health problems, bodily pain, and more.  The RAND 36 survey has been shown to be both reliable and valid for evaluating HRQoL in individuals who have had a stroke and has been used extensively for persons with LIS. As such, to evaluate the problems identified under Mr. Gary’s body structure and functions, the RAND-36 is a valid, reliable and appropriate tool to assess his physical functioning and voluntary muscle movement.(Svernling, 2019)

An evidence-based outcome measure that will help establish and monitor Mr. Gary’s activity limitations and ability to be discharged from the hospital is the Functional Independence Measure (FIM). The FIM is an 18-item test which measures an individual’s level of disability. The test develops a motor score and cognitive score. The motor portion examines the patient’s ability to do activities such as showering, walking, using stairs, and the toilet, all correlating to his activity limitations indicated in the problem list (Ferrucci, 2007). This information determines whether we are improving upon Mr. Gary’s activity goals/impairments and when he will be ready for discharge from the hospital.

The Impact on Participation and Autonomy Questionnaire is an evidence-based outcome measure that will adequately analyze Mr. Gray's participation goals. This questionnaire is composed of 5 different domains: autonomy indoors, autonomy outdoors, social life and relationships, family role and education and work (Svernling, 2019). This questionnaire will give us a baseline on where he is regarding his participation goals of returning to work and hanging out with his family. Then, over time with our treatment interventions, we can utilize this questionnaire again to ensure we satisfy our patients' main concerns and objectives.

Common co-morbidities seen in LIS

It is well known that respiratory failure is a significant comorbidity among patients with Locked-in syndrome. Due to the reduced respiratory function, absent cough reflex, and the nature of being immobilized, there is an increased risk of secretion accumulation and aspiration (Newsome & Melton, 2023; Halan et al., 2021). As a result, the leading causes of death in patients with LIS is pneumonia and atelectasis (Halan et al., 2021). Thus, it is vital to screen Mr. Gary for respiratory failure and assist with ventilation as required (e.g., breathing exercises, frequent position changes) (Schnetzer et al., 2021). Additionally, depression is a possible comorbidity seen in patients with LIS. Patients may feel depressed due to the prolonged stay in a hospital, the increased burden on family members, and the impression that their quality of life is significantly worse than it used to be (Smith & Delargy, 2005). As such, we must screen Mr. Gary for depressive symptoms so that referrals can be made to help treat them quickly and effectively.

Clinical Impression

Mr. Gary is a 38-year-old male presenting with partial LIS following an occlusion to the basilar artery. He has an overall loss of motor function, presenting as tetraplegia. He is cognitively intact and demonstrates his ability to communicate through blinking and vertical eye movement. Through observation, Mr. Gary has evidence of slight voluntary flexion and extension of his fingers and toes, however there are no other signs of body movement at this point. He displays signs of spasticity bilaterally in both arms, seen with a flexor movement synergy.  

Prognostically, it is advantageous that the patient is young, and that rehabilitation can begin within the acute stage. Additionally, it is a good sign that Mr. Gary is already showing signs of motor movement, indicating the potential for recovery in his case. It will be essential to monitor for signs of respiratory failure, which is common in patients with LIS and can impact Mr. Gary’s prognostic timeline. As of now, Mr. Gary falls within the minimal recovery classification, and it is predicted that through rehabilitation, he will progress to moderate recovery as he gains more voluntary function of his distal extremities.  

Intervention

Treatment Goals

Short Term Goal: To prepare Mr Gary for wheelchair mobility, he will improve his upright posture tolerance as measured through increasing time tolerated on tilt table at larger angles of inclination in the next 3 weeks. Tolerance will be determined by light headedness, dizziness, and/or a decrease in blood pressure greater than 20 mmHg.

Long Term Goal: Mr. Gary will regain motor control of voluntary hand movements such as functional grasp, as measured through patient’s ability to grasp different objects of varying sizes, shapes and textures with accuracy and repetition within 2 months. Recovery of motor control can be applied to independent use of an electric wheelchair joystick and the ability to use electronic communication methods to improve activity limitations, patient quality of life and independence.

Treatment Plan

The treatment intervention for Mr. Gary will begin immediately, as early extensive physiotherapy is recommended for patients with LIS (Casanova/Physiopedia). Immediate and aggressive therapy, 5-6 times per week, has been found to improve functional recovery and decrease the severity of LIS and mortality rate (physiopedia - lockedin). Rehabilitation interventions for LIS should focus on upright tolerance training followed by balance and mobility (Farr et al., 2021). In addition, interventions should focus on distal motor control, as motor recovery tends to occur from distal to proximal (Casanova, ). The treatment program for Mr. Gary will begin with using a tilt table to improve upright postural tolerance. Tilt tables are a common therapeutic approach for patients with LIS (Farr et al., 2021). Tilt table training has been shown to improve trunk stability, strengthen cervical muscles, and maintain flexibility of the ankles (Farr et al., 2021). The treatment program will begin with gradually raising Mr. Gary to 60 degrees and having him sustain this inclination for a minimum of 5 minutes without signs of intolerance. The program will progress with 10 degree intervals from 60 to 90 degrees as tolerated by Mr. Gary. This protocol was supported by a study of a tilt table on improving functioning in patients in the acute stage following stroke (Baltz, 2013). Once Mr. Gary can sustain 90 degrees of inclination without symptoms of intolerance, the physiotherapy team will progress to treadmill therapy with body weight support.

Research has found that for patients with LIS, once they can tolerate an upright position, training on a treadmill with body weight support is essential for improving mobility (Farr et al., 2021). Treadmill training with body weight support has been found to improve postural control, physical endurance, and mobility for patients with LIS (Farr et al., 2021). The treatment program will involve the treadmill therapy with body weight support, where Mr. Gary will be secured by a harness and attached to a suspension system where two physiotherapists will assist him with walking movements. The treadmill will have handrails attached in front and on either side to promote grasping for Mr. Gary. The gait velocity will begin at 0.2 km per hour to achieve the walking movement and progressed to 1-1.2 km per hour for a 15-20 minute session based on responses from Mr. Gary. Treadmill therapy has been found to be effective with 0.2-1.2 km per hour speeds for approximately 20-minute sessions for about 10 weeks for patients with partial LIS after stroke (Hoyer et al.). This protocol improved postural control, allowed patients to maintain a standing position over time, and improved overall physical functioning (Hoyer et al.).

Furthermore, in order to address Mr Gary’s long-term goal of regaining motor control of the upper extremities repetitive sensorimotor training will be used. Repetitive sensorimotor training (RST) encourages patients to repeatedly attempt to complete specific movements of the shoulder, elbow, wrist, and fingers respectively. In instances where the patient is unable to complete the motion throughout the full range of motion, the therapist may assist the patient throughout the movement. As the patient begins to progress through larger ranges of motion, the therapist can progress the RST protocol by challenging the patient with gravity resisted movements or even the implementation of additional resistance. With Mr Gary, minimal voluntary movement was seen in both upper extremities therefore intensive RST will be completed with both upper extremities in order to regain as much functional motor control. In LIS patients recover distal extremity function prior to proximal therefore the initial RST sessions will involve movements specific to the fingers and wrist and over time progress to include elbow and shoulder movements. A review conducted by Papadopoulou et al. was completed in order to determine the best clinical practice guidelines for patients with LIS. Their research determined that RST was an effective treatment for patients with partial LIS to recover functional motor control of paretic upper extremities while also significantly shortening the expected rate of recovery. An additional study demonstrated significant increase in patients upper extremity function through RST as seen through increased ability to complete ADL’s such as shaving and teeth brushing without the use an additional aid.

Specific RST protocol for Mr Gary will begin with 60 minute sessions 5-6 times per week. The therapist will encourage Mr Gary to complete large movements of the fingers and wrist into flexion and extension repeatedly in a gravity eliminated plane of motion. My Gary will complete as much of the movements as possible autonomously, if needed the therapist will complete the movement throughout the full range of motion. Over time as motor control begins to improve the therapist will position Mr Gary so that the joints will be moving through a gravity resisted plane of motion, increasing the difficulty of the motion for the patient. Additional progressions will begin to include movements of the elbow and shoulder joints as well as beginning to repeat functional motions such as reaching and grasping techniques.

The goal of RST therapy with Mr Gary is to improve motor control of his upper extremities so that he may be able to complete functional activities such as operating an electric wheelchair for mobility, brushing his teeth, combing his hair, shaving, assisting with dressing etc. In the long term, technologies such as the Bioness H2000 can help to enhance mobility and daily function with Mr Gary.

Intervention	Parameters	Progression
Tilt Table	x 5-6/week inclination from 0 degrees increasing 10 degrees every 5 minutes (symptom permitting).	Over multiple sessions patient to be able to tolerate 90 degrees of inclination for 5+ minutes.
Treadmill Therapy with Body Weight Support	x 5-6/week initial gait speed = 0.2 km/hour assist x2 of therapist moving lower limbs in proper gait pattern (symptom permitting). Walking time per session = 10 minutes	Over multiple session therapists will increase gait speed up to 1.2 km/hour (increasing at 0.2 km/hour increments between sessions). Total talking time will increase to 20 minutes per session (increasing at 2–5-minute increments)
Repetitive Sensorimotor Training (RST)	x5-6/week Large movements of the fingers and wrist into flexion and extension repeatedly in a gravity eliminated plane of motion Treatment time = 60 minutes	Over multiple sessions the patient will begin to move more proximal upper extremity joints such as elbow and shoulders. Movements will become larger, move into gravity resisted plane and eventually movements with the addition of external  resistance to motion. Functional movements such as reaching and grasping should be included as patient ability increases.

Adverse Events

Potential adverse events that can occur with patients who have LIS may include low blood pressure, dizziness, and lightheadedness. If a patient reports any of these symptoms during therapy, for example when using the tilt table intervention, the physiotherapy team could alter the parameters to decrease intensity for the patient. Specifically, if the patient is not tolerating the 10-degree increments to upright positioning, the physiotherapy team could use 5-degree increments. Additionally, the team could increase time spent at each increment to allow the patient’s body to better adapt before moving to the next increment.

If they experience these symptoms during the treadmill training, the physiotherapist can decrease the frequency or length of treadmill sessions to prevent adverse effects from occurring. During treadmill therapy the patient must be in upright standing position therefore it is possible that the initial transfer from sit to stand will provoke patient symptoms; the physiotherapist can eliminate this risk by slowly transferring the patient from sit to standing position to allow the patients body to adapt to the new position.

Furthermore, it is possible that fatigue may be induced in this population, due to the high intensity and frequency of treatment protocols. To reduce the risk of excessive fatigue, the physiotherapy team can decrease intensity and frequency of the intervention as necessary and ensure that frequent monitoring of perceived rates of exertion are noted using a pre-determined communication method with the patient. Physiotherapists must implement principles of pacing, prioritizing and planning to maximize therapy sessions for optimal patient outcomes.

Innovative Technology to Enhance Treatment Interventions

Utilizing innovative technology-mediated tools can enhance the treatment approach for individuals with LIS and help restore some of their lost motor function.

The Armeo Spring Program is a limb robotic utilized for upper extremity training. This machine connects to a virtual reality system with varying degrees of difficulty (Colomer, 2013). The patient puts their arm into an exoskeleton which supports them proximally to distally. They will then proceed to complete functional tasks based on what the virtual reality is (Colomer, 2013). This program has demonstrated efficacy in increasing accuracy and time of movement initiation in individuals with LIS. Completing repetitive movements with constant visual feedback enables the patient improvements in self-monitoring, sensory feedback and upper limb motor function control (Halan, 2021). The program allows patients to use any remaining motor functions they have and continue to work and progress on reaching and grasping movements in a stimulating and functional environment (Bartolo, 2014).

Another innovative technology-mediated tool beneficial in individuals with LIS is Bioness H200. Bioness H200 is an extremity neuroprosthesis used for functional recovery of grasp in the upper extremities. The benefits of using this machine are that it can facilitate functional arm use, reduces spasticity, improves grip strength and allows for an active range of motion in the upper limb (McNair, 2019).

Lastly, treadmill therapy with body weight support is another innovative tool utilized with this population. This therapy can increase their motor function and postural control. With treadmill therapy, it can start with more passive movements and, throughout their recovery, transition to more independent body support (Cureus, 2021). Overall, treadmill therapy with body weight support allows individuals with locked-in syndrome the ability to be upright and walk when otherwise would be impossible (Hoyer, 2009).

All three of these interventions can be beneficial to use for Mr. Gary to regain his functional status and help bring him closer to participating in activities he wishes to do so again.  

Opportunities and Challenges of Utilizing Innovative Technology

An opportunity for using innovative robotic interventions is they can get the patient more engaged and make treatment more entertaining. In addition, the machine itself can change its sensitivity based on the severity of the locked-in syndrome, essentially tailoring the difficulty of the movements based on the patient’s current status (Colomer, 2013). This feature provides a more individualized treatment plan for each patient, creating better results and enabling a more effective intervention plan.

With implementing innovative technology, there will be barriers to incorporating it in clinical practice. The first is feasibility. With new and innovative robotic technology, they cost a lot of money to produce, which many clinics don’t have the capacities to afford. In addition, the patient will most likely be unable to afford the robotic and, therefore, won’t be able to practice these techniques at home only when they come in for physiotherapy.

A way to mitigate this situation would be to provide alternative treatments with similar benefits. For example, a NMES machine can induce muscle contractions and potentially target the same goals. Another method would be to develop funding or apply for different funding for the patient, as this is a beneficial technique for individuals with locked-in syndrome. Lastly, you can always refer a patient to another clinic that offers these machines.

Test Your Knowledge

Question 1:

Question 2:

Question 3: