Male Urogenital Distress Inventory (MUDI): Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
m (Text replace - 'Read more.' to ' ') |
||
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
'''Original Editor '''- [[User:Kirsten Ryan|Kirsten Ryan]] | '''Original Editor '''- [[User:Kirsten Ryan|Kirsten Ryan]] | ||
'''Lead Editors''' - Your name will be added here if you are a lead editor on this page. | '''Lead Editors''' - Your name will be added here if you are a lead editor on this page. | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
== Objective<br> == | == Objective<br> == |
Revision as of 15:56, 14 June 2013
Original Editor - Kirsten Ryan
Lead Editors - Your name will be added here if you are a lead editor on this page.
Objective
[edit | edit source]
The Male Urogenital Distress Inventory (MUDI) can be used in clinical practice and research to measure the effect of interventions for urinary incontinence on health-related quality of life in men.[1]
Intended Population
[edit | edit source]
Community-dwelling, racially diverse men with continence problems.[1]
Method of Use[edit | edit source]
The MUDI contains 27 items that are each coded on the following 5-point scale: 1 = symptom not present, 2 = symptom present but not bothersome, 3 = symptom present and slightly bothersome, 4 = symptom present and moderately bothersome, and 5 = symptom present and greatly bothersome. Total scores range from 27 (no symptoms) to 135 (maximum degree of associated bother).[1]
It takes about 20 minutes to complete by either self-administration or interview.[1]
Reference
[edit | edit source]
Evidence[edit | edit source]
Reliability[edit | edit source]
Internal consistency score with Cronbach's coefficient was .89.[1]
Validity[edit | edit source]
Content validity agreement scores were 97% for item clarity and 95% for item fit.[1]
Responsiveness[edit | edit source]
Miscellaneous
[edit | edit source]
The MUDI captures the dimension of physical health, focusing on bother from multiple symptoms associated with urinary incontinence.
Further testing should be done on test-retest reliability and sensitivity to change. Concurrent validity should also be evaluated further by comparing to a generic health-related quality of life instrument.[1]
Links[edit | edit source]
Recent Related Research (from Pubmed)[edit | edit source]
Failed to load RSS feed from http://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/erss.cgi?rss_guid=1VmNOZgUnBp2VRciqBFlwxpFYYHgWHi0mK4-SxyUW-MT1scgbG|charset=UTF-8|short|max=10: Error parsing XML for RSS
References[edit | edit source]
References will automatically be added here, see adding references tutorial.