Cervical Distraction Test: Difference between revisions

No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 4: Line 4:
'''Lead Editors''' - Your name will be added here if you are a lead editor on this page.  [[Physiopedia:Editors|Read more.]]  
'''Lead Editors''' - Your name will be added here if you are a lead editor on this page.  [[Physiopedia:Editors|Read more.]]  
</div>  
</div>  
== Purpose<br> ==
== Purpose<br> ==


To test for the presence of cervical radiculopathy.<ref name="Users' guide">Flynn TW, Cleland JA, Whitman JM. Users' guide to the musculoskeletal examination. United States; Evidence in Motion:2008.</ref>&nbsp;<ref name="Malange et al">Malange GA,Landes P, Nadler SF. Provocation tests in the cervical spine examination: historical basis and scientific analyses. Pain Physician. 2003;6:199-205</ref><br>
To test for the presence of cervical radiculopathy.<ref name="Users' guide">Flynn TW, Cleland JA, Whitman JM. Users' guide to the musculoskeletal examination. United States; Evidence in Motion:2008.</ref>&nbsp;<ref name="Malange et al">Malange GA,Landes P, Nadler SF. Provocation tests in the cervical spine examination: historical basis and scientific analyses. Pain Physician. 2003;6:199-205</ref><br>  


== Technique<br> ==
== Technique<br> ==


Patient lies supine and the neck is comfortably positioned. Examiner securely grasps the patient's head under the occiput and chin and gradually applies an axial traction.&nbsp;  
Patient lies supine and the neck is comfortably positioned. Examiner securely grasps the patient's head under the occiput and chin and gradually applies an axial traction.&nbsp;  
Line 14: Line 14:
A positive test is the reduction or eliminatin of symptoms.<ref name="Wainner and Gill">Wainner RS, Gill H. Diagnosis and nonoperative management of cervical radiculopathy. J Ortho Sports PT.2000 Dec;30(12):728-744.</ref>  
A positive test is the reduction or eliminatin of symptoms.<ref name="Wainner and Gill">Wainner RS, Gill H. Diagnosis and nonoperative management of cervical radiculopathy. J Ortho Sports PT.2000 Dec;30(12):728-744.</ref>  


<br>
<br>  


&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; [[Image:Cervical distraction.jpg|Image:Cervical_distraction.jpg]]
&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; [[Image:Cervical distraction.jpg|Image:Cervical_distraction.jpg]]  


== Evidence  ==
== Evidence  ==


&nbsp;&nbsp; '''Cervical Distraction Test'''
&nbsp;&nbsp; '''Cervical Distraction Test'''  


Sensitivity&nbsp;&nbsp; .44
Sensitivity&nbsp;&nbsp; .44  


Specificity&nbsp;&nbsp; .97<ref name="Rubinstein et al">Rubinstein SM, Pool JJM, van Tulder MW, Riphagen II, de Vet HCW. A systemic review of the diagnostic accuracy of provocative tests of the neck for diagnosing cervical radiculopathy. Eur Spine J.2007;16:307-319.</ref>
Specificity&nbsp;&nbsp; .97<ref name="Rubinstein et al">Rubinstein SM, Pool JJM, van Tulder MW, Riphagen II, de Vet HCW. A systemic review of the diagnostic accuracy of provocative tests of the neck for diagnosing cervical radiculopathy. Eur Spine J.2007;16:307-319.</ref>  


Reliability&nbsp; .88<ref name="Wainner et al">Wainner RS, Fritz JM, Irrgang JJ, Boninger ML, Delitto A, Allison S. Reliability and diagnostic accuracy of the clinical examination and patient self-report measures for cervical radiculopathy. Spine. 2003;28(1):52-62.</ref>
Reliability&nbsp; .88<ref name="Wainner et al">Wainner RS, Fritz JM, Irrgang JJ, Boninger ML, Delitto A, Allison S. Reliability and diagnostic accuracy of the clinical examination and patient self-report measures for cervical radiculopathy. Spine. 2003;28(1):52-62.</ref>  


== Resources  ==
== Resources  ==
Line 34: Line 34:
== Recent Related Research (from [http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/ Pubmed])  ==
== Recent Related Research (from [http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/ Pubmed])  ==
<div class="researchbox">
<div class="researchbox">
<rss>Feed goes here!!|charset=UTF-8|short|max=10</rss>  
<rss>http://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/erss.cgi?rss_guid=1FwYT_rsr_VrWUTFMSNBgXGbaCdJuQgR9EMkejNqgl_q0UJQ2F|charset=UTF-8|short|max=10</rss>  
</div>  
</div>  
== References  ==
== References  ==

Revision as of 19:45, 8 December 2009

Original Editor - Your name will be added here if you created the original content for this page.

Lead Editors - Your name will be added here if you are a lead editor on this page.  Read more.

Purpose
[edit | edit source]

To test for the presence of cervical radiculopathy.[1] [2]

Technique
[edit | edit source]

Patient lies supine and the neck is comfortably positioned. Examiner securely grasps the patient's head under the occiput and chin and gradually applies an axial traction. 

A positive test is the reduction or eliminatin of symptoms.[3]


                                                                  Image:Cervical_distraction.jpg

Evidence[edit | edit source]

   Cervical Distraction Test

Sensitivity   .44

Specificity   .97[4]

Reliability  .88[5]

Resources[edit | edit source]

add any relevant resources here

Recent Related Research (from Pubmed)[edit | edit source]

Failed to load RSS feed from http://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/erss.cgi?rss_guid=1FwYT_rsr_VrWUTFMSNBgXGbaCdJuQgR9EMkejNqgl_q0UJQ2F|charset=UTF-8|short|max=10: Error parsing XML for RSS

References[edit | edit source]

References will automatically be added here, see adding references tutorial.

  1. Flynn TW, Cleland JA, Whitman JM. Users' guide to the musculoskeletal examination. United States; Evidence in Motion:2008.
  2. Malange GA,Landes P, Nadler SF. Provocation tests in the cervical spine examination: historical basis and scientific analyses. Pain Physician. 2003;6:199-205
  3. Wainner RS, Gill H. Diagnosis and nonoperative management of cervical radiculopathy. J Ortho Sports PT.2000 Dec;30(12):728-744.
  4. Rubinstein SM, Pool JJM, van Tulder MW, Riphagen II, de Vet HCW. A systemic review of the diagnostic accuracy of provocative tests of the neck for diagnosing cervical radiculopathy. Eur Spine J.2007;16:307-319.
  5. Wainner RS, Fritz JM, Irrgang JJ, Boninger ML, Delitto A, Allison S. Reliability and diagnostic accuracy of the clinical examination and patient self-report measures for cervical radiculopathy. Spine. 2003;28(1):52-62.