Diagnostic Imaging: Best Practice: Difference between revisions

(Created page with "{{subst:New Page}}")
 
mNo edit summary
 
(3 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
<div class="noeditbox">This article or area is currently under construction and may only be partially complete. Please come back soon to see the finished work! ({{REVISIONDAY}}/{{REVISIONMONTH}}/{{REVISIONYEAR}})</div>
<div class="editorbox">
<div class="editorbox">
'''Original Editor '''- [[User:User Name|User Name]]
'''Original Editor '''- [[User:Melissa Coetsee|Melissa Coetsee]]


'''Top Contributors''' - {{Special:Contributors/{{FULLPAGENAME}}}}  &nbsp;   
'''Top Contributors''' - {{Special:Contributors/{{FULLPAGENAME}}}}  &nbsp;   
</div>  
</div>  
== Introduction ==
== Introduction ==
Diagnostic imaging has evolved significantly over the past decades, and has become an important component of the health care system.
The use of diagnostic imaging has doubled in the United States over a 16 year period<ref name=":0">Ford B, Dore M, Moullet P. [https://www.aafp.org/pubs/afp/issues/2021/0101/p42.pdf Diagnostic imaging: appropriate and safe use. American Family Physician.] 2021 Jan 1;103(1):42-50.</ref>
Inappropriate diagnostic imaging is a major contributor to unnecessary health care expenditure and overtreatment. Improved awareness of the risks, benefits and evidence-based recommendations can improve decision-making and avoid unnecessary imaging.<ref name=":0" />
'''Potential factors that influence unnecessary imaging'''<ref>Hall AM, Aubrey-Bassler K, Thorne B, Maher CG. [https://www.bmj.com/content/372/bmj.n291 Do not routinely offer imaging for uncomplicated low back pain.] bmj. 2021 Feb 12;372.</ref><ref name=":02">Webster BS, Bauer AZ, Choi Y, Cifuentes M, Pransky GS. [https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4235393/ Iatrogenic consequences of early magnetic resonance imaging in acute, work-related, disabling low back pain.] Spine. 2013 Oct 15;38(22):1939-46.</ref>''':'''
* Patient expectations/requests, and the need to find proof that their pain is real
* Clinician's fear of missing severe pathology
* Lack of awareness of current guidelines
* Lack of awareness of the harm of unnecessary imaging
* Belief that imaging will reassure patients
* A lack of access to conservative management options
These factors need to be managed with good communication and evidence based guidelines.<ref name=":02" />
== Risks of Inappropriate Imaging ==
=== Radiation Exposure ===
=== Iatrogenic Effects ===
=== "Incidentalomas" ===
Incidental abnormal radiographic findings occur in 20-50% of imaging studies.<ref name=":0" />Discernment is required to determine when such findings require further investigation or pose no threat in the absence of symptoms.


== Sub Heading 2 ==
== Asymptomatic Imaging ==


== Sub Heading 3 ==
=== The Evidence ===


== Resources  ==
== Clinical Recommendations ==
*bulleted list
 
*x
=== Musculoskeletal Imaging ===
or
 
=== MRI Contra-indications ===


#numbered list
== Conclusion ==
#x


== Resources  ==
*[https://www.acr.org/Clinical-Resources/ACR-Appropriateness-Criteria ACR Appropriateness Criteria:] Evidence-based guidelines to guide imaging decision-making
*[https://www.xrayrisk.com/calculator/calculator American Society of Radiologic Technologists:] Radiation risk calculator
*[https://www.imagegently.org/ Image Gently]: Free resources to reduce unnecessary imaging in children
*[https://www.imagewisely.org/ Image Wisely:] Free resources to reduce unnecessary imaging in adults
== References  ==
== References  ==


<references />
<references />

Latest revision as of 18:35, 21 March 2024

This article or area is currently under construction and may only be partially complete. Please come back soon to see the finished work! (21/03/2024)

Original Editor - Melissa Coetsee

Top Contributors - Melissa Coetsee  

Introduction[edit | edit source]

Diagnostic imaging has evolved significantly over the past decades, and has become an important component of the health care system.

The use of diagnostic imaging has doubled in the United States over a 16 year period[1]

Inappropriate diagnostic imaging is a major contributor to unnecessary health care expenditure and overtreatment. Improved awareness of the risks, benefits and evidence-based recommendations can improve decision-making and avoid unnecessary imaging.[1]

Potential factors that influence unnecessary imaging[2][3]:

  • Patient expectations/requests, and the need to find proof that their pain is real
  • Clinician's fear of missing severe pathology
  • Lack of awareness of current guidelines
  • Lack of awareness of the harm of unnecessary imaging
  • Belief that imaging will reassure patients
  • A lack of access to conservative management options

These factors need to be managed with good communication and evidence based guidelines.[3]

Risks of Inappropriate Imaging[edit | edit source]

Radiation Exposure[edit | edit source]

Iatrogenic Effects[edit | edit source]

"Incidentalomas"[edit | edit source]

Incidental abnormal radiographic findings occur in 20-50% of imaging studies.[1]Discernment is required to determine when such findings require further investigation or pose no threat in the absence of symptoms.

Asymptomatic Imaging[edit | edit source]

The Evidence[edit | edit source]

Clinical Recommendations[edit | edit source]

Musculoskeletal Imaging[edit | edit source]

MRI Contra-indications[edit | edit source]

Conclusion[edit | edit source]

Resources[edit | edit source]

References[edit | edit source]

  1. 1.0 1.1 1.2 Ford B, Dore M, Moullet P. Diagnostic imaging: appropriate and safe use. American Family Physician. 2021 Jan 1;103(1):42-50.
  2. Hall AM, Aubrey-Bassler K, Thorne B, Maher CG. Do not routinely offer imaging for uncomplicated low back pain. bmj. 2021 Feb 12;372.
  3. 3.0 3.1 Webster BS, Bauer AZ, Choi Y, Cifuentes M, Pransky GS. Iatrogenic consequences of early magnetic resonance imaging in acute, work-related, disabling low back pain. Spine. 2013 Oct 15;38(22):1939-46.