Foot and Ankle Joint Mobilisation for the Gait Loading Strategy
Original Editor - Ewa Jaraczewska based on the course by Ari Kaplan
Top Contributors - Ewa Jaraczewska
Introduction
The goal of foot and ankle joint mobilisation is to restore the essential joint mobility required for an efficient, force-absorbing loading strategy during gait. During loading, the foot and ankle absorb impact forces upon initial contact and midstance through coordinated movements, before storing and returning energy during propulsion.[1]
This page discusses how to select appropriate mobilisation or thrust techniques while refining hand placement, vector force, and patient positioning. It helps clinicians understand why a specific technique is indicated for a given patient presentation.
Benefits of Joint Mobilisation to Improve Ankle Dorsiflexion
Joint mobilisation therapy provides several benefits for improving ankle dorsiflexion and overall mobility. Research demonstrates that multiple treatment sessions of manual therapy improve functional ankle performance more effectively than a single application. [2] [3]Joint mobilisation offers short-term benefits for individuals with chronic ankle sprains. [4] [3]Furthermore, manual therapy can produce modest improvements in weight-bearing dorsiflexion immediately after the intervention, with more substantial benefits observed following repeated applications, particularly among older adults and protocols with higher treatment frequencies.[5][3]
Joint Mobilisation Considerations
Application of joint mobilisation techniques must remain pain-free at all times. While patients may experience pressure, a mild ache, or a subtle stretch during movement, any substantial discomfort indicates they should stop pushing forward. Instead, clinicians should immediately evaluate and adjust their force, direction, and hand positioning.[6]
Do not mobilise or manipulate:[7]
- An unstable ankle (e.g., acute grade III ligament injury)
- A postoperative ankle with movement restrictions
- A patient with osteoporosis (avoid manipulation/thrust techniques specifically)
- An acutely sprained anterior talo-fibular ligament (ATFL) in the direction that would further stretch the injured structure (e.g., avoid anterior talocrural mobilisation in an eversion/inversion sprain with ATFL involvement)
Contraindications always override arthrokinematic logic. If a technique is contraindicated, it is contraindicated regardless of how "correct" it seems biomechanically.[7]
Assessment Before Mobilisation
A structured physiotherapy assessment tells the clinician what to mobilise and how hard to push. Clinicians should work through the staged assessment consisting of functional screen, AROM, PROM, and closed chain. It allows them to identify where the restriction happens before they ever put their hands on a joint to treat it:
Functional screen: Watch the patient walk or squat. This observation helps to generate hypotheses and narrows down what to test next.[8]
Active range of motion: Assess active dorsiflexion and plantar flexion. Observe movement quality: "Does the foot deviate from the sagittal plane, or does it evert/pronate excessively instead of dorsiflexing cleanly"?[9] [10]
Passive range of motion: Compare the quality of passive motion to active motion, and note tissue resistance. Two joints can hit the same end-range number, but one may meet firm resistance early while the other moves freely to end-range. This situation represents very different clinical pictures, even with identical ROM measurements.[11]
Closed-chain dorsiflexion (functional load): To quantify dorsiflexion range of motion in a closed kinetic chain position, the weight-bearing lunge test (WBLT) is recommended. [12] With the patient in a lunge position, bring the knee forward until the heel starts to lift, then back off slightly. Measure tibial angle with an inclinometer. A typical benchmark is 40–45°, though the target should be adjusted to the demands of the patient's goals (walking vs running vs squatting requires progressively more dorsiflexion). Watch for compensation, such as knee drifting medially or excessive rear/midfoot collapse. Cue the patient to keep the "knee over second toe," or block the compensation manually so you can see whether true sagittal-plane dorsiflexion is available.[9]
The Arthrokinematic Model
For clarity, this section discusses mobilisation techniques using classic arthrokinematics, meaning joint mobilisation techniques are chosen based on the shape of the articulating bone surfaces. For example, dorsiflexion requires a posterior glide of the talus within the mortise. This is a useful starting framework, but it is not the whole picture.[7]
Mobilisation is unlikely to be meaningfully stretching connective tissue in most sessions. What is more likely happening is a neurophysiological change, an alteration in tone, protective guarding, and joint-muscle feedback, which is why changes can occur rapidly, within a single session. [13] [14]This situation has a practical implication: if a technique performed in the "correct" arthrokinematic direction is not producing the expected change, the clinician is not locked into that direction. Trying the opposite glide can still produce a positive result, because the input to the nervous system, not the mechanical stretch, is often what matters. The exception, again, is contraindications: the clinician should never trade arthrokinematic logic for a direction that would stress an already-compromised structure.[7]
Clinician's Guide for Foot and Ankle Mobilisation Techniques
Distal Tibiofibular Mortise (Widening for Dorsiflexion)
To accept the talus into dorsiflexion, the mortise itself needs to open. This happens through:[7]
- Internal rotation of the tibia — felt as the medial malleolus gliding posteriorly
- Posterior glide of the fibula — felt at the lateral malleolus
Medial or lateral malleolus posterior glide technique : Stabilise one side of the mortise and mobilise the other. Use your thenar eminence (a broad, gentle contact) directly over the lateral or medial malleolus, lock your elbow, and transmit force through your body weight rather than your hand strength. The medial and lateral malleolus are frequently tender. Check in with your patient, slow down, or pad the contact with a towel if point pressure is poorly tolerated.[7]
Tibiofemoral Joint (Rotational)
Often overlooked in foot and ankle complaints, but a stiff tibiofemoral joint (post-surgical stiffness, osteoarthritis) can restrict distal internal rotation at the mortise.
Tibial internal rotation mobilisation technique: Grip the tibia directly (not the gastrocnemius-soleus complex) and rotate. If you feel yourself gripping soft tissue rather than bone, reset your hand position before applying force.[7]

Talocrural Joint — Anterior-to-Posterior Glide
Talus posterior glide technique: Stabilise the tibia/fibula, grip the foot just distal to the talus (metatarsals and navicular), and drive posteriorly through your body weight. Stabilising the lower leg matters clinically for two reasons: it protects the patient's leg from table edge discomfort, and it prevents unwanted knee motion from masking how much glide is actually occurring at the talocrural joint itself.[7]
Talocrural Joint — Posterior-to-Anterior Glide
If posterior glide is not producing the expected gain, this is your neurophysiological "other direction" option.[7]
Talus anterior glide technique: In supine, stabilise the tibia/fibula and lift the calcaneus anteriorly. In prone, drive the calcaneus toward the floor through the heel while padding the anterior tibia against the table edge.[7]
Progressing to Manipulation (Talocrural Joint)
Once graded mobilisation has restored enough range, a thrust technique can be considered.[15]
Manipulation is far less effective and can flare a patient up if adequate dorsiflexion range has not already been achieved through mobilisation first. Sequence matters: mobilise to create available range, then manipulate to lock it in.
Thrust manipulation technique: Bring the ankle into dorsiflexion and eversion, take up slack through traction, then apply a small scoop or "J"-shaped thrust rather than a straight pull (a straight pull tends to drift into plantar flexion instead of adding dorsiflexion).[7]
Mobilisation with Movement (Functional Loading)
Mobilisation with movement is performed in a weight-bearing position, with the foot on the floor or a step. However, the non-weight-bearing mobilisation is often more effective for larger restrictions because the joint surfaces have more space to move. Functional/weight-bearing techniques are best used as a progression once baseline mobility has improved.[16]
Talocrural joint and medial/lateral malleolus posterior glide with movement technique: Block the talus (or medial/lateral malleolus, depending on where the limitation lies) while the patient actively lunges forward and back, driving the mortise over a stabilised talus. This reintroduces the mobility gained in non-weight-bearing positions into a functional, gait-relevant pattern.[7]
A randomised controlled trial conducted by Georgoulas et al. demonstrates that incorporating posterior talar glide with movement yields significantly greater and more lasting gains in restricted ankle dorsiflexion. These improvements are evident in both open-chain goniometric assessments and functional weight-bearing conditions measured via the Weight-Bearing Lunge Test. [15]
Subtalar Joint — Lateral Glide
This is one of the most commonly under-assessed mobilisations because the talus is not adequately stabilised. If you do not firmly fix the talus first, you risk simply tilting the talus rather than gliding through the subtalar joint. What is worse, you may end up stretching an already-mobile structure while missing a true subtalar restriction.[7]
Subtalar joint lateral glide technique: Patient in supine, stabilise the talus firmly, contact the medial calcaneus with your thenar eminence, and glide/tilt laterally. Sidelying positioning lets you use body weight instead of hand strength for a more sustainable, higher-dose treatment.[7]
Differentiating Joint vs. Muscle Restriction
A hypertonic muscle can mimic a stiff joint, and a stiff joint can drive muscle guarding. [17]The two are neurophysiologically linked, not separate problems with separate causes.
To help differentiate the primary driver of a dorsiflexion restriction:
- Knee straight vs. knee bent dorsiflexion testing biases gastrocnemius (straight) vs. soleus/joint (bent).[18] If motion improves substantially with the knee bent, suspect gastrocnemius; if it remains limited with the knee bent, suspect soleus or the joint itself. You must check accessory joint motion to differentiate the two.
- Palpation for tautness/tenderness supports a muscular contribution.
- Toe extension testing differentiates between the intrinsic and extrinsic muscle involvement: dorsiflex the ankle first (loading extrinsic toe flexors), then test toe extension. Limitation here suggests an extrinsic muscular cause. If the limitation persists with the foot relaxed, suspect an intrinsic or joint-based cause instead.
Whatever your hypothesis, confirm it clinically: treat for one to three minutes, then retest. If the expected change occurs, your reasoning was likely correct. If it doesn't, recalibrate and consider the alternative structure.[7]
Resources
- bulleted list
References
- ↑ Smith RE, Lichtwark GA, Kelly LA. The energetic function of the human foot and its muscles during accelerations and decelerations. Journal of Experimental Biology. 2021 Jul 1;224(13):jeb242263.
- ↑ Shi X, Han J, Witchalls J, Waddington G, Adams R. Does treatment duration of manual therapy influence functional outcomes for individuals with chronic ankle instability: a systematic review with meta-analysis?. Musculoskeletal Science and Practice. 2019 Apr 1;40:87-95.
- ↑ 3.0 3.1 3.2 de Paula AL, de Castro Moreira B, Baião IC, da Costa Souza H, Corrêa CP, Felício DC, Fonseca DS. Effect of Manual Therapy Techniques on Ankle Dorsiflexion Range of Motion: A Systematic Review With Meta-Analysis and Grade Recommendations. Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics. 2025 Jan 1;48(1-5):577-86.
- ↑ Weerasekara I, Osmotherly P, Snodgrass S, Marquez J, de Zoete R, Rivett DA. Clinical benefits of joint mobilisation on ankle sprains: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation. 2018 Jul 1;99(7):1395-412.
- ↑ Tolsada-Velasco C, Hernández-Guillén D, Borja-de-Fuentes I, Costa-Moreno E, García-Gomáriz C, Blasco JM. Dose-response of talus mobilisations in weight-bearing ankle dorsiflexion ROM of older adults with limited ankle mobility: a randomised clinical trial. International Journal of Osteopathic Medicine. 2023 Dec 1;50:100670.
- ↑ Reid A, Birmingham TB, Alcock G. Efficacy of mobilisation with movement for patients with limited dorsiflexion after ankle sprain: a crossover trial. Physiotherapy Canada. 2007 Jul;59(3):166-72.
- ↑ 7.00 7.01 7.02 7.03 7.04 7.05 7.06 7.07 7.08 7.09 7.10 7.11 7.12 7.13 7.14 Kaplan A. Gait Loading Strategy and Foot and Ankle Mobilisation course. Plus 2026
- ↑ Cook G, Burton L, Hoogenboom BJ, Voight M. Functional movement screening: the use of fundamental movements as an assessment of function - part 1. Int J Sports Phys Ther. 2014 May;9(3):396-409.
- ↑ 9.0 9.1 Tourillon R, M'Baye M, Smith M. Restoring ankle dorsiflexion range of motion in athletes: an individualized clinical decision-making system. Frontiers in Sports and Active Living. 2025 Oct 22;7:1677383.
- ↑ Almansoof HS, Nuhmani S, Muaidi Q. Role of ankle dorsiflexion in sports performance and injury risk: A narrative review. Electronic Journal of General Medicine. 2023 Oct 1;20(5):1.
- ↑ Krause DA, Cloud BA, Forster LA, Schrank JA, Hollman JH. Measurement of ankle dorsiflexion: a comparison of active and passive techniques in multiple positions. J Sport Rehabil. 2011 Aug;20(3):333-44.
- ↑ McCann RS, Welch Bacon CE, Suttmiller AMB, Gribble PA, Cavallario JM. Assessments Used by Athletic Trainers to Decide Return-to-Activity Readiness in Patients With an Ankle Sprain. J Athl Train. 2024 Feb 1;59(2):182-200.
- ↑ Hegedus EJ, Goode A, Butler RJ, Slaven E. The neurophysiological effects of a single session of spinal joint mobilization: does the effect last? J Man Manip Ther. 2011 Aug;19(3):143-51.
- ↑ Shih YF, Yu HT, Chen WY, Liao KK, Lin HC, Yang YR. The effect of additional joint mobilization on neuromuscular performance in individuals with functional ankle instability. Physical Therapy in Sport. 2018 Mar 1;30:22-8.
- ↑ 15.0 15.1 Georgoulas V, Kallistratos I, Apostolou T, Kasimis K, Lytras D, Iakovidis P. Effects of Adding Posterior Ankle Joint Mobilization to Eccentric Training on Ankle Range of Motion and Athletic Performance in Basketball Athletes with Restricted Ankle Dorsiflexion: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Journal of Functional Morphology and Kinesiology. 2026 Feb 25;11(1):92.
- ↑ Gilbreath JP, Gaven SL, Van Lunen L, Hoch MC. The effects of mobilization with movement on dorsiflexion range of motion, dynamic balance, and self-reported function in individuals with chronic ankle instability. Man Ther. 2014 Apr;19(2):152-7.
- ↑ Yamazaki K, Sugibayashi T, Miyamoto N. Medial gastrocnemius stiffness contributes to active ankle joint stiffness and ground contact time in trained track-and-field athletes. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2026 Aug 6.
- ↑ Bryan Dixon J. Gastrocnemius vs. soleus strain: how to differentiate and deal with calf muscle injuries. Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med. 2009 Jun;2(2):74-7.













