Windlass Test

Welcome to Vrije Universiteit Brussel's Evidence-based Practice project. This space was created by and for the students in the Rehabilitation Sciences and Physiotherapy program of the Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium. Please do not edit unless you are involved in this project, but please come back in the near future to check out new information!!

Original Editor - Alesha Walker, Bilitis Crokaert

Lead Editors - Your name will be added here if you are a lead editor on this page.  Read more.

Search Strategy[edit | edit source]

add text here related to databases searched, keywords, and search timeline


Purpose of the test[edit | edit source]

Windlass-test

is a test to determine plantar fascia abnormalities is terms of over- and underpronation. Such information is important clinically because it may provide healthcare professionals with a clear understanding bout the relationship between abnormalities and biomechanical influences.. [1]

The test achieves a direct stretch which can be effective in the treatment for plantar fasciitis.( diGiovanni et al., 2003,2006; Ross, 2002) For a tight plantar fascia stretch beyond the end range of motion is usually suggested to regain his proper flexibility. (Dogerty,1985) The direct stretch onto plantar fascia by dorsiflexing the toes were more desired than Achilles tendon stretch alone in treating plantar fasciitis. DiGiovanni et al. (2003,2006) discovered that fascia stretch group demonstrated less pain and achieved higher activity level. [2]





Clinically Relevant Anatomy[edit | edit source]

The windlass mechanism occurs during terminal stance when the heel is off the ground.[3] The windlass effecting acting trough the MTP joints with particular contribution from the first MTP joint.

During the terminal stance, as the soleus and de gastrocnemius muscles contract actively to lift the heel of the ground, extension occurs at the metatarsophalangeal joints. The plantar fascial bands envelops  the convex surface of the metatarsal heads producing the windlass effect.

It accumulates the tension in the plantar fascia, raises the longitudinal arc and tends to resist the posterior and superior rotation of the calcaneus.[4]


Performance of the test[edit | edit source]

The difference between bearing weight and non-weight is that the sensibility is higher when the patient carries his weight.[5]

Non-weight bearing position: [6]

Passively raise the toes of the patient while he/se is sitting to see whether this causes pain.

1.     Patient’s knee is flexed to 90° while in non-bearing position

2.     Examiner stabilized the ankle and extends the MTP joint while allowing the IP to flex (preventing motion limitations due to short hallucis longus)

3.     Patient is standing on a step stool with toes over the stool’s edge.

4.     MTP joint is extended while allowing IP joint to flex

5.     Positive test if pain was provocated at the end range of the MTP extension


Weight-bearing position

With the patient in a weight bearing position, the examiner creates a great toe extension


[[Image:|84611-86143-308tn.jpg]]Twenty-two patients with plantar fasciitis, 23 patients with other types of foot pain, and 30 patients in a control group were evaluated with the Windlass test performed in a weightbearing and non-weightbearing position. In the non-weightbearing test, the first MP joint was maximally dorsiflexed with the ankle stabilized. The weightbearing test was performed with the toes hanging off the edge of a stool and dorsiflexion of the first MP was performed. Seven of the 22 patients in the plantar fasciitis group had a positive weight bearing Windlass test (31.8%), while only three had a positive test result in a non-weightbearing position (13.6%). None of the patients in the other foot pain group or control group had pain in the weightbearing and non-weightbearing position.[7]


Diagnostic [edit | edit source]

The plantar fascia strain increases with the increment of toe dorsiflexion angle and also with the increment of the Achilles tendon forces.

 Regression analysis of clinical data indicates that changing the toe angles caused more fascia strain change than the change in the Achilles tendon force (100N). The weighted influence of toe dorsiflexion angles and Achilles tendon force was 66,14% and 33,86% comparing to Carlon’s paper 84,5% and 15,5% respectively. These statistical results corresponded to the findings from DiGiovanni et al. (2003,2006) that a direct stretch by dorsiflexing the toes contributed more plantar tension than the Achilles tendon stretch alone.

<o:p></o:p>The valuate the effects of various combinations of toe dorsiflexion degree and Achilles tendon pulling force on plantar fascia response, the medial cuneiform and cuboids’ bones were fixed, and the at the top of the talus, only vertical movement was allowed. A total of 15 combinations were analyzed, with different toe dorsiflexion angles (15°, 30° and 45°) in combination with Achilles tension forces (100,200,300,400 and 500N).

<o:p></o:p>After tests and X-ray the results showed that the maximum stress was concentrated near the medial calcaneal tubercle.[2]

<o:p></o:p>Backstorm and More[8] also suggested stretching using a contract-relax-contract proprioreptive neuromuscular facilitation method.<o:p></o:p>




<o:p> </o:p>

Key Research[edit | edit source]

add links and reviews of high quality evidence here (case studies should be added on new pages using the case study template)

Resources
[edit | edit source]

Brown C. A review of subcalcaneal heel pain and plantar fasciitis. Aust Fam Physician. 1996;25:875–885.

De Garceau D, Dean D, Requejo SM, Thordarson DB. The association between diagnosis of plantar fasciitis and Windlass test results. Foot Ankle Int. 2003;24:251–255.

Clinical Bottom Line[edit | edit source]

add text here

Recent Related Research (from Pubmed)[edit | edit source]

Failed to load RSS feed from http://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/erss.cgi?rss_guid=1hm_zfT8jMJmIS4n9SaVoimNsNe93kco6bKSaSaxYd5kl63kKK|charset=UTF-8|short|max=10: Error parsing XML for RSS

References[edit | edit source]

References will automatically be added here, see adding references tutorial.

  1. 2.0 2.1 Hsin-YI Kathy Cheng, Chun-Li Lin, Hsein-Wen Wang, Shih-Wei Chou; Finite element analysis of plantar fascia under stretch- the relative contribution of windlass mechanism and achilles tendon force. Journal of Biomechanics 41 (2008) 1937-1944
  2. Hicks JH. The mechanics of the foot. The plantar aponeurosis and the Arch. J Anat 1954;88: 25-30fckLRSarrafian SK, Functional characteristics of the foot and plantar aponeurosis under tibio-talar loading. Foot Ankle 1987;8(1): 4-18
  3. Gary C Hunt, Tom Sneed, Herb Hamann, Sheldon Chisam: Biomechanical and histiological considerations for devolpment of the plantar fasciitis and evaluation of arch taping as a treatment option the control associated plantar heel pain: a single-subject design
  4. [i] Cole C, Seto C, Gazewood J,Plantar fasciitis: evidence-based review of diagnosis and therapy. Am Fam Physican. 2005;73(11);2237-2242,2247-2248.
  5. Michael Wong: Pocket Orthopaedics: Evidence-Based Survival Guide pg 361
  6. De Garceau D, Dean D, Requejo SM, Thordarson DB: The association between diagnosis of plantar fasciitis and Windlass test results. Foot Ankle Int. 2004 Sep;25(9):687
  7. Backstorm KM, More A. Plantar fasciitis ; Phys Ther Case REp, 2000 ; 3 : 154-162