Use of Modalities in Upper Limb Management in Tetraplegia: Difference between revisions

No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 67: Line 67:
# To improve cardiovascular fitness
# To improve cardiovascular fitness


The FES training can produce the following benefits:
The FES training can produce the following metabolic benefits:<ref>Martin R, Sadowsky C, Obst K, Meyer B, McDonald J. [https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3584753/pdf/sci-18-028.pdf Functional electrical stimulation in spinal cord injury:: from theory to practice]. Top Spinal Cord Inj Rehabil. 2012 Winter;18(1):28-33. </ref>


* It increases in lean muscle mass
* Increases in lean muscle mass  
* It increases in capillary number  
* Increases in capillary number
* It decreases in adipose tissue
* Decreases in adipose tissue
Other benefits include lowering the blood glucose and insulin levels, <ref>Jeon JY, Weiss CB, Steadward RD, Ryan E, Burnham RS, Bell G, Chilibeck P, Wheeler GD. [https://www.nature.com/articles/3101260 Improved glucose tolerance and insulin sensitivity after electrical stimulation-assisted cycling in people with spinal cord injury.] Spinal Cord. 2002 Mar;40(3):110-7.</ref>improvement in muscles size, strength, and composition, improved fatigue resistance and oxidative capacities, proportional increases in fiber area and capillary number. <ref>Chilibeck PD, Jeon J, Weiss C, Bell G, Burnham R. Histochemical changes in muscle of individuals with spinal cord injury following functional electrical stimulated exercise training. Spinal Cord. 1999 Apr;37(4):264-8. </ref>


FES can be used as a modality in the treatment of the upper limb in person with tetraplegia to:<ref name=":2">Kapadia N, Moineau B, Popovic MR. [https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7364342/pdf/fnins-14-00718.pdf Functional Electrical Stimulation Therapy for Retraining Reaching and Grasping After Spinal Cord Injury and Stroke]. Front Neurosci. 2020 Jul 9;14:718.</ref>
FES can be used as a modality in the treatment of the upper limb in person with tetraplegia to:<ref name=":2">Kapadia N, Moineau B, Popovic MR. [https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7364342/pdf/fnins-14-00718.pdf Functional Electrical Stimulation Therapy for Retraining Reaching and Grasping After Spinal Cord Injury and Stroke]. Front Neurosci. 2020 Jul 9;14:718.</ref>
Line 77: Line 78:
* Replace function (i.e., as an orthotic device)  
* Replace function (i.e., as an orthotic device)  
* Retrain function (i.e., as a therapeutic device)
* Retrain function (i.e., as a therapeutic device)
==== Replacing function ====


==== Retraining function ====
==== Retraining function ====
Line 83: Line 86:
* The patient is expected to regain voluntary function
* The patient is expected to regain voluntary function
* Kapadia et al.<ref name=":2" />described a protocol for transcutaneous FES to retrain reaching and grasping in individuals with spinal cord injury:<ref name=":2" />
* Kapadia et al.<ref name=":2" />described a protocol for transcutaneous FES to retrain reaching and grasping in individuals with spinal cord injury:<ref name=":2" />
** Upper extremity retraining program is designed based on the level and extent of injury  
** Upper extremity retraining program is designed based on the level and extent of injury
** The patient with upper tetraplegia will start with retraining proximal function followed by distal function training  
** The patient with upper tetraplegia will start with retraining proximal function followed by distal function training  
** The patient with lower tetraplegia will retrain distal function  from the beginning
** The patient with lower tetraplegia will retrain distal function  from the beginning
Line 91: Line 94:
** The following parameters are used:  balanced, biphasic, current regulated electrical pulse,  pulse amplitude from 8 to 50 mA , pulse width 250 μs; and pulse frequency 40 Hz  
** The following parameters are used:  balanced, biphasic, current regulated electrical pulse,  pulse amplitude from 8 to 50 mA , pulse width 250 μs; and pulse frequency 40 Hz  
** During the session, therapist guides the patient's hand to make the movement functional  
** During the session, therapist guides the patient's hand to make the movement functional  
** Typical FES session is conducted for 45–60 min,  3–5 days a week, for 8–16 weeks, for a total of about 40 sessionsFES delivers trains of electrical stimulation above motor threshold to stimulate a muscle or the efferent nerve supplying a muscle in order to attain a muscle contraction [14]. The higher the amplitude of this stimulation, the bigger is the number of recruited efferent fibers and, therefore, the higher the muscle contraction. In the case of SCI, it is well known that artificially induced contraction of weak or paralyzed muscles brings several therapeutic benefits, such as prevention of lower limb muscle atrophy, increased muscle strength, endurance, and cardiovascular fitness [38, 39]. In addition to these benefits, the coordinated stimulation of efferent nerves (usually to stimulate agonist-antagonist muscles of a joint) can be paired with a functional activity to produce a given biomechanical task and, thus, restore motor function.Finally, FES has also been used to reduce spasticity in SCI patients, usually by stimulating the spastic muscle. This is hypothesized to modulate recurrent inhibition via Renshaw cells [34]. These inhibitory interneurons are excited by collaterals of the axons of motoneurons and make inhibitory synaptic connections with several populations of motoneurons, including those that excite them [40]. This reciprocal inhibition is important to prevent overshooting muscle contraction induced by FES. Despite all the benefits here described, FES presents several challenges for tasks that are executed for long periods of time. Limited muscle force generation, rapid onset of muscle fatigue, and nonlinear, time-dependent mechanical responses, as well as the redundancy of the musculoskeletal system are the main challenges of this technology that traditionally hamper generalized use for rehabilitation and/or motor compensation of walking. However, multi-electrode techniques are showing promising results [41] and should be explored.<ref>Barroso FO, Pascual-Valdunciel A, Torricelli D, Moreno JC, Del-Ama AJ, Laczko J, Pons Rovira JL. Noninvasive modalities used in spinal cord injury rehabilitation. InTechOpen 2019. Available from https://docs.google.com/viewerng/viewer?url=https://digital.csic.es/bitstream/10261/213986/1/65272.pdf [last access 07.12.2022]</ref>
** Typical FES session is conducted for 45–60 min,  3–5 days a week, for 8–16 weeks, for a total of about 40 sessions


== Sub Heading 3 ==
== Sub Heading 3 ==

Revision as of 22:45, 8 December 2022

Original Editor - User Name

Top Contributors - Ewa Jaraczewska, Jess Bell and Tarina van der Stockt  

Introduction[edit | edit source]

A wide range of therapeutic modalities addressing upper limb function in patients with tetraplegia is available in spinal cord injury rehabilitation.

Vibration[edit | edit source]

Muscle vibration is a technique that has potential to reduce muscle tone and spasticity in individuals with neurological disorders. Direct effect of muscle vibrations include an increase in corticospinal excitability and inhibition of neuronal activity in the antagonistic muscle. The use of focal vibration as a modality in spinal cord injury facilitates a contraction of the agonist muscle. [1] Isometric contraction in triceps brachii were induced with the application of vibratory stimuli at 80 Hz on the muscle. [1]

Three motor effects achieved through muscle vibration are as follow:

  1. Sustained contraction of the vibrated muscle via tonic vibration reflex
  2. Depression of the motor neurones innervating the antagonistic muscles via reciprocal inhibition or antagonistic inhibition
  3. Suppression of the monosynaptic stretch reflexes of the vibrated muscle while being vibrated.

The sustained effect of vibration remains under investigation. According to Laessøe et al. [2], lower limb spasticity was reduced up to 3 hours following vibratory stimulation at 100 Hz.

Two different vibration frequencies can be chosen and applied directly to the muscle or tendon: high frequency and low frequency vibration.

High Frequency Vibration

  • Frequency of 100 - 200 Hz and
  • Amplitude of 1 – 2 mA.
  • Produce facilitation of muscle contraction through a tonic vibration reflex.
  • The effect is brief after application

Low Frequency Vibration

  • 5 -50 Hz
  • Inhibitory effect on muscle through its activation of spindle secondary endings and the Golgi tendon organs.


General Precautions

  • Heat generation at the point of application when high amplitude is used can cause skin damage
  • Stable health conditions (stable spine, no fractures)

Potential concerns related to use of vibration therapy

  • Increased the risk of thrombosis [3]
  • Tissue damage from acute or severe edema
  • Increased cardiac issue
  • Dislodgement of a thrombus [3]
  • Increased damage from peripheral vascular disease
  • Effects to spinal stimulators
  • Skin injury from friction[3]

You can read more about self-applied vibration here.

Surface Stimulation[edit | edit source]

Two the most commonly used forms of surface stimulation are:

  • Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation (TENS)
  • Functional Electrical Stimulation(FES).

TENS[edit | edit source]

This type of stimulation delivers high-frequency (50–150 Hz) and low-intensity (below motor threshold) surface electrical current decreased spasticity due to the use of this modality. For instance, TENS has recently reduced spasticity in SCI patients and the effects outlasted up to several hours after treatment [34]. This is because TENS activates sensory nerves that in turn may activate inhibitory interneurons that will inhibit the spastic muscle activity [34]. More specifically, these anti-spastic effects are due to the release of gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) that acts as inhibitory neurotransmitters, achieving similar anti-spastic effects to those of baclofen [32], which is a first-line treatment for spasticity, especially in adults who suffered a SCI [35]. Results of spasticity treatment using TENS seem to improve when combined with physical therapy [36]. Given its low cost, lack of adverse event effects, and ease to use, TENS seems to be a very good solution to treat spasticity after SCI. Moreover, since TENS alleviates pain and fatigue and can be used for periods of several hours, it seems to be appropriate for the beginning of the rehabilitation after SCI, when training is not very intensive.

FES[edit | edit source]

Goals:

  1. To prevent lower limb muscle atrophy,
  2. To increase muscle strength,
  3. To increase endurance
  4. To improve cardiovascular fitness

The FES training can produce the following metabolic benefits:[4]

  • Increases in lean muscle mass
  • Increases in capillary number
  • Decreases in adipose tissue

Other benefits include lowering the blood glucose and insulin levels, [5]improvement in muscles size, strength, and composition, improved fatigue resistance and oxidative capacities, proportional increases in fiber area and capillary number. [6]

FES can be used as a modality in the treatment of the upper limb in person with tetraplegia to:[7]

  • Replace function (i.e., as an orthotic device)
  • Retrain function (i.e., as a therapeutic device)

Replacing function[edit | edit source]

Retraining function[edit | edit source]

  • Short-term treatment modality
  • The patient is expected to regain voluntary function
  • Kapadia et al.[7]described a protocol for transcutaneous FES to retrain reaching and grasping in individuals with spinal cord injury:[7]
    • Upper extremity retraining program is designed based on the level and extent of injury
    • The patient with upper tetraplegia will start with retraining proximal function followed by distal function training
    • The patient with lower tetraplegia will retrain distal function from the beginning
    • The patient with little to no voluntary movement at the wrist and fingers can perform simple tasks while being stimulated with the FES
    • The number of repetitions is based on each of the participant’s strength and endurance
    • 30–45 min out of 1-h session patient performs activities of daily living with FES
    • The following parameters are used: balanced, biphasic, current regulated electrical pulse, pulse amplitude from 8 to 50 mA , pulse width 250 μs; and pulse frequency 40 Hz
    • During the session, therapist guides the patient's hand to make the movement functional
    • Typical FES session is conducted for 45–60 min, 3–5 days a week, for 8–16 weeks, for a total of about 40 sessions

Sub Heading 3[edit | edit source]

Resources[edit | edit source]

  • bulleted list
  • x

or

  1. numbered list
  2. x

References[edit | edit source]

  1. 1.0 1.1 Murillo N, Valls-Sole J, Vidal J, Opisso E, Medina J, Kumru H. Focal vibration in neurorehabilitation. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2014 Apr;50(2):231-42.
  2. Laessøe L, Nielsen JB, Biering-Sørensen F, Sønksen J. Antispastic effect of penile vibration in men with spinal cord lesion. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2004 Jun;85(6):919-24.
  3. 3.0 3.1 3.2 Poenaru D, Cinteza D, Petrusca I, Cioc L, Dumitrascu D. Local Application of Vibration in Motor Rehabilitation - Scientific and Practical Considerations. Maedica (Bucur). 2016 Sep;11(3):227-231.
  4. Martin R, Sadowsky C, Obst K, Meyer B, McDonald J. Functional electrical stimulation in spinal cord injury:: from theory to practice. Top Spinal Cord Inj Rehabil. 2012 Winter;18(1):28-33.
  5. Jeon JY, Weiss CB, Steadward RD, Ryan E, Burnham RS, Bell G, Chilibeck P, Wheeler GD. Improved glucose tolerance and insulin sensitivity after electrical stimulation-assisted cycling in people with spinal cord injury. Spinal Cord. 2002 Mar;40(3):110-7.
  6. Chilibeck PD, Jeon J, Weiss C, Bell G, Burnham R. Histochemical changes in muscle of individuals with spinal cord injury following functional electrical stimulated exercise training. Spinal Cord. 1999 Apr;37(4):264-8.
  7. 7.0 7.1 7.2 Kapadia N, Moineau B, Popovic MR. Functional Electrical Stimulation Therapy for Retraining Reaching and Grasping After Spinal Cord Injury and Stroke. Front Neurosci. 2020 Jul 9;14:718.