The Flag System: Difference between revisions

No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 8: Line 8:
[[Image:YellowFlag1.jpg|thumb|right]]  
[[Image:YellowFlag1.jpg|thumb|right]]  


Yellow flags are psychological (fear/avoidance beliefs, current coping methods and attribution) and social (work issues, family circumstances and benefits/economics) indicators suggesting increased risk of progression to long-term distress, disability and pain.  
Flags can be split into two distinct categories: clinical flags and psychosocial flags.  


The term was coined by&nbsp;Kendall and colleagues coined to encompass psychological risk factors and social and environmental risk factors for prolonged disability and failure to return to work as a consequence of musculoskeletal symptoms&nbsp;<ref name="Kendall">Kendall NA, Linton SJ, Main CJ. Guide to Assessing Psychosocial Yellow Flags in Acute Low Back Pain: Risk Factors for Long-Term Disability and Work Loss. Wellington, New Zealand: Accident Rehabilitation and Compensation Insurance Corporation of New Zealand and the National Health Committee; 1997.</ref>.<br>
'''Clinical flags''' are common to many areas of health – for example, red flags for musculoskeletal disorders, which are indicators of possible serious pathology such as inflammatory or neurological conditions, structural musculoskeletal damage or disorders, circulatory problems, suspected infections, tumours or systemic disease. If suspected, these require urgent further investigation and often surgical referral. There are certain signs and symptoms that when observed in a patient’s examination or history alert us to the fact that something could be seriously wrong. In the case of musculoskeletal disorders, physiotherapists are highly trained to identify or rule out red flags.&nbsp;If you suspect any red flags the patient must seek urgent medical attention and it is better to send the patient to A&amp;E rather than risk any permanent, life changing pathology.  


Key predictors include:
Recently, orange flags were added to the spectrum<ref name="Main2">Main CJ, Phillips CJ, Watson PJ. Secondary prevention in health-care and occupational settings in musculoskeletal conditions focusing on low back pain. In: Schultz IZ, Gatchel RJ, eds. Handbook of Complex Occupational Disability Claims: Early Risk Identification, Intervention and Prevention. New York, NY: Kluwer Academic/Plenum; 2005:387–404.</ref><ref name="Main3">Main CJ, Sullivan MJ, Watson PJ. Risk identification and screening. In: Main CJ, Sullivan MJ, Watson PJ, eds. Pain Management: Practical Applications of the Biopsychosocial Perspective in Clinical and Occupational Settings. Edinburgh, Scotland: Churchill Livingstone Elsevier; 2008:97–134.</ref><span style="line-height: 1.5em;">, and represent the equivalent of red flags for mental health and psychological problems – alerting the clinician to serious problems that could be psychiatric in nature, and therefore require referral to a specialis</span><span style="line-height: 1.5em;">t in that field, rather than following the normal course of management for mild mental health conditions such as anxiety</span><ref name="Main2" /><ref name="Main3" /><span style="line-height: 1.5em;">. Orange flags can include excessively high levels of distress, major personality disorders, post-traumatic stress disorders, drug and alcohol abuse/addictions or clinical depression.</span>


*The belief that pain is harmful or severely disabling
'''Psychosocial flags''' allow us to identify aspects of the person, their problem and their social context, and how those factors affect the recovery and return-to-work process. The concept was introduced in 1997 by Kendall et a<span style="line-height: 1.5em;">l</span><ref name="Kendall">Kendall NA, Linton SJ, Main CJ. Guide to Assessing Psychosocial Yellow Flags in Acute Low Back Pain: Risk Factors for Long-Term Disability and Work Loss. Wellington, New Zealand: Accident Rehabilitation and Compensation Insurance Corporation of New Zealand and the National Health Committee; 1997.</ref><span style="line-height: 1.5em;">&nbsp;and looked at factors that identified patients who were at risk of developing chronic disability, and did not recover as was expected for their condition.</span>
*Fear-avoidance behaviour (avoiding activity because of fear of pain)
*Low mood and social withdrawal
*Expectation that passive treatment rather than active participation will help


The system is important when considering [http://www.physio-pedia.com/Psychological_approaches_to_pain_management Psychological Aspects to Pain Management] and outcomes to treatment as a whole.
Psychosocial flags enable us to work from a biopsychosocial model and give a framework for assessment and planning. These flags are not a diagnosis or a symptom, but an indication that someone may not recover as expected, and may need additional support to return to work. These flags are often referred to as obstacles to recovery. Psychosocial factors determine outcomes such as activity levels and participation and work, but appear to be less relevant to the reporting of symptoms.  
 
== Assessing for yellow flags  ==
 
While performing a Yellow Flag assessment, the following should be acknowledged<ref name="Kendall" />:
 
*'''A'''ttitudes/Beliefs – What does the patient think to be the problem and do they have a positive or negative attitude to the pain and potential treatment?
*'''B'''ehaviour – Has the patient changed their behaviour to the pain? Have they reduced activity or compensating for certain movements. Early signs of catastrophising and fear-avoidance?
*'''C'''ompensation – Are they awaiting a claim due to a potential accident? Is this placing unnecessary stress on their life? .
*'''D'''iagnosis/Treatment – Has the language that has been used had an effect on patient thoughts? Have they had previous treatment for the pain before, and was there a conflicting diagnosis? This could cause the patient to over-think the issue, leading to catastrophising and fear-avoidance.
*'''E'''motions – Does the patient have any underlying emotional issues that could lead to an increased potential for chronic pain? Collect a thorough background on their psychological history.
*'''F'''amily – How are the patient’s family reacting to their injury? Are they being under-supportive or over-supportive, both of which can effect the patient’s concept of their pain
*'''W'''ork – Are they currently off work? Financial issues could potentially arise? What are the patient’s thoughts about their working environment?<br>
 
{{pdf|Assessing-yellow-flags.pdf|Clinical Assessment of Psychosocial Yellow Flags}}<br>
 
== The developing concept  ==
 
<span style="line-height: 1.5em;">However, more&nbsp;recent conceptualizations of yellow flags, it has been suggested that their range of applicability should be confined primarily to psychological risk factors to differentiate them from other risk factors, such as social and environmental variables</span><ref>Nicholas MK1, Linton SJ, Watson PJ, Main CJ; "Decade of the Flags" Working Group. [http://ptjournal.apta.org/content/91/5/737.long Early identification and management of psychological risk factors ("yellow flags") in patients with low back pain: a reappraisal].fckLRPhys Ther. 2011 May;91(5):737-53. doi: 10.2522/ptj.20100224. Epub 2011 Mar 30.</ref><span style="line-height: 1.5em;">.</span>
 
In recent years, the focus of research on yellow flags has been more specifically applied to occupational contexts. Main and Burton<ref>Main CJ, Burton AK. Economic and occupational influences on pain and disability. In: Main CJ, Spanswick CC, eds. Pain Management: An Interdisciplinary Approach. Edinburgh, Scotland: Churchill Livingstone; 2000:63–87</ref> have argued that, in these contexts, the term “yellow flags” should be reserved for more overtly psychological risk factors, such as fears and unhelpful beliefs, whereas the social/environmental (workplace) risk factors could be divided into 2 categories:
 
#Workers' perceptions that their workplace is stressful, unsupportive, and excessively demanding, which they termed “'''blue flags''',” and
#The more observable characteristics of the workplace and nature of the work, as well the insurance and compensation system under which workplace injuries are managed, which they termed “'''black flags'''.”
 
More recently, a distinction has been drawn between psychological risk factors that might be considered essentially “normal,” but unhelpful, psychological reactions to musculoskeletal symptoms (eg, the belief that pain necessarily implies damage) and clearly “abnormal” psychological or psychiatric factors or disorders (eg, posttraumatic stress disorder, major depression) suggestive of diagnosable psychopathology<ref name="Main2">Main CJ, Phillips CJ, Watson PJ. Secondary prevention in health-care and occupational settings in musculoskeletal conditions focusing on low back pain. In: Schultz IZ, Gatchel RJ, eds. Handbook of Complex Occupational Disability Claims: Early Risk Identification, Intervention and Prevention. New York, NY: Kluwer Academic/Plenum; 2005:387–404.</ref><ref name="Main3">Main CJ, Sullivan MJ, Watson PJ. Risk identification and screening. In: Main CJ, Sullivan MJ, Watson PJ, eds. Pain Management: Practical Applications of the Biopsychosocial Perspective in Clinical and Occupational Settings. Edinburgh, Scotland: Churchill Livingstone Elsevier; 2008:97–134.</ref>. It has been suggested that the normal but unhelpful psychological reactions should be described as yellow flags, and those meeting criteria for psychopathology should be termed “'''orange flags'''.”<ref name="Main2" /><ref name="Main3" />&nbsp;&nbsp;The primary significance of this distinction is to differentiate yellow flag factors, which might be amenable to change by suitably trained health care providers such as general medical practitioners and physical therapists, from orange flag factors that probably require specialist mental health referral.  
 
<br>


Below is a table with some examples of a flag colour, the nature of the flag and examples of clinical signs to look for on assessment<ref> Leerar,P. Boissonnault,W. Domholdt,E. Roddey,T. Documentation of Red Flags by Physical Therapists for Patients with Low Back Pain.J Man Manip Ther. 2007; 15(1): 42–49.</ref><span style="line-height: 1.5em;">:</span>  
Below is a table with some examples of a flag colour, the nature of the flag and examples of clinical signs to look for on assessment<ref> Leerar,P. Boissonnault,W. Domholdt,E. Roddey,T. Documentation of Red Flags by Physical Therapists for Patients with Low Back Pain.J Man Manip Ther. 2007; 15(1): 42–49.</ref><span style="line-height: 1.5em;">:</span>  
Line 64: Line 34:
| Clinical depression, personality disorder
| Clinical depression, personality disorder
|-
|-
| Yellow  
| rowspan="3" | Yellow  
| Beliefs, appraisals and judgements  
| Beliefs, appraisals and judgements  
| Unhelpful beliefs about pain: indication of injury as uncontrollable or likely to worsen.<br>Expectations of poor treatment outcome, delayed return to work.
| Unhelpful beliefs about pain: indication of injury as uncontrollable or likely to worsen.<br>Expectations of poor treatment outcome, delayed return to work.
|-
|-
| Yellow
| Emotional Responses  
| Emotional Responses  
| Distress not meeting criteria for diagnosis of mental disorder.<br>Worry, fears, anxiety.<br>
| Distress not meeting criteria for diagnosis of mental disorder.<br>Worry, fears, anxiety.<br>
|-
|-
| Yellow
| Pain behaviour (including pain and coping strategies)  
| Pain behaviour (including pain and coping strategies)  
| Avoidance of activities due to expectations of pain and possible reinjury.<br>Over-reliance on passive treatments.
| Avoidance of activities due to expectations of pain and possible reinjury.<br>Over-reliance on passive treatments.
Line 85: Line 53:
|}
|}


If you suspect any “'''RED FLAG'''” pathology there the patient must seek urgent medical attention and it is better to send the patient to A&amp;E rather than risk any permanent, life changing pathology.  
== Psychosocial flags<br>  ==
 
Psychosocial flags have been subdivided over the years to reflect the different interactions that can affect recovery. As a result, they are now referred to as yellow, blue and black flags<ref>Nicholas MK1, Linton SJ, Watson PJ, Main CJ; "Decade of the Flags" Working Group. [http://ptjournal.apta.org/content/91/5/737.long Early identification and management of psychological risk factors ("yellow flags") in patients with low back pain: a reappraisal].fckLRPhys Ther. 2011 May;91(5):737-53. doi: 10.2522/ptj.20100224. Epub 2011 Mar 30.</ref>. Briefly, yellow flags cover the features of the person which affect how they manage their situation with regard to thoughts, feelings and behaviours. Blue flags concern the workplace and the employee’s perceptions of health and work. And black flags are about the context and environment in which that person functions, which includes other people, systems and policies. Black flags can block or limit the helpful activity of healthcare providers and workplace support.
 
=== Yellow flags  ===
 
Obstacles that can be classed as yellow flags include many aspects of thoughts, feelings and behaviours. Some common examples include:<br>
 
*Catastrophising – thinking the worst
*Finding painful experiences unbearable, reporting extreme pain disproportionate to the condition
*Having unhelpful beliefs about pain and work – for instance, ‘if I go back to work my pain will get worse’
*Becoming preoccupied with health, over-anxious, distressed and low in mood
*Fear of movement and of re-injury
*Uncertainty about what the future holds
*Changes in behaviour or recurring behaviours
*Expecting other people or interventions to solve the problems (being passive in the process) and serial visits to various practitioners for help with no improvement.
 
==== Assessing for yellow flags  ====


== Treating yellow flags  ==
While performing a Yellow Flag assessment, the following should be acknowledged<ref name="Kendall" />:
 
**'''A'''ttitudes/Beliefs – What does the patient think to be the problem and do they have a positive or negative attitude to the pain and potential treatment?
**'''B'''ehaviour – Has the patient changed their behaviour to the pain? Have they reduced activity or compensating for certain movements. Early signs of catastrophising and fear-avoidance?
**'''C'''ompensation – Are they awaiting a claim due to a potential accident? Is this placing unnecessary stress on their life? .
**'''D'''iagnosis/Treatment – Has the language that has been used had an effect on patient thoughts? Have they had previous treatment for the pain before, and was there a conflicting diagnosis? This could cause the patient to over-think the issue, leading to catastrophising and fear-avoidance.
**'''E'''motions – Does the patient have any underlying emotional issues that could lead to an increased potential for chronic pain? Collect a thorough background on their psychological history.
**'''F'''amily – How are the patient’s family reacting to their injury? Are they being under-supportive or over-supportive, both of which can effect the patient’s concept of their pain
**'''W'''ork – Are they currently off work? Financial issues could potentially arise? What are the patient’s thoughts about their working environment?<br>
 
{{pdf|Assessing-yellow-flags.pdf|Clinical Assessment of Psychosocial Yellow Flags}}
 
==== Treating yellow flags  ====


The early treatment of patients at risk of developing chronic pain has been found to be effective at preventing long-term disability and chronicity.  
The early treatment of patients at risk of developing chronic pain has been found to be effective at preventing long-term disability and chronicity.  


=== Stepped care approach ===
'''Stepped care approach'''


People with pain require:  
People with pain require:  
Line 102: Line 99:
In addressing the factors above, the difference between treatment and rehabilitation becomes clearer but must still take into account the barriers to rehabilitation. These are the non-physical or clinical factors that are important to determine recovery and failure to address them can lead to a suboptimal outcome, no matter how technically good you are as a clinician<ref>Gordon Waddell and Paul J. Watson. Rehabilitation. Chapter 18 in: Waddell: The Back Pain Revolution. 2004 Churchill Livingstone</ref>.  
In addressing the factors above, the difference between treatment and rehabilitation becomes clearer but must still take into account the barriers to rehabilitation. These are the non-physical or clinical factors that are important to determine recovery and failure to address them can lead to a suboptimal outcome, no matter how technically good you are as a clinician<ref>Gordon Waddell and Paul J. Watson. Rehabilitation. Chapter 18 in: Waddell: The Back Pain Revolution. 2004 Churchill Livingstone</ref>.  


Von Korff and Moore<ref>Von Korff and Moore JC.  Stepped care for back pain: activating approaches for primary care. Ann Intern Med. 2001 May 1;134(9 Pt 2):911-7.</ref> advocate a stepped care approach, evident in the following table:  
Von Korff and Moore<ref>Von Korff and Moore JC.  Stepped care for back pain: activating approaches for primary care. Ann Intern Med. 2001 May 1;134(9 Pt 2):911-7.</ref>&nbsp;advocate a stepped care approach, evident in the following table:  


{| width="100%" border="1" cellpadding="1" cellspacing="1"
{| width="100%" border="1" cellpadding="1" cellspacing="1" style="font-size: 13px;"
|-
|-
| 1  
| 1  
Line 119: Line 116:
|}
|}


=== Cognitive behavioural approach  ===
'''Cognitive behavioural approach'''
 
[[Cognitive Behavioural Therapy]]&nbsp;(CBT) is a method that can help manage problems by changing the way patients would think and behave. It is not designed to remove any problems but help manage them in a positive manner&nbsp;<ref name="Beck 1995">Beck, J., 1995. Cognitive Therapy: Basics and Beyond. Guildford Press: New York</ref>&nbsp;<ref name="NHS Choices 2012">NHS Choices, 2012. Cognitive behavioural therapy. [online] Available at:http://www.nhs.uk/conditions/cognitive-behavioural-therapy/Pages/Introduction.aspx [Accessed 8th Jan 2014]</ref>.
 
It is not just psychologists or psychiatric nurses who specialise in CBT as some ESP physiotherapists, mainly in a MSK setting, have been trained in this specialist area so it is worth investigating who you could refer a patient to.
 
=== Blue flags  ===
 
Blue flags can be considered in terms of the employee and the workplace. The employee often has fears and misconceptions about work and health based on their own previous experiences or those of others in the company they work for, or stories from the neighbours. Blue flags can include:<br>
 
*Concerns about whether the person is able to meet the demands of the job
*Low job satisfaction
*Little or poor support at work
*A perception that the job is very stressful
*An accommodating approach in the workplace to providing altered duties or modified work options to facilitate a return to work
*Poor communication between employer and employee.
 
=== Black flags ===


[[Cognitive Behavioural Therapy]] (CBT) is a method that can help manage problems by changing the way patients would think and behave. It is not designed to remove any problems but help manage them in a positive manner <ref name="Beck 1995">Beck, J., 1995. Cognitive Therapy: Basics and Beyond. Guildford Press: New York</ref>&nbsp;<ref name="NHS Choices 2012">NHS Choices, 2012. Cognitive behavioural therapy. [online] Available at:http://www.nhs.uk/conditions/cognitive-behavioural-therapy/Pages/Introduction.aspx [Accessed 8th Jan 2014]</ref>.
There is some overlap between blue and black flags, but they can be primarily distinguished by the black flags being those that are outside the immediate control of the employee and/or the team trying to facilitate the return to work. Black flags include:<br>  


<br>
*Misunderstandings among those involved
*Financial issues and/or claims procedures
*Sensationalist media reports
*Family and friends with strong unhelpful beliefs influencing the employee
*Social isolation and becoming disconnected from the workforce


It is not just psychologists or psychiatric nurses who specialise in CBT as some ESP physiotherapists, mainly in a MSK setting, have been trained in this specialist area so it is worth investigating who you could refer a patient to.  
Poor or unhelpful company policies. Often company policies can take two forms: either there is no policy or inadequate policy surrounding sickness absence management and return to work, or there is rigid management of absence within a disciplinary policy system that does not allow sufficient flexibility to deal with genuine injury and illness rehabilitation needs.  


<br>


== Key Resources  ==
== Key Resources  ==
Line 142: Line 159:
&nbsp;<references />  
&nbsp;<references />  


[[Category:Pain]][[Category:Musculoskeletal/Orthopaedics|Orthopaedics]][[Category:Assessment]]
[[Category:Pain]] [[Category:Musculoskeletal/Orthopaedics|Orthopaedics]] [[Category:Assessment]]

Revision as of 12:17, 31 March 2014

Introduction[edit | edit source]

YellowFlag1.jpg

Flags can be split into two distinct categories: clinical flags and psychosocial flags.

Clinical flags are common to many areas of health – for example, red flags for musculoskeletal disorders, which are indicators of possible serious pathology such as inflammatory or neurological conditions, structural musculoskeletal damage or disorders, circulatory problems, suspected infections, tumours or systemic disease. If suspected, these require urgent further investigation and often surgical referral. There are certain signs and symptoms that when observed in a patient’s examination or history alert us to the fact that something could be seriously wrong. In the case of musculoskeletal disorders, physiotherapists are highly trained to identify or rule out red flags. If you suspect any red flags the patient must seek urgent medical attention and it is better to send the patient to A&E rather than risk any permanent, life changing pathology.

Recently, orange flags were added to the spectrum[1][2], and represent the equivalent of red flags for mental health and psychological problems – alerting the clinician to serious problems that could be psychiatric in nature, and therefore require referral to a specialist in that field, rather than following the normal course of management for mild mental health conditions such as anxiety[1][2]. Orange flags can include excessively high levels of distress, major personality disorders, post-traumatic stress disorders, drug and alcohol abuse/addictions or clinical depression.

Psychosocial flags allow us to identify aspects of the person, their problem and their social context, and how those factors affect the recovery and return-to-work process. The concept was introduced in 1997 by Kendall et al[3] and looked at factors that identified patients who were at risk of developing chronic disability, and did not recover as was expected for their condition.

Psychosocial flags enable us to work from a biopsychosocial model and give a framework for assessment and planning. These flags are not a diagnosis or a symptom, but an indication that someone may not recover as expected, and may need additional support to return to work. These flags are often referred to as obstacles to recovery. Psychosocial factors determine outcomes such as activity levels and participation and work, but appear to be less relevant to the reporting of symptoms.

Below is a table with some examples of a flag colour, the nature of the flag and examples of clinical signs to look for on assessment[4]:

Flag Nature Examples
Red Signs of serious pathology Cauda equina syndrome, fracture, tumour, unremitting night pain, sudden weight loss of 10pounds over 3 months, Bladder & Bowel incontinence
Orange Psychiatric symptoms Clinical depression, personality disorder
Yellow Beliefs, appraisals and judgements Unhelpful beliefs about pain: indication of injury as uncontrollable or likely to worsen.
Expectations of poor treatment outcome, delayed return to work.
Emotional Responses Distress not meeting criteria for diagnosis of mental disorder.
Worry, fears, anxiety.
Pain behaviour (including pain and coping strategies) Avoidance of activities due to expectations of pain and possible reinjury.
Over-reliance on passive treatments.
Blue Perceptions about the relationship between work and health Belief that work is too onerous and likely to cause further injury.
Belief that workplace supervisor and workmates are unsupportive.
Black System or contextual obstacles Legislation restricting options for return to work.
Conflict with insurance staff over injury claim.
Overly solicitous family and health care providers.
Heavy work, with little opportunity to modify duties.

Psychosocial flags
[edit | edit source]

Psychosocial flags have been subdivided over the years to reflect the different interactions that can affect recovery. As a result, they are now referred to as yellow, blue and black flags[5]. Briefly, yellow flags cover the features of the person which affect how they manage their situation with regard to thoughts, feelings and behaviours. Blue flags concern the workplace and the employee’s perceptions of health and work. And black flags are about the context and environment in which that person functions, which includes other people, systems and policies. Black flags can block or limit the helpful activity of healthcare providers and workplace support.

Yellow flags[edit | edit source]

Obstacles that can be classed as yellow flags include many aspects of thoughts, feelings and behaviours. Some common examples include:

  • Catastrophising – thinking the worst
  • Finding painful experiences unbearable, reporting extreme pain disproportionate to the condition
  • Having unhelpful beliefs about pain and work – for instance, ‘if I go back to work my pain will get worse’
  • Becoming preoccupied with health, over-anxious, distressed and low in mood
  • Fear of movement and of re-injury
  • Uncertainty about what the future holds
  • Changes in behaviour or recurring behaviours
  • Expecting other people or interventions to solve the problems (being passive in the process) and serial visits to various practitioners for help with no improvement.

Assessing for yellow flags[edit | edit source]

While performing a Yellow Flag assessment, the following should be acknowledged[3]:

    • Attitudes/Beliefs – What does the patient think to be the problem and do they have a positive or negative attitude to the pain and potential treatment?
    • Behaviour – Has the patient changed their behaviour to the pain? Have they reduced activity or compensating for certain movements. Early signs of catastrophising and fear-avoidance?
    • Compensation – Are they awaiting a claim due to a potential accident? Is this placing unnecessary stress on their life? .
    • Diagnosis/Treatment – Has the language that has been used had an effect on patient thoughts? Have they had previous treatment for the pain before, and was there a conflicting diagnosis? This could cause the patient to over-think the issue, leading to catastrophising and fear-avoidance.
    • Emotions – Does the patient have any underlying emotional issues that could lead to an increased potential for chronic pain? Collect a thorough background on their psychological history.
    • Family – How are the patient’s family reacting to their injury? Are they being under-supportive or over-supportive, both of which can effect the patient’s concept of their pain
    • Work – Are they currently off work? Financial issues could potentially arise? What are the patient’s thoughts about their working environment?

Clinical Assessment of Psychosocial Yellow Flags

Treating yellow flags[edit | edit source]

The early treatment of patients at risk of developing chronic pain has been found to be effective at preventing long-term disability and chronicity.

Stepped care approach

People with pain require:

  • a rationale for returning to activity
  • an appropriate strategy to manage their symptoms
  • a safe environment to engage in physical exercise to restore confidence in movement
  • the opportunity and encouragement to return to normal physical activity

In addressing the factors above, the difference between treatment and rehabilitation becomes clearer but must still take into account the barriers to rehabilitation. These are the non-physical or clinical factors that are important to determine recovery and failure to address them can lead to a suboptimal outcome, no matter how technically good you are as a clinician[6].

Von Korff and Moore[7] advocate a stepped care approach, evident in the following table:

1 Most patients who are at the acute stage Identify and address the common worries of patients with back pain using simple, symptomatic measures. Provide information and advice to encourage the resumption of ordinary activities.
2 The substantial minority of patients who do not resume ordinary activities by 3-6 weeks with simple advice. Provide brief, structured interventions that help patients to identify obstacles to recovery, set functional goals and develop plans to achieve them. Provide support for physical exercise and return to ordinary activities
3 The small minority of patients who have persisting disability in work or family life and who require more intensive intervention. Address dysfunctional beliefs and behaviour. Provide a progressive exercise or graded activity programme. Enable and support patients to return to ordinary activities.

Cognitive behavioural approach

Cognitive Behavioural Therapy (CBT) is a method that can help manage problems by changing the way patients would think and behave. It is not designed to remove any problems but help manage them in a positive manner [8] [9].

It is not just psychologists or psychiatric nurses who specialise in CBT as some ESP physiotherapists, mainly in a MSK setting, have been trained in this specialist area so it is worth investigating who you could refer a patient to.

Blue flags[edit | edit source]

Blue flags can be considered in terms of the employee and the workplace. The employee often has fears and misconceptions about work and health based on their own previous experiences or those of others in the company they work for, or stories from the neighbours. Blue flags can include:

  • Concerns about whether the person is able to meet the demands of the job
  • Low job satisfaction
  • Little or poor support at work
  • A perception that the job is very stressful
  • An accommodating approach in the workplace to providing altered duties or modified work options to facilitate a return to work
  • Poor communication between employer and employee.

Black flags[edit | edit source]

There is some overlap between blue and black flags, but they can be primarily distinguished by the black flags being those that are outside the immediate control of the employee and/or the team trying to facilitate the return to work. Black flags include:

  • Misunderstandings among those involved
  • Financial issues and/or claims procedures
  • Sensationalist media reports
  • Family and friends with strong unhelpful beliefs influencing the employee
  • Social isolation and becoming disconnected from the workforce

Poor or unhelpful company policies. Often company policies can take two forms: either there is no policy or inadequate policy surrounding sickness absence management and return to work, or there is rigid management of absence within a disciplinary policy system that does not allow sufficient flexibility to deal with genuine injury and illness rehabilitation needs.


Key Resources[edit | edit source]

  1. Kendall NA, Linton SJ, Main CJ. Guide to Assessing Psychosocial Yellow Flags in Acute Low Back Pain: Risk Factors for Long-Term Disability and Work Loss]. Wellington, New Zealand: Accident Rehabilitation and Compensation Insurance Corporation of New Zealand and the National Health Committee; 1997.
  2. Nicholas MK1, Linton SJ, Watson PJ, Main CJ; "Decade of the Flags" Working Group. Early identification and management of psychological risk factors ("yellow flags") in patients with low back pain: a reappraisal. Phys Ther. 2011 May;91(5):737-53. doi: 10.2522/ptj.20100224. Epub 2011 Mar 30.

Recent Related Research (from Pubmed)[edit | edit source]

Failed to load RSS feed from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/erss.cgi?rss_guid=1nq_IKqRo1llVnYIIPGbnRvZqENaXadrWD-KrqOcvO7U6PZkS9|charset=UTF-8|short|max=10: Error parsing XML for RSS

References[edit | edit source]

 

  1. 1.0 1.1 Main CJ, Phillips CJ, Watson PJ. Secondary prevention in health-care and occupational settings in musculoskeletal conditions focusing on low back pain. In: Schultz IZ, Gatchel RJ, eds. Handbook of Complex Occupational Disability Claims: Early Risk Identification, Intervention and Prevention. New York, NY: Kluwer Academic/Plenum; 2005:387–404.
  2. 2.0 2.1 Main CJ, Sullivan MJ, Watson PJ. Risk identification and screening. In: Main CJ, Sullivan MJ, Watson PJ, eds. Pain Management: Practical Applications of the Biopsychosocial Perspective in Clinical and Occupational Settings. Edinburgh, Scotland: Churchill Livingstone Elsevier; 2008:97–134.
  3. 3.0 3.1 Kendall NA, Linton SJ, Main CJ. Guide to Assessing Psychosocial Yellow Flags in Acute Low Back Pain: Risk Factors for Long-Term Disability and Work Loss. Wellington, New Zealand: Accident Rehabilitation and Compensation Insurance Corporation of New Zealand and the National Health Committee; 1997.
  4. Leerar,P. Boissonnault,W. Domholdt,E. Roddey,T. Documentation of Red Flags by Physical Therapists for Patients with Low Back Pain.J Man Manip Ther. 2007; 15(1): 42–49.
  5. Nicholas MK1, Linton SJ, Watson PJ, Main CJ; "Decade of the Flags" Working Group. Early identification and management of psychological risk factors ("yellow flags") in patients with low back pain: a reappraisal.fckLRPhys Ther. 2011 May;91(5):737-53. doi: 10.2522/ptj.20100224. Epub 2011 Mar 30.
  6. Gordon Waddell and Paul J. Watson. Rehabilitation. Chapter 18 in: Waddell: The Back Pain Revolution. 2004 Churchill Livingstone
  7. Von Korff and Moore JC. Stepped care for back pain: activating approaches for primary care. Ann Intern Med. 2001 May 1;134(9 Pt 2):911-7.
  8. Beck, J., 1995. Cognitive Therapy: Basics and Beyond. Guildford Press: New York
  9. NHS Choices, 2012. Cognitive behavioural therapy. [online] Available at:http://www.nhs.uk/conditions/cognitive-behavioural-therapy/Pages/Introduction.aspx [Accessed 8th Jan 2014]