Roland‐Morris Disability Questionnaire: Difference between revisions

No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 7: Line 7:


== Intended Population<br>  ==
== Intended Population<br>  ==
The Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire is most sensitive for patients with mild to moderate disability<ref>Davies, Claire C.1; Nitz, Arthur J.  [http://www.ingentaconnect.com/content/maney/ptr/2009/00000014/00000006/art00005 Psychometric properties of the Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire compared to the Oswestry Disability Index: a systematic review]. Physical Therapy Reviews, Volume 14, Number 6, December 2009 , pp. 399-408(10)</ref> <br>


== Method of Use  ==
== Method of Use  ==
Line 20: Line 22:
=== Responsiveness  ===
=== Responsiveness  ===


=== Miscellaneous<span style="font-size: 20px; font-weight: normal;" class="Apple-style-span"></span><br>  ===
=== Miscellaneous<span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: 20px; font-weight: normal;"></span><br>  ===


== Links  ==
== Links  ==

Revision as of 12:10, 22 February 2010

Original Editor - Your name will be added here if you created the original content for this page.

Lead Editors - Your name will be added here if you are a lead editor on this page.  Read more.

Objective
[edit | edit source]

Intended Population
[edit | edit source]

The Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire is most sensitive for patients with mild to moderate disability[1]

Method of Use[edit | edit source]

Reference
[edit | edit source]

Evidence[edit | edit source]

Reliability[edit | edit source]

Validity[edit | edit source]

Responsiveness[edit | edit source]

Miscellaneous
[edit | edit source]

Links[edit | edit source]

Recent Related Research (from Pubmed)[edit | edit source]

Extension:RSS -- Error: Not a valid URL: Feed goes here!!|charset=UTF-8|short|max=10

References[edit | edit source]

References will automatically be added here, see adding references tutorial.

  1. Davies, Claire C.1; Nitz, Arthur J. Psychometric properties of the Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire compared to the Oswestry Disability Index: a systematic review. Physical Therapy Reviews, Volume 14, Number 6, December 2009 , pp. 399-408(10)