Rent Test: Difference between revisions

No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
<div class="editorbox">
<div class="editorbox">
'''Original Editor '''- Your name will be added here if you created the original content for this page.
'''Original Editor '''- [[User:Ron Bucholtz|Ron Bucholtz]]


'''Lead Editors''' - Your name will be added here if you are a lead editor on this page.&nbsp; [[Physiopedia:Editors|Read more.]]  
'''Lead Editors''' - Your name will be added here if you are a lead editor on this page.&nbsp; [[Physiopedia:Editors|Read more.]]  
Line 10: Line 10:
== Technique  ==
== Technique  ==


Patient is seated with examiner standing behind patient.&nbsp; Have patient relax - palpate anterior&nbsp;margin of&nbsp;the acromion through the deltoid - while doing this grasp the patients arm with other hand at the elbow/forearm (patients elbow should be flexed to ~ 90 degrees) and bring into extension.&nbsp; Passively internally and externally rotate patients arm to palpate rotator cuff tendons.&nbsp; Presence of palpable or prominent eminence (Greater tuberosity) and/or rent (defect or 'sulcus')<ref>Dutton M.  Orthopaedic Examination, Evaluation, and Intervention.  New York:  The McGraw-Hill Comapinies  (2nd Ed.) 2008</ref> is indicative of full thickness tear. <sup><ref name="Wolf">Wolf EM &amp;amp;amp; Agrawal V.  Transdeltoid palpaiton (the rent test) in the diagnosis of rotator cuff tears.  J Shoulder Elbow Surg.  Sept/Oct 2001;10(5):470-473</ref><ref name="Lyons">Lyons AR &amp;amp;amp; Tomlinson JE.  Clincial Diagnosis of Tears of the Rotator Cuff.  J Bone Joint Surg.  May 1991;(74):404-405</ref><ref name="Cleland">Cleland J.  Orthopaedic Clinical Examination:  An Evidence Based Approach for Physical Therapists.  Philadelphia;  Saunders, Elsevier:  2007</ref></sup>  
Patient is seated with examiner standing behind patient.&nbsp; Have patient relax - palpate anterior&nbsp;margin of&nbsp;the acromion through the deltoid - while doing this grasp the patients arm with other hand at the elbow/forearm (patients elbow should be flexed to ~ 90 degrees) and bring into extension.&nbsp; Passively internally and externally rotate patients arm to palpate rotator cuff tendons.&nbsp; Presence of palpable or prominent eminence (Greater tuberosity) and/or rent (defect or 'sulcus')<ref>Dutton M.  Orthopaedic Examination, Evaluation, and Intervention.  New York:  The McGraw-Hill Comapinies  (2nd Ed.) 2008</ref> is indicative of full thickness tear. <sup><ref name="Wolf">Wolf EM &amp;amp;amp;amp; Agrawal V.  Transdeltoid palpaiton (the rent test) in the diagnosis of rotator cuff tears.  J Shoulder Elbow Surg.  Sept/Oct 2001;10(5):470-473</ref><ref name="Lyons">Lyons AR &amp;amp;amp;amp; Tomlinson JE.  Clincial Diagnosis of Tears of the Rotator Cuff.  J Bone Joint Surg.  May 1991;(74):404-405</ref><ref name="Cleland">Cleland J.  Orthopaedic Clinical Examination:  An Evidence Based Approach for Physical Therapists.  Philadelphia;  Saunders, Elsevier:  2007</ref></sup>  


== Evidence  ==
== Evidence  ==

Revision as of 15:02, 5 December 2009

Original Editor - Ron Bucholtz

Lead Editors - Your name will be added here if you are a lead editor on this page.  Read more.

Purpose[edit | edit source]

To test for the presence of rotator cuff tears 

Technique[edit | edit source]

Patient is seated with examiner standing behind patient.  Have patient relax - palpate anterior margin of the acromion through the deltoid - while doing this grasp the patients arm with other hand at the elbow/forearm (patients elbow should be flexed to ~ 90 degrees) and bring into extension.  Passively internally and externally rotate patients arm to palpate rotator cuff tendons.  Presence of palpable or prominent eminence (Greater tuberosity) and/or rent (defect or 'sulcus')[1] is indicative of full thickness tear. [2][3][4]

Evidence[edit | edit source]

Wolf and Agrawal[2] report Sensitivity and Specificity of 95.7% (.96[4]) and 96.8% (.97[4]) respectively with a positive predictive value of 95.7%, negative predictive value of 96.8% and a diagnostic accuracy of 96.3%.  Cleland[4] calculates a +LR of 32.0 and -LR of .04.  Lyons and Tomlinson[3] reported Sn of 91% (.91) and Sp of 75% (.75).

Resources (from Pubmed) [edit | edit source]

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11641706  [2]

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1587891  [3]

Recent Related Research (from Pubmed)[edit | edit source]

Failed to load RSS feed from http://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/erss.cgi?rss_guid=1tcbYKHhYJMWv9HbXJUJstjuxijJEr9d-nFqoGnO2eVQSxoE2q|charset=UTF-8|short|max=10: Error parsing XML for RSS

References[edit | edit source]

References will automatically be added here, see adding references tutorial.

  1. Dutton M. Orthopaedic Examination, Evaluation, and Intervention. New York: The McGraw-Hill Comapinies (2nd Ed.) 2008
  2. 2.0 2.1 2.2 Wolf EM &amp;amp;amp; Agrawal V. Transdeltoid palpaiton (the rent test) in the diagnosis of rotator cuff tears. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. Sept/Oct 2001;10(5):470-473
  3. 3.0 3.1 3.2 Lyons AR &amp;amp;amp; Tomlinson JE. Clincial Diagnosis of Tears of the Rotator Cuff. J Bone Joint Surg. May 1991;(74):404-405
  4. 4.0 4.1 4.2 4.3 Cleland J. Orthopaedic Clinical Examination: An Evidence Based Approach for Physical Therapists. Philadelphia; Saunders, Elsevier: 2007