Prone Instability Test: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
'''Lead Editors''' - Your name will be added here if you are a lead editor on this page. [[Physiopedia:Editors|Read more.]] | '''Lead Editors''' - Your name will be added here if you are a lead editor on this page. [[Physiopedia:Editors|Read more.]] | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
== Purpose<sup>2</sup><br> == | == Purpose<sup>2</sup><br> == | ||
| Line 68: | Line 59: | ||
[http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18722203?ordinalpos=7&itool=EntrezSystem2.PEntrez.Pubmed.Pubmed_ResultsPanel.Pubmed_DefaultReportPanel.Pubmed_RVDocSum Spinal palpation for lumbar segmental mobility and pain provocation: an interexaminer reliability study.]<br> | [http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18722203?ordinalpos=7&itool=EntrezSystem2.PEntrez.Pubmed.Pubmed_ResultsPanel.Pubmed_DefaultReportPanel.Pubmed_RVDocSum Spinal palpation for lumbar segmental mobility and pain provocation: an interexaminer reliability study.]<br> | ||
< | <div class="researchbox"> | ||
== Recent Related Research (from [http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/ Pubmed]) == | |||
<rss>http://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/erss.cgi?rss_guid=1rA3jDUv55FvQVFQ_Lz7hOir8StOUX4JlQ3__XP-P3C7nO3Qt|charset=UTF-8|short|max=10</rss> | |||
</div> | |||
== References == | |||
References will automatically be added here, see [[Adding References|adding references tutorial]]. | |||
<references /> | |||
1. Dutton, M. Orthopaedic Examination, Evaluation, and Intervention. New York: The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.; 2008.<br> | 1. Dutton, M. Orthopaedic Examination, Evaluation, and Intervention. New York: The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.; 2008.<br> | ||
| Line 76: | Line 74: | ||
2. Flynn T, Cleland J, Whitman J. User's Guide to the Musculoskeletal Examination: Fundamentals for the Evidence-based Clinician. Buckner, Kentucky: Evidence in Motion; 2008.<br> | 2. Flynn T, Cleland J, Whitman J. User's Guide to the Musculoskeletal Examination: Fundamentals for the Evidence-based Clinician. Buckner, Kentucky: Evidence in Motion; 2008.<br> | ||
3. Hicks G, FritzJ, Delitto A, McGill S. Preliminary development of a clinical prediction rule for determining which patients with low back pain will respond to a stabilization exercise program. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2005;86:1753-1762. | 3. Hicks G, FritzJ, Delitto A, McGill S. Preliminary development of a clinical prediction rule for determining which patients with low back pain will respond to a stabilization exercise program. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2005;86:1753-1762. | ||
[[Category:Articles]] [[Category:Assessment]] [[Category:Lumbo-Pelvic]] [[Category:Musculoskeletal/Orthopaedics]] [[Category: | [[Category:Articles]] [[Category:Assessment]] [[Category:Lumbo-Pelvic]] [[Category:Musculoskeletal/Orthopaedics]] [[Category:Special_Tests]] [[Category:Videos]] | ||
Revision as of 21:48, 4 June 2009
Original Editor - Your name will be added here if you created the original content for this page.
Lead Editors - Your name will be added here if you are a lead editor on this page. Read more.
Purpose2
[edit | edit source]
To test for the likelihood of a patient with low back pain responding to a stabilization exercise program.
Technique1,2
[edit | edit source]
The patient lies prone with the body on the examining table and legs over the edge and feet resting on the floor. While the patient rests in this position with the trunk muscles relaxed, the examiner applies posterior to anterior pressure to an individual spinous process of the lumbar spine. Any provocation of pain is reported. Then the patient lifts the legs off the floor (the patient may hold table to maintain position) and posterior to anterior compression is applied again to the lumbar spine while the trunk musculature is contracted.
The test is considered positive if pain is present in the resting position but subsides in the second position, suggesting lumbo-pelvic instability. The muscle activation is capable of stabilizing the spinal segment.
Evidence3[edit | edit source]
Reference standard success with stabilization exercise program.
Sensitivity = .72 - LR = .48
Specificity = .58 + LR = 1.7
Resources[edit | edit source]
Recent Related Research (from Pubmed)[edit | edit source]
Failed to load RSS feed from http://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/erss.cgi?rss_guid=1rA3jDUv55FvQVFQ_Lz7hOir8StOUX4JlQ3__XP-P3C7nO3Qt|charset=UTF-8|short|max=10: Error parsing XML for RSS
References[edit | edit source]
References will automatically be added here, see adding references tutorial.
1. Dutton, M. Orthopaedic Examination, Evaluation, and Intervention. New York: The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.; 2008.
2. Flynn T, Cleland J, Whitman J. User's Guide to the Musculoskeletal Examination: Fundamentals for the Evidence-based Clinician. Buckner, Kentucky: Evidence in Motion; 2008.
3. Hicks G, FritzJ, Delitto A, McGill S. Preliminary development of a clinical prediction rule for determining which patients with low back pain will respond to a stabilization exercise program. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2005;86:1753-1762.
