Oswestry Disability Index: Difference between revisions

No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 12: Line 12:
== Intended Population<br>  ==
== Intended Population<br>  ==


Acute or chronic low back pain.&nbsp; Most effective for persistent severe disability while the Roland Moris is better for mild to moderate disability<ref>Davies, Claire C.1; Nitz, Arthur J.  [http://www.ingentaconnect.com/content/maney/ptr/2009/00000014/00000006/art00005 Psychometric properties of the Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire compared to the Oswestry Disability Index: a systematic review]. Physical Therapy Reviews, Volume 14, Number 6, December 2009 , pp. 399-408(10)</ref>
Acute or chronic low back pain.&nbsp; Most effective for persistent severe disability while the [[Roland‐Morris_Disability_Questionna|Roland-Morris]] is better for mild to moderate disability<ref>Davies, Claire C.1; Nitz, Arthur J.  [http://www.ingentaconnect.com/content/maney/ptr/2009/00000014/00000006/art00005 Psychometric properties of the Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire compared to the Oswestry Disability Index: a systematic review]. Physical Therapy Reviews, Volume 14, Number 6, December 2009 , pp. 399-408(10)</ref>


== Method of Use  ==
== Method of Use  ==

Revision as of 13:21, 22 February 2010

Original Editor - Rachael Lowe

Lead Editors - Your name will be added here if you are a lead editor on this page.  Read more.

Objective
[edit | edit source]

Patient-completed questionnaire which gives a subjective percentage score of level of function (disability) in activities of daily living in those rehabilitating from low back pain.

Link to Document

Intended Population
[edit | edit source]

Acute or chronic low back pain.  Most effective for persistent severe disability while the Roland-Morris is better for mild to moderate disability[1]

Method of Use[edit | edit source]

Questionnaire examines perceived level of disability in 10 everyday activities of daily living.

The 6 statements are scored from 0 to 5 with the first statement scoring 0 through to the last at 5, e.g.,
Section 1 - Pain intensity
• I have no pain at the moment. Score = 0
• The pain is very mild at the moment. Score = 1
• The pain is moderate at the moment. Score = 2
• The pain is fairly severe at the moment. Score = 3
• The pain is very severe at the moment. Score = 4
• The pain is the worst imaginable at the moment. Score = 5

If more than one box is marked in each section, take the highest score.

The ODI score (index) is calculated as:

For example:

If all 10 sections are completed the score is calculated as follows:

if 16 (total scored) out of 50 (total possible score) x 100 = 32%

If one section is missed (or not applicable) the score is calculated:

If 16 (total scored) / 45 (total possible score) x 100 = 35.5%

Rounding the percentage to a whole number for convenience is suggested.

Reference
[edit | edit source]

Fairbank J, Couper J, Davies J, O'Brian J. The Oswestry low backpain questionnaire, Physiotherapy 1980;66:271-3. (Version 1.0)[2]

Fairbank J, Pynsent P. The Oswestry disablility index. Spine 2000;25:2490-53. (Version 2.0)[3]

Roland M, Fairbank J. The Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire and the Oswestry Disability Questionnaire. Spine 2000;25:3115-3124 (Version 2.1)[4]

Evidence[edit | edit source]

Reliability[edit | edit source]

The ODI addresses a broader concept of disability than that directly related to pain intensity[5].

Validity[edit | edit source]

Fisher K, Johnston M (1997) Validation of the ODQ, its sensitivity as a measure of change following treatment and its relationship with other aspects of the chronic pain experience Physiotherapy Theory and Practice 13, 67-80

Responsiveness[edit | edit source]

Bolton JE, Fish RG (1997) Responsiveness of the Revised Oswestry Disability Questionnaire Eur J Chiropractic 45, 1, 9-14

Miscellaneous
[edit | edit source]

Resources
[edit | edit source]

Baker D, Pynsent PB, Fairbank JCT (1989) The Oswestry disability index revisited: its reliability, repeatability, and validity, and a comparison with St Thomas Disability Index. In Roland MO, Jenner JR eds (1989) Back Pain: new approaches to rehabilitation and education. New York, NY. Manchester University Press 174-186

The Oswestry Disability Index website

Recent Related Research (from Pubmed)[edit | edit source]

Failed to load RSS feed from http://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/erss.cgi?rss_guid=1JIsr3YNQVWUuN9J71GLUGPhWciGG1xwUe9sRFlUtFPW7A_wdT|charset=UTF-8|short|max=10: Error parsing XML for RSS

References[edit | edit source]

References will automatically be added here, see adding references tutorial.

  1. Davies, Claire C.1; Nitz, Arthur J. Psychometric properties of the Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire compared to the Oswestry Disability Index: a systematic review. Physical Therapy Reviews, Volume 14, Number 6, December 2009 , pp. 399-408(10)
  2. Fairbank J, Davies J, Couper J, OBrien J (1980) The Oswestry low back pain disability questionnaire Physiotherapy 66, 8, 271-273
  3. Fairbank J, Pynsent P. The Oswestry disablility index. Spine 2000;25:2490-53.
  4. Roland M, Fairbank J. The Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire and the Oswestry Disability Questionnaire. Spine 2000;25:3115-3124
  5. Gronblad M, Hupli M et al (1989) Intercorrelation and test-retest reliability of the pain disability index and the Oswestry disability questionnaire and their correlation with pain intensity in low back pain patients The Clinical Journal of Pain 9, 189-195.