Oswestry Disability Index: Difference between revisions
Rachael Lowe (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Rachael Lowe (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
<div class="editorbox"> | <div class="editorbox"> | ||
'''Original Editor '''- | '''Original Editor '''- [[User:Rachael Lowe|Rachael Lowe]] | ||
'''Lead Editors''' - Your name will be added here if you are a lead editor on this page. [[Physiopedia:Editors|Read more.]] | '''Lead Editors''' - Your name will be added here if you are a lead editor on this page. [[Physiopedia:Editors|Read more.]] | ||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
Patient-completed questionnaire which gives a subjective percentage score of level of function (disability) in activities of daily living in those rehabilitating from low back pain. <br> | Patient-completed questionnaire which gives a subjective percentage score of level of function (disability) in activities of daily living in those rehabilitating from low back pain. <br> | ||
[http://www.orthosurg.org.uk/odi/odi_version_2.htm Link to Document] | [http://www.orthosurg.org.uk/odi/odi_version_2.htm Link to Document] | ||
== Intended Population<br> == | == Intended Population<br> == | ||
| Line 42: | Line 42: | ||
Fairbank J, Pynsent P. The Oswestry disablility index. Spine 2000;25:2490-53. ('''Version 2.0''')<ref>Fairbank J, Pynsent P. The Oswestry disablility index. Spine 2000;25:2490-53.</ref> | Fairbank J, Pynsent P. The Oswestry disablility index. Spine 2000;25:2490-53. ('''Version 2.0''')<ref>Fairbank J, Pynsent P. The Oswestry disablility index. Spine 2000;25:2490-53.</ref> | ||
Roland M, Fairbank J. The Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire and the Oswestry Disability Questionnaire. Spine 2000;25:3115-3124 ('''Version 2.1''')<ref>Roland M, Fairbank J. The Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire and the Oswestry Disability Questionnaire. Spine 2000;25:3115-3124</ref> | Roland M, Fairbank J. The Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire and the Oswestry Disability Questionnaire. Spine 2000;25:3115-3124 ('''Version 2.1''')<ref>Roland M, Fairbank J. The Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire and the Oswestry Disability Questionnaire. Spine 2000;25:3115-3124</ref> | ||
== Evidence == | == Evidence == | ||
| Line 58: | Line 58: | ||
Bolton JE, Fish RG (1997) Responsiveness of the Revised Oswestry Disability Questionnaire Eur J Chiropractic 45, 1, 9-14<br> | Bolton JE, Fish RG (1997) Responsiveness of the Revised Oswestry Disability Questionnaire Eur J Chiropractic 45, 1, 9-14<br> | ||
=== Miscellaneous<span | === Miscellaneous<span style="font-size: 20px; font-weight: normal;" class="Apple-style-span"></span><br> === | ||
== Resources<br> == | == Resources<br> == | ||
| Line 64: | Line 64: | ||
Baker D, Pynsent PB, Fairbank JCT (1989) The Oswestry disability index revisited: its reliability, repeatability, and validity, and a comparison with St Thomas Disability Index. In Roland MO, Jenner JR eds (1989) Back Pain: new approaches to rehabilitation and education. New York, NY. Manchester University Press 174-186<br> | Baker D, Pynsent PB, Fairbank JCT (1989) The Oswestry disability index revisited: its reliability, repeatability, and validity, and a comparison with St Thomas Disability Index. In Roland MO, Jenner JR eds (1989) Back Pain: new approaches to rehabilitation and education. New York, NY. Manchester University Press 174-186<br> | ||
[http://www.orthosurg.org.uk/odi/ The Oswestry Disability Index website]<br> | [http://www.orthosurg.org.uk/odi/ The Oswestry Disability Index website]<br> | ||
== Recent Related Research (from [http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/ Pubmed]) == | == Recent Related Research (from [http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/ Pubmed]) == | ||
Revision as of 13:19, 22 February 2010
Original Editor - Rachael Lowe
Lead Editors - Your name will be added here if you are a lead editor on this page. Read more.
Objective
[edit | edit source]
Patient-completed questionnaire which gives a subjective percentage score of level of function (disability) in activities of daily living in those rehabilitating from low back pain.
Intended Population
[edit | edit source]
Acute or chronic low back pain. Most effective for persistent severe disability[1]
Method of Use[edit | edit source]
Questionnaire examines perceived level of disability in 10 everyday activities of daily living.
The 6 statements are scored from 0 to 5 with the first statement scoring 0 through to the last at 5, e.g.,
Section 1 - Pain intensity
• I have no pain at the moment. Score = 0
• The pain is very mild at the moment. Score = 1
• The pain is moderate at the moment. Score = 2
• The pain is fairly severe at the moment. Score = 3
• The pain is very severe at the moment. Score = 4
• The pain is the worst imaginable at the moment. Score = 5
If more than one box is marked in each section, take the highest score.
The ODI score (index) is calculated as:
For example:
If all 10 sections are completed the score is calculated as follows:
if 16 (total scored) out of 50 (total possible score) x 100 = 32%
If one section is missed (or not applicable) the score is calculated:
If 16 (total scored) / 45 (total possible score) x 100 = 35.5%
Rounding the percentage to a whole number for convenience is suggested.
Reference
[edit | edit source]
Fairbank J, Couper J, Davies J, O'Brian J. The Oswestry low backpain questionnaire, Physiotherapy 1980;66:271-3. (Version 1.0)[2]
Fairbank J, Pynsent P. The Oswestry disablility index. Spine 2000;25:2490-53. (Version 2.0)[3]
Roland M, Fairbank J. The Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire and the Oswestry Disability Questionnaire. Spine 2000;25:3115-3124 (Version 2.1)[4]
Evidence[edit | edit source]
Reliability[edit | edit source]
The ODI addresses a broader concept of disability than that directly related to pain intensity[5].
Validity[edit | edit source]
Fisher K, Johnston M (1997) Validation of the ODQ, its sensitivity as a measure of change following treatment and its relationship with other aspects of the chronic pain experience Physiotherapy Theory and Practice 13, 67-80
Responsiveness[edit | edit source]
Bolton JE, Fish RG (1997) Responsiveness of the Revised Oswestry Disability Questionnaire Eur J Chiropractic 45, 1, 9-14
Miscellaneous
[edit | edit source]
Resources
[edit | edit source]
Baker D, Pynsent PB, Fairbank JCT (1989) The Oswestry disability index revisited: its reliability, repeatability, and validity, and a comparison with St Thomas Disability Index. In Roland MO, Jenner JR eds (1989) Back Pain: new approaches to rehabilitation and education. New York, NY. Manchester University Press 174-186
The Oswestry Disability Index website
Recent Related Research (from Pubmed)[edit | edit source]
Failed to load RSS feed from http://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/erss.cgi?rss_guid=1JIsr3YNQVWUuN9J71GLUGPhWciGG1xwUe9sRFlUtFPW7A_wdT|charset=UTF-8|short|max=10: Error parsing XML for RSS
References[edit | edit source]
References will automatically be added here, see adding references tutorial.
- ↑ Davies, Claire C.1; Nitz, Arthur J. Psychometric properties of the Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire compared to the Oswestry Disability Index: a systematic review. Physical Therapy Reviews, Volume 14, Number 6, December 2009 , pp. 399-408(10)
- ↑ Fairbank J, Davies J, Couper J, OBrien J (1980) The Oswestry low back pain disability questionnaire Physiotherapy 66, 8, 271-273
- ↑ Fairbank J, Pynsent P. The Oswestry disablility index. Spine 2000;25:2490-53.
- ↑ Roland M, Fairbank J. The Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire and the Oswestry Disability Questionnaire. Spine 2000;25:3115-3124
- ↑ Gronblad M, Hupli M et al (1989) Intercorrelation and test-retest reliability of the pain disability index and the Oswestry disability questionnaire and their correlation with pain intensity in low back pain patients The Clinical Journal of Pain 9, 189-195.
