Neck Disability Index: Difference between revisions
Rachael Lowe (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Rachael Lowe (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
== Summary<br> == | == Summary<br> == | ||
Patient-completed, condition-specific functional status questionnaire, based on the Oswestry low back pain questionnaire. 10 items including pain, personal care, lifting, reading, headaches, concentration, work, driving, sleeping and recreation. Each item is rated on a 6-point scale with scores varying between 0 and 50. The NDI has sufficient support and usefulness to retain its current status as the most commonly used self-report measure for neck pain<ref name="Macdermid et al">Macdermid JC, Walton DM, Avery S, Blanchard A, Etruw E, McAlpine C, Goldsmith CH. Journal of Orthopedic and Sports Physical Therapy. 2009 May;39(5):400-17.</ref>.<br> | The NDI is a modification of the Oswestry Low Back Pain Disability Index. Patient-completed, condition-specific functional status questionnaire, based on the Oswestry low back pain questionnaire. 10 items including pain, personal care, lifting, reading, headaches, concentration, work, driving, sleeping and recreation. Each item is rated on a 6-point scale with scores varying between 0 and 50. The NDI has sufficient support and usefulness to retain its current status as the most commonly used self-report measure for neck pain<ref name="Macdermid et al">Macdermid JC, Walton DM, Avery S, Blanchard A, Etruw E, McAlpine C, Goldsmith CH. Journal of Orthopedic and Sports Physical Therapy. 2009 May;39(5):400-17.</ref>.<br> | ||
<br> | |||
The NDI can be scored as raw score (Vernon, 1991) or doubled, and expressed as a percent (Riddle,<br>1998). Each section is scored on a 0-5 scale, with the first statement being “0” (ie. No<br>pain) and the last statement being “5” (ie. Worst imaginable pain). A higher score<br>indicates more patient-rated disability. There is no statement in the original literature on<br>how to handle missing data. To use the NDI for patient decisions, a clinically important<br>change was calculated as 5 points, with a sensitivity of 0.78 and a specificity of 0.80<br>(Stratford, 1999).<br> | |||
== Intended Population<br> == | == Intended Population<br> == | ||
Revision as of 14:13, 18 June 2009
Original Editor - Rachael Lowe
Lead Editors - Your name will be added here if you are a lead editor on this page. Read more.
Summary
[edit | edit source]
The NDI is a modification of the Oswestry Low Back Pain Disability Index. Patient-completed, condition-specific functional status questionnaire, based on the Oswestry low back pain questionnaire. 10 items including pain, personal care, lifting, reading, headaches, concentration, work, driving, sleeping and recreation. Each item is rated on a 6-point scale with scores varying between 0 and 50. The NDI has sufficient support and usefulness to retain its current status as the most commonly used self-report measure for neck pain[1].
The NDI can be scored as raw score (Vernon, 1991) or doubled, and expressed as a percent (Riddle,
1998). Each section is scored on a 0-5 scale, with the first statement being “0” (ie. No
pain) and the last statement being “5” (ie. Worst imaginable pain). A higher score
indicates more patient-rated disability. There is no statement in the original literature on
how to handle missing data. To use the NDI for patient decisions, a clinically important
change was calculated as 5 points, with a sensitivity of 0.78 and a specificity of 0.80
(Stratford, 1999).
Intended Population
[edit | edit source]
Chronic neck pain, musculoskeletal neck pain and whiplash injuries.
Reference
[edit | edit source]
Vernon H, Mior S. (1991) The neck disability index: A study of reliability and validity. Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics 14, 409-15[2]
Evidence[edit | edit source]
Reliability[edit | edit source]
Vernon H, Mior S. (1991) The neck disability index: A study of reliability and validity. Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics 14, 409-15[2]
Validity[edit | edit source]
Mark Chan Ci En, Dean A. Clair and Stephen J. Edmondston. Manual Therapy, 2009, 14(4):433-438[3]
Responsiveness[edit | edit source]
Riddle DL, Stratford PW. Use of generic versus region specific functional status measures on patients with cervical spine disorders. Physical Therapy, 1998;78:951-963[4]
Miscellaneous[edit | edit source]
Stratford PW, Riddle DL, Binkley JM et al (1999) Using the neck disability index to make decisions concerning individual patients Physiotherapy Canada, 2,107-112[5].
Jette DU, Jette AM (1996) Physical therapy and health outcomes in patients with spinal impairments. Physical Therapy 76, 930-45[6]
Recent Related Research (from Pubmed)[edit | edit source]
Failed to load RSS feed from http://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/erss.cgi?rss_guid=1NwSQ1kPYoZ1BHXGyok_x3pfuZCMJvIb52XKsd8pCQejfeXAV|charset=UTF-8|short|max=10: Error parsing XML for RSSReferences[edit | edit source]
References will automatically be added here, see adding references tutorial.
- ↑ Macdermid JC, Walton DM, Avery S, Blanchard A, Etruw E, McAlpine C, Goldsmith CH. Journal of Orthopedic and Sports Physical Therapy. 2009 May;39(5):400-17.
- ↑ 2.0 2.1 Vernon H, Mior S. The neck disability index: A study of reliability and validity. Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics, 1991, 14:409-15
- ↑ Mark Chan Ci En, Dean A. Clair and Stephen J. Edmondston. Manual Therapy, 2009, 14(4):433-438
- ↑ Riddle DL, Stratford PW. Use of generic versus region specific functional status measures on patients with cervical spine disorders. Physical Therapy, 1998;78:951-963
- ↑ Stratford PW, Riddle DL, Binkley JM et al (1999) Using the neck disability index to make decisions concerning individual patients Physiotherapy Canada, 2,107-112.
- ↑ Jette DU, Jette AM. Physical therapy and health outcomes in patients with spinal impairments. Physical Therapy, 1996; 76:930-45
