Manual Assessment of Respiratory Motion (MARM): Difference between revisions

(Created page with "<div class="editorbox"> '''Original Editor '''- The Open Physio project. '''Top Contributors''' - {{Special:Contributors/{{FULLPAGENAME}}}}   </div> == Objective<br>...")
 
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
<div class="editorbox">
<div class="editorbox">
'''Original Editor '''- The [[Open Physio]] project.
'''Top Contributors''' - {{Special:Contributors/{{FULLPAGENAME}}}} &nbsp;  
'''Top Contributors''' - {{Special:Contributors/{{FULLPAGENAME}}}} &nbsp;  
</div>  
</div>  
== Objective<br>  ==
== Objective<br>  ==


The '''Berg balance scale''' is used to objectively determine a patient's ability (or inability) to safely [[Balance|balance]] during a series of predetermined tasks. It is a 14 item list with each item consisting of a five-point ordinal scale ranging from 0 to 4, with 0 indicating the lowest level of function and 4 the highest level of function and takes approximately 20 minutes to complete. It does not include the assessment of gait.  
The MARM is a palpatory procedure based on the examiners interpretation and estimation of motion perceived by their hands at the posterior and lateral lower rib cage. The examiner using the MARM can gauge various aspects of breathing such as rate, regularity, but its particular utility is for assessing breathing pattern and the relative distribution of breathing motion between upper rib cage and lower rib cage and abdomen.<br>


== Intended Population<br>  ==
== Intended Population<br>  ==


Elderly population with impairment of balance, patients with acute [[Stroke|stroke]] (Berg et al 1995, Usuda et al 1998).


== Method of Use  ==


==== Equipment required  ====
Subjects with Dysfunctional Breathing or Altered Breathing<br>


{| width="40%" border="0" align="right" cellspacing="1" cellpadding="1" class="FCK__ShowTableBorders"
== Method of Use  ==
|-
| align="right" |
{{#ev:youtube|i_Jlc5kL6KU|350}} <ref>Kembe Frederick. 5253 Assessment Process Berg Balance Scale F.H.F. Available from: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i_Jlc5kL6KU[last accessed 08/02/13]</ref>


|}
The MARM also takes into account the form of the spinal column, whose extended or flexed form constitutes a third degree of freedom of breathing movement (Smith and Mead 1986). Extension of the spinal column increases the distance between the pubic symphysis and xiphoid process, elevates the ribcage, facilitating upward motion of the sternum/upper thorax (pump-handle motion) as well as abdominal expansion. Thus, it facilitates inhalation in a vertical direction (‘length breathing’). By contrast, a slumped posture inhibits the vertical movement of inhalation, increases pressure of abdominal contents to increase diaphragm length and promotes lateral expansion and sideways elevation of the lower ribs or bucket-handle movement. Thus, it facilitates inhalation in a horizontal direction (‘width breathing’). The<br>'''MARM is able to differentiate between these breathing patterns and assess asymmetry between the two sides of the body.''' In case of scoliosis or sideways distortion of the spinal column there is a marked difference in breathing movement between the left and right sides of the body and this can be registered clearly by the examiners two hands. Such asymmetry adds even more degrees of freedom of breathing<br>movement, but would remain unobserved when one relies on assessment by RIP.<br><br>


*A ruler
An assumption of the MARM procedure is that breathing is a global movement of expansion (inhalation) and contraction (exhalation) of the body. From the manual assessment of motion at the lower ribs the examiner constructs a mental picture of global breathing motion, represented by an upper line and a lower line, originating from the centre of a circle or ellipse, together creating a slice in a pie chart, which represents the area of expansion. Specific features of the global change in form that can be estimated are: the degree that the sternum and upper thorax are lifted upwards, the degree that the lower ribs lift and expand sideways and the degree that diaphragmatic descent expands the abdomen outwards. The predominance of motion in either the upper rib cage/sternum or the lower rib cage/abdomen determines the direction of the global change with inhalation, as either predominantly in an upward or downward direction and the shape as either elongation or widening. Individuals may differ in their breathing response to postural change. For example when the spine is extended inspiration may result in a general increase in breathing motion with greater involvement of both upper thorax and abdomen or result in upward elevation of the chest with little increase or paradoxical decrease in abdominal motion.<br><br>With the MARM, having the subject intentionally breathe in different ways, the examiner can test the functionality of breathing. <ref>Rosalba Courtney, Jan van Dixhoorn,fckLRMarc Cohen; Evaluation of Breathing Pattern: Comparison of a Manual Assessment of Respiratory Motion(MARM) and Respiratory Induction Plethysmography. Appl Psychophysiol Biofeedback (2008) 33:91–100</ref><br>
*2 standard chairs (one with arm rests, one without)
*A footstool or step
*15 ft walkway
*Stopwatch or wristwatch


==== The scale ====
== Reference<br> ==


Name: __________________________________ Date: ___________________<br>  
<ref>Rosalba Courtney, Jan van Dixhoorn,fckLRMarc Cohen; Evaluation of Breathing Pattern: Comparison of a Manual Assessment of Respiratory Motion(MARM) and Respiratory Induction Plethysmography. Appl Psychophysiol Biofeedback (2008) 33:91–100</ref><br>  
 
Location: ________________________________ Rater: ___________________<br>
 
ITEM DESCRIPTION SCORE (0-4)<br>
 
Sitting to standing ________<br> Standing unsupported ________<br> Sitting unsupported ________<br> Standing to sitting ________<br> Transfers ________<br> Standing with eyes closed ________<br> Standing with feet together ________<br> Reaching forward with outstretched arm ________<br> Retrieving object from floor ________<br> Turning to look behind ________<br> Turning 360 degrees ________<br> Placing alternate foot on stool ________<br> Standing with one foot in front ________<br> Standing on one foot ________<br>  
 
Total ________<br>  


<br>  
<br>  


==== General instructions for completing the scale ====
== Evidence ==


Please document each task and/or give instructions as written. When scoring, please record the lowest response category that applies for each item.
=== Reliability&amp; Validity<br> ===


In most items, the subject is asked to maintain a given position for a specific time. Progressively more points are deducted if:


*the time or distance requirements are not met
*the subject’s performance warrants supervision
*the subject touches an external support or receives assistance from the examiner


The subject should understand that they must maintain their balance while attempting the tasks. The choices of which leg to stand on or how far to reach are left to the subject. Poor judgment will adversely influence the performance and the scoring.
The MARM appears to be a valid and reliable clinical and research tool for assessing breathing movement with good inter-examiner and a greater ability to distinguish vertical ribcage motion. Further studies to confirm its clinical utility are warranted.
 
Equipment required for testing is a stopwatch or watch with a second hand, and a ruler or other indicator of 2, 5, and 10 inches. Chairs used during testing should be a reasonable height. Either a step or a stool of average step height may be used for item # 12.
 
== Reference<br>  ==
 
Berg K, Wood-Dauphinee S, Williams JI, Gayton D: Measuring balance in the elderly: Preliminary development of an instrument. Physiotherapy Canada, 41:304-311, 1989<ref name="Berg1">Berg K, Wood-Dauphinee S, Williams JI, Gayton D: Measuring balance in the elderly: Preliminary development of an instrument.fckLRPhysiotherapy Canada, 41:304-311, 1989.</ref>.<br>
 
Berg K, Wood-Dauphinee S, Williams JI, Maki, B: Measuring balance in the elderly: Validation of an instrument. Can. J. Pub. Health, July/August supplement 2:S7-11, 1992.<ref name="Berg2">Berg K, Wood-Dauphinee S, Williams JI, Maki, B: Measuring balance in the elderly: Validation of an instrument. Can. J. Pub. Health, July/August supplement 2:S7-11, 1992.</ref>
 
== Evidence  ==
 
=== Reliability  ===
 
Studies of various elderly populations (N = 31–101, 60–90 + years of age) have shown high intrarater and interrater reliability (ICC =.98,14,15 ratio of variability among subjects to total = .96–1.0,16 rs =.8817). Test-retest reliability in 22 people with hemiparesis is also high (ICC [2,1]=.98).  


<br>  
<br>  


Berg K et al (1995) The Balance Scale: reliability assessment for elderly residents and patients with an acute stroke Scandinavian Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine 27, 27-36<br>
=== Validity  ===
Content validity of the BBS was established in a 3-phase development process involving 32 health care professionals who were experts working in geriatric settings. Criterion-related validity has been supported by moderate to high correlations between BBS scores and other functional measurements in a variety of older adults with disability.
Berg K, Wood-Dauphine SL, Williams JL, Gayton D (1992) Measuring balance in the elderly: validation of an instrument Canadian Journal of Public Health S2: s7-s11.
Usuda S, Araya K, Umehara K, Endo M, Shimizu T, Endo F (1998) Construct validity of functional balance scale in stroke inpatients Journal of Physical Therapy Science 10, 53-56.
Whitney, S., D. Wrisley, et al. (2003). Concurrent validity of the Berg Balance Scale and the Dynamic Gait Index in people with vestibular dysfunction. Physiother Res Int 8(4): 178-86. <br>
=== Responsiveness  ===
Increasing age has not been shown to correlate with decreasing BBS scores.
Steffen, T. M., T. A. Hacker, et al. (2002). Age- and gender-related test performance in community-dwelling elderly people: Six-Minute Walk Test, Berg Balance Scale, Timed Up and Go Test, and gait speeds. Phys Ther 82(2): 128-37.
Mao, H. F., I. P. Hsueh, et al. (2002). Analysis and comparison of the psychometric properties of three balance measures for stroke patients. Stroke 33(4): 1022-7.
Stevenson, T. J. (2001). Detecting change in patients with stroke using the Berg Balance Scale. Aust J Physiother 47(1): 29-38.
Salbach, N. M., N. E. Mayo, et al. (2001). Responsiveness and predictability of gait speed and other disability measures in acute stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 82(9): 1204-12.<br>
=== Miscellaneous<br>  ===
Harada N, Chiu V, Damron-Rodrick J, Fowler E, Siu A, Reuber D (1995) Screening for balance and mobility impairment in elderly individuals living in residential care facilities Physical Therapy 75, 6, 462-469.
Piotrowski A, Cole J (1994) Clinical measures of balance and functional assessment in elderly persons Australian Physiotherapy 40, 3, 183-188.
Russo SG (1997) Clinical balance measures: literature resources Neurology Report 21, 1, 29-36.
Whitney SL, Poole JL, Cass SP (1998) A review of balance instruments for older adults American Journal of Occupational Therapy 52, 8, 666-71.
Thorbahn LD, Newton RA (1996) Use of the Berg Balance Test to predict falls in elderly persons Phys Ther 76, 6, 576-83.
Lajoie, Y. and S. P. Gallagher (2004). Predicting falls within the elderly community: comparison of postural sway, reaction time, the Berg balance scale and the Activities-specific Balance Confidence (ABC) scale for comparing fallers and non-fallers. Arch Gerontol Geriatr 38(1): 11-26.
Wee, J. Y., H. Wong, et al. (2003). Validation of the Berg Balance Scale as a predictor of length of stay and discharge destination in stroke rehabilitation. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 84(5): 731-5.
Chiu, A. Y., S. S. Au-Yeung, et al. (2003). A comparison of four functional tests in discriminating fallers from non-fallers in older people. Disabil Rehabil 25(1): 45-50.
Feld, J. A., M. H. Rabadi, et al. (2001). Berg balance scale and outcome measures in acquired brain injury. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 15(3): 239-44.
Wee, J. Y., S. D. Bagg, et al. (1999). The Berg balance scale as a predictor of length of stay and discharge destination in an acute stroke rehabilitation setting. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 80(4): 448-52.
Whitney, S. L., J. L. Poole, et al. (1998). A review of balance instruments for older adults. Am J Occup Ther 52(8): 666-71.<br>
== Links  ==


*[http://www.strokecenter.org/trials/scales/berg.html http://www.strokecenter.org/trials/scales/berg.html]
*[[Media:Berg.pdf|Berg balance scale]]
*[[Media:Berg_balance_scale_with_instructions.pdf|Berg balance scale with instructions]]


== Recent Related Research (from [http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/ Pubmed])  ==
== Recent Related Research (from [http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/ Pubmed])  ==
<div class="researchbox">
<div class="researchbox">
<rss>http://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/erss.cgi?rss_guid=14_xQ7JEOWXDuoqfM8fnknjm_kLTkFNXzh17vH36R9mIfgiM9W|charset=UTF-8|short|max=10</rss>  
<rss>http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/erss.cgi?rss_guid=1Hi5ZYwmE-2AynAt7X2nM23JOGbnDKY2AE5Ht2d2bokfLrYsfz|charset=UTF-8|short|max=10</rss>  
</div>  
</div>  
== References  ==
== References  ==
Line 135: Line 46:
<references />  
<references />  


[[Category:Outcome_Measures]] [[Category:Older_People/Geriatrics|Geriatrics]] [[Category:Open_Physio]]
[[Category:Outcome_Measures]] [[Category:Open_Physio]]

Revision as of 13:03, 15 April 2014

Objective
[edit | edit source]

The MARM is a palpatory procedure based on the examiners interpretation and estimation of motion perceived by their hands at the posterior and lateral lower rib cage. The examiner using the MARM can gauge various aspects of breathing such as rate, regularity, but its particular utility is for assessing breathing pattern and the relative distribution of breathing motion between upper rib cage and lower rib cage and abdomen.

Intended Population
[edit | edit source]

Subjects with Dysfunctional Breathing or Altered Breathing

Method of Use[edit | edit source]

The MARM also takes into account the form of the spinal column, whose extended or flexed form constitutes a third degree of freedom of breathing movement (Smith and Mead 1986). Extension of the spinal column increases the distance between the pubic symphysis and xiphoid process, elevates the ribcage, facilitating upward motion of the sternum/upper thorax (pump-handle motion) as well as abdominal expansion. Thus, it facilitates inhalation in a vertical direction (‘length breathing’). By contrast, a slumped posture inhibits the vertical movement of inhalation, increases pressure of abdominal contents to increase diaphragm length and promotes lateral expansion and sideways elevation of the lower ribs or bucket-handle movement. Thus, it facilitates inhalation in a horizontal direction (‘width breathing’). The
MARM is able to differentiate between these breathing patterns and assess asymmetry between the two sides of the body. In case of scoliosis or sideways distortion of the spinal column there is a marked difference in breathing movement between the left and right sides of the body and this can be registered clearly by the examiners two hands. Such asymmetry adds even more degrees of freedom of breathing
movement, but would remain unobserved when one relies on assessment by RIP.

An assumption of the MARM procedure is that breathing is a global movement of expansion (inhalation) and contraction (exhalation) of the body. From the manual assessment of motion at the lower ribs the examiner constructs a mental picture of global breathing motion, represented by an upper line and a lower line, originating from the centre of a circle or ellipse, together creating a slice in a pie chart, which represents the area of expansion. Specific features of the global change in form that can be estimated are: the degree that the sternum and upper thorax are lifted upwards, the degree that the lower ribs lift and expand sideways and the degree that diaphragmatic descent expands the abdomen outwards. The predominance of motion in either the upper rib cage/sternum or the lower rib cage/abdomen determines the direction of the global change with inhalation, as either predominantly in an upward or downward direction and the shape as either elongation or widening. Individuals may differ in their breathing response to postural change. For example when the spine is extended inspiration may result in a general increase in breathing motion with greater involvement of both upper thorax and abdomen or result in upward elevation of the chest with little increase or paradoxical decrease in abdominal motion.

With the MARM, having the subject intentionally breathe in different ways, the examiner can test the functionality of breathing. [1]

Reference
[edit | edit source]

[2]


Evidence[edit | edit source]

Reliability& Validity
[edit | edit source]

The MARM appears to be a valid and reliable clinical and research tool for assessing breathing movement with good inter-examiner and a greater ability to distinguish vertical ribcage motion. Further studies to confirm its clinical utility are warranted.



Recent Related Research (from Pubmed)[edit | edit source]

Failed to load RSS feed from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/erss.cgi?rss_guid=1Hi5ZYwmE-2AynAt7X2nM23JOGbnDKY2AE5Ht2d2bokfLrYsfz|charset=UTF-8|short|max=10: Error parsing XML for RSS

References[edit | edit source]

References will automatically be added here, see adding references tutorial.

  1. Rosalba Courtney, Jan van Dixhoorn,fckLRMarc Cohen; Evaluation of Breathing Pattern: Comparison of a Manual Assessment of Respiratory Motion(MARM) and Respiratory Induction Plethysmography. Appl Psychophysiol Biofeedback (2008) 33:91–100
  2. Rosalba Courtney, Jan van Dixhoorn,fckLRMarc Cohen; Evaluation of Breathing Pattern: Comparison of a Manual Assessment of Respiratory Motion(MARM) and Respiratory Induction Plethysmography. Appl Psychophysiol Biofeedback (2008) 33:91–100