Male Urinary Symptom Impact Questionnaire (MUSIQ): Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
m (Text replace - 'Read more.' to ' ') |
||
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
'''Original Editor '''- [[User:Kirsten Ryan|Kirsten Ryan]] | '''Original Editor '''- [[User:Kirsten Ryan|Kirsten Ryan]] | ||
'''Lead Editors''' - Your name will be added here if you are a lead editor on this page. | '''Lead Editors''' - Your name will be added here if you are a lead editor on this page. | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
== Objective<br> == | == Objective<br> == |
Revision as of 15:56, 14 June 2013
Original Editor - Kirsten Ryan
Lead Editors - Your name will be added here if you are a lead editor on this page.
Objective
[edit | edit source]
The Male Urinary Symptom Impact Questionnaire (MUSIQ) was designed to measure the effect of interventions for urinary incontinence on health-related quality of life in men.[1]
Intended Population
[edit | edit source]
Community dwelling, racially diverse men with continence problems.[1]
Method of Use[edit | edit source]
The MUSIQ contains 32 items that are each coded on a 4-point scale of impact on quality of life: 0 = not at all, 1 = slightly, 2 = moderately, and 3 = greatly. Total scores range from 0 (no impact) to 96 (maximum impact).[1]
It takes about 20 minutes to complete by either self-administration or interview.[1]
Reference
[edit | edit source]
Evidence[edit | edit source]
Reliability[edit | edit source]
Internal consistency with Cronbach's coefficient was 0.95[1]
Validity[edit | edit source]
Content validity was supported with percentage agreement scores of 100% for clarity and 89% for item fit.[1]
The Pearson's correlation coefficient between the Male Urinary Distress Inventory and the MUSIQ was 0.59 (P < .001).[1]
Responsiveness[edit | edit source]
Miscellaneous
[edit | edit source]
The MUSIQ addresses the dimensions of mental/psychological health, social health, and global perceptions of function and well-being, focusing on emotional health, social contact, activity, stability of support, and sleep.
Test-retest reliability and sensitivity to change need to be further evaluated. Concurrent validity scores should also be correlated with another generic health-related quality of life instruement. Construct validity should also be reexamined with a larger more symptomatically diverse sample. There was a possibility of floor effect and therefore should be further studied.[1]
Links[edit | edit source]
Recent Related Research (from Pubmed)[edit | edit source]
Failed to load RSS feed from http://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/erss.cgi?rss_guid=1po-2YHvOZP78YGvM0C10-LbrLrBWf2BKUFN_sQ3iPNMefNQLW|charset=UTF-8|short|max=10: Error parsing XML for RSS
References[edit | edit source]
References will automatically be added here, see adding references tutorial.