Lumbar Discogenic Pain: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
<div class="editorbox"> | <div class="editorbox"> | ||
<p><b>Original Editors </b> - <a href="User:Jon Ford">Jon Ford</a> as part of the <a _fcknotitle="true" href="STOPS Project">STOPS Project</a>. | |||
</p><p><b>Lead Editors</b> - Your name will be added here if you are a lead editor on this page. <a href="Physiopedia:Editors">Read more.</a> | |||
</p> | |||
</div> | </div> | ||
<p>The anatomy and function of the lumbar interverebral disc has been well described in texts<span class="fck_mw_ref" _fck_mw_customtag="true" _fck_mw_tagname="ref" name="Bogduk 2012">Bogduk N. Clinical and radiological anatomy of the lumbar spine and sacrum. 5th ed. New York: Churchill Livingstone; 2012.</span>. However the diagnosis and management of discogenic pain is controversial. The aim of this article is to synthesise the evidence-based literature from the practitioner's perspective to improve clinical decision making and patient outcomes. | |||
The anatomy and function of the lumbar interverebral disc has been well described in texts<ref name="Bogduk 2012">Bogduk N. Clinical and radiological anatomy of the lumbar spine and sacrum. 5th ed. New York: Churchill Livingstone; 2012.</ | </p><p><br /> | ||
</p><p>Much of the controversy around discogenic pain comes from confusion and misinformation on diagnosis. Radiological tests such as CT scan and MRI are able to image the external and internal morphology of the intervertebral disc. However such changes in isolation do not predict the presence or absence of lumbar and/or related leg symptoms | |||
<br> | </p> | ||
<h2> References </h2> | |||
Much of the controversy around discogenic pain comes from confusion and misinformation on diagnosis. Radiological tests such as CT scan and MRI are able to image the external and internal morphology of the intervertebral disc. However such changes in isolation do not predict the presence or absence of lumbar and/or related leg symptoms | <p><span class="fck_mw_references" _fck_mw_customtag="true" _fck_mw_tagname="references" /> | ||
</p><a _fcknotitle="true" href="Category:Lumbar">Lumbar</a> | |||
< | |||
Revision as of 13:13, 7 June 2013
Original Editors - <a href="User:Jon Ford">Jon Ford</a> as part of the <a _fcknotitle="true" href="STOPS Project">STOPS Project</a>.
Lead Editors - Your name will be added here if you are a lead editor on this page. <a href="Physiopedia:Editors">Read more.</a>
The anatomy and function of the lumbar interverebral disc has been well described in textsBogduk N. Clinical and radiological anatomy of the lumbar spine and sacrum. 5th ed. New York: Churchill Livingstone; 2012.. However the diagnosis and management of discogenic pain is controversial. The aim of this article is to synthesise the evidence-based literature from the practitioner's perspective to improve clinical decision making and patient outcomes.
Much of the controversy around discogenic pain comes from confusion and misinformation on diagnosis. Radiological tests such as CT scan and MRI are able to image the external and internal morphology of the intervertebral disc. However such changes in isolation do not predict the presence or absence of lumbar and/or related leg symptoms
References
<a _fcknotitle="true" href="Category:Lumbar">Lumbar</a>
