Kim test: Difference between revisions

No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
<div class="editorbox">
<div class="editorbox">
'''Original Editor '''- Your name will be added here if you created the original content for this page.
'''Original Editor '''- [[User:Sarah McBride|Sarah McBride]]


'''Lead Editors''' - Your name will be added here if you are a lead editor on this page.&nbsp; [[Physiopedia:Editors|Read more.]]  
'''Lead Editors''' - Your name will be added here if you are a lead editor on this page.&nbsp; [[Physiopedia:Editors|Read more.]]  

Revision as of 17:42, 21 November 2009

Original Editor - Sarah McBride

Lead Editors - Your name will be added here if you are a lead editor on this page.  Read more.

Purpose
[edit | edit source]

add the purpose of this assessment technique here

Technique
[edit | edit source]

A - With the patient in a sitting position with the arm 90 degrees of abduction, the examiner holds the elbow and lateral aspect of the proximal arm, and a strong axial loading force is applied.

B - while the arm is elevated 45 degrees diagonally upward, downward and backward force is applied to the proximal arm. A sudden onset of posterior shoulder pain indicates a positive test result, regardless of accompanying posterior clunk of the humeral head.


Image:Kim_test.jpg

Evidence[edit | edit source]

The sensitivity of the Kim test was 80%, specificity was 94%. The interexaminer reliability between 2 examiners was 0.91.

The accuracy of the jerk test in detecting a posteroinferior labral lesion was the following: sensitivity, 73%; specificity, 98%. 

The Kim test was more sensitive in detecting a predominantly inferior labral lesion, whereas the jerk test was more sensitive in detecting a predominantly posterior labral lesion. The sensitivity in detecting a posteroinferior labral lesion increased to 97% when the 2 tests were combined.

Resources[edit | edit source]

add any relevant resources here

Recent Related Research (from Pubmed)[edit | edit source]

Failed to load RSS feed from http://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/erss.cgi?rss_guid=1RAka_j-eJMq9m-8tZ4JPSH84HkSJyeolTV7Ihs1wGGUkEuwCQ|charset=UTF-8|short|max=10: Error parsing XML for RSS

References[edit | edit source]

References will automatically be added here, see adding references tutorial.