ICF and Application in Clinical Practice

This article or area is currently under construction and may only be partially complete. Please come back soon to see the finished work! (10.09.2022)

Original Editor - Ewa Jaraczewska based on the course by Patricia Saleeby

Top Contributors - Ewa Jaraczewska, Jess Bell and Tarina van der Stockt  

Introduction[edit | edit source]

A comprehensive and holistic nature of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) makes it extremely useful in clinical practice. [1] The primary purpose of applying the ICF into clinical practice is to establish a common language for defining health and health-related states between different providers.[2] It improves communication in decision making among healthcare and social care professionals, which is essential for making more informed assessments, developing more effective interventions, and achieving good patient outcomes.[1]

Overview of ICF[edit | edit source]

The ICF defines the interaction between health conditions, personal and social factors, daily life activities and social life.[3]The relationship between these various domains and components is reciprocal, which explains how they interact with one another.[1]

The following are the characteristics of the ICF:[4]

  • The ICF is universal: applies to all people regardless of age, gender, socioeconomic and health condition.
  • The ICF is neutral : does not relate person's functioning to the cause of their health status.
  • The ICF uses neutral language when describing health and health-related states.
  • The ICF provides continuum between functioning and disability.

Framework[edit | edit source]

The ICF is a biopsychosocial model of functioning, health and disability. By using a standard language to define and measure disability, the ICF helps to explain how person's body problems and social circumstances effect person's functioning.

Definitions for the ICF Domains/Components[edit | edit source]

Based on the ICF model, the person is viewed in terms of their health conditions, their body functions and structures, their activities and participation, and their environmental and personal factors.[1]

  • Health condition: "an umbrella term for disease, disorder, injury, trauma"[4]
  • Body Functions:" physiological functions of body system, including psychological functions"[4]
  • Body Structures: "anatomical parts of the body, such as organ, limbs and their components"[4]
  • Activity: "execution of a task or action by an individual".[4] Activity limitations describes the problems or issues at the level of the individual.[1]
  • Participation:"involvement in a life situation". [4]Participation restrictions are problems the individuals may experience in their life situation or within environmental context.[1]
  • Environmental factors: "physical, social and attitudinal environment in which people live".[4]
  • Personal factors: "particular background of an individual's life and living".[4]

You can learn more about ICF components and ICF qualifiers here.

Case Study[1][edit | edit source]

Case study: A patient sustained a burn injury to the hand causing damage to the integrity of the skin structure.

Goal:To define ICF codes that correspond to this patient's injury for the purpose of assessmentHealth condition (ICD-11): Burn injury to the hand

  • ND95:Burn of wrist or hand
    • ND95.3: Burn of wrist or hand, full thickness burn

Body structure codes (s codes) according to specificity :

  • s810: structures of the area of skin
  • s8102: skin of the upper extremity

Body functions (b codes) following the skin healing process:

  • b810: protective functions of the skin may be impaired temporarily
  • b820: functions of the skin for repairing breaks and other damage to the skin (from wound stage to scar formation)
    • Inclusion and exclusion criteria can be applied to the body functions domain:
      • Inclusion: function of scab formation, healing, scaring; bruising and keloid formation
      • Exclusion: protective function of the skin; other functions of the skin.

Activities and Participation (d codes) can be restricted due to nerve damage, or poor healing, which can effect long term mobility and hand function, including:

  • d445: hand and arm use
  • d440: finer use of the hand
    • d4401:use one or both hands to seize or hold something (example: grasping a tool or a door knob)
  • d550: eating (example: "carrying out the coordinated tasks and actions of eating food that has been served, bringing it to the mouth and consuming it in culturally accepted ways, cutting or breaking food into pieces, opening bottles and cans, using eating implements, having meals, feasting, or dining".)
  • d750: limited or lack off informal social relationships including meeting with a neighbour or participation in happy hour with co-workers due to cosmetic concerns and body image distress.
  • d845: no being able to maintain the job due to anxiety and perceived stigma related to scarring in the area of the hand.

Environment(e codes)

  • e460: not comfortable going out shopping due to societal attitude towards visible scars, causing person's anxiety

Core Sets[edit | edit source]

ICF Core Sets (ICF­CS) are " selection of essential categories from the full ICF classification that are considered most relevant to describe the functioning of a person with a specific health condition or in a specific healthcare context". [5] Their purpose is to facilitate assessments in clinical practices and research.[6]

The ICF Core Sets are shortlists chosen from over 1400 ICF categories describing functioning, disability and health. They are developed for acute, early post acute and longterm conditions, but they are also categorised as neurological, musculoskeletal, cardiopulmonary conditions, spinal cord injury and vocational rehabilitation. [5] Each ICFCS has its comprehensive and brief versions. Brief version of ICFCS contains categories, that describe functioning at its minimum standard.[5]

The process of the ICF Core Set creation is complex and includes three phases:[5]

  • Phase 1: Collecting the evidence that contains empirical multi-centre study, a systematic literature review, a qualitative study and an expert survey who are only health professionals who practise with clients, but also the clients with a specific health condition[1]
  • Phase 2: The international consensus conference
  • Phase 3: Implementation of ICF­CSs by introducing them into practice

The purposes of using the ICF Core Sets in clinical practice can be as follows:[7]

  • to help with a selection of an appropriate combination of outcome measures
  • to assist with selection of a tool in developing comprehensive outcome measures
  • to describe patterns of disability [41].
  • to inform about the magnitude, the location and the nature of any problem of functioning.
  • to highlight strengths and weaknesses of an individual-patient
  • to describe changes in a patient’s functional profiles over time [42].




Clinical Forms[edit | edit source]

Rehabilitation Problem-Solving Form (RPS-Form)[edit | edit source]

Physical Therapy Clinical Reasoning and Reflection Tool (PTCRT)[edit | edit source]

Cross-Walking of the ICF[edit | edit source]

Resources[edit | edit source]

  • bulleted list
  • x

or

  1. numbered list
  2. x

References[edit | edit source]

  1. 1.0 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4 1.5 1.6 1.7 Saleeby P. ICF and Application in Clinical Practice Course. Plus 2022
  2. Aims of the ICF. Available form https://www.icf-elearning.com/wp-content/uploads/ [last access 9.09.2022]
  3. Pasqualotto L, Lascioli A. ICF-based functional profile in education and rehabilitation: a multidisciplinary pilot experience. Journal of advanced health care, 2020; 2(1)
  4. 4.0 4.1 4.2 4.3 4.4 4.5 4.6 4.7 The ICF model. Available from https://www.icf-elearning.com/wp-content/uploads/articulate_uploads/ [last access 9.09.2022]
  5. 5.0 5.1 5.2 5.3 Selb M, Escorpizo R, Kostanjsek N, Stucki G, Üstün B, Cieza A. A guide on how to develop an International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health Core Set. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2015 Feb;51(1):105-17.
  6. Karlsson E, Gustafsson J. Validation of the international classification of functioning, disability and health (ICF) core sets from 2001 to 2019–a scoping review. Disability and rehabilitation. 2022 Jul 3;44(14):3736-48.
  7. Perin C, Bolis M, Limonta M, Meroni R, Ostasiewicz K, Cornaggia CM, Alouche SR, da Silva Matuti G, Cerri CG, Piscitelli D. Differences in rehabilitation needs after stroke: a similarity analysis on the ICF core set for stroke. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2020 Jan;17(12):4291.