Fitzgerald Test: Difference between revisions
Rachael Lowe (talk | contribs) m (Blanked the page) |
Rachael Lowe (talk | contribs) mNo edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
<div class="editorbox"> '''Original Editor '''- [[User:Rachael Lowe|Rachael Lowe]] | |||
'''Top Contributors''' - {{Special:Contributors/{{FULLPAGENAME}}}}</div> | |||
== Purpose == | |||
The Fitzgerald test utilises two different test positions to determine if the patient has an anterior or posterior labral tear. | |||
== Technique == | |||
To test for an anterior labral tear, the patient lies supine while the physical therapist (PT) performs flexion, external rotation, and full abduction of the hip, followed by extending the hip, internal rotation, and adduction. To test for a posterior labral tear, the PT performs passive extension, abduction, external rotation, from the position of full hip flexion, internal rotation, and adduction while the patient is supine. Tests are considered to be positive with pain reproduction with or without an audible click<ref name="LHJ">Leiboid M, Huijbregts P, Jensen R. Concurrent Criterion-Related Validity of Physical Examination Tests for Hip Labral Lesions: A Systematic Review. The Journal of Manual Manipulative Therapy. [online]. 2008;16(2):E24-41.</ref> <ref name="LS">Lewis CL, Sahrmann SA. Acetabular labral tears. Physical therapy. 2006 Jan 1;86(1):110-21. </ref>. The Fitzgerald test has a sensitivity of .98<ref name="LHJ" /><ref name="BRW">Burgess RM, Rushton A, Wright C, Daborn C. The validity and accuracy of clinical diagnostic tests used to detect labral pathology of the hip: A systematic review. Manual Therapy 16 (2011) 318 – 326.</ref>. | |||
<clinicallyrelevant id="83479864" title="Fitzgerald Test - Anterior Labrum" /> | |||
<clinicallyrelevant id="83479860" title="Fitzgerald Test - Posterior Labrum" /> | |||
== Evidence == | |||
Sensitivity is reported to be 1.00. For inter-rater reliability of the flexion-internal rotation-adduction-impingement test, which is described like the Fitzgerald test for anterior labral tears, Kappa was 0.58 with a 95% confidence interval of (0.29–0.87).29 | |||
== Resources == | |||
add any relevant resources here | |||
== References == | |||
<references /> | |||
Revision as of 14:46, 18 June 2019
Purpose[edit | edit source]
The Fitzgerald test utilises two different test positions to determine if the patient has an anterior or posterior labral tear.
Technique[edit | edit source]
To test for an anterior labral tear, the patient lies supine while the physical therapist (PT) performs flexion, external rotation, and full abduction of the hip, followed by extending the hip, internal rotation, and adduction. To test for a posterior labral tear, the PT performs passive extension, abduction, external rotation, from the position of full hip flexion, internal rotation, and adduction while the patient is supine. Tests are considered to be positive with pain reproduction with or without an audible click[1] [2]. The Fitzgerald test has a sensitivity of .98[1][3].
Fitzgerald Test - Anterior Labrum video provided by Clinically Relevant
Fitzgerald Test - Posterior Labrum video provided by Clinically Relevant
Evidence[edit | edit source]
Sensitivity is reported to be 1.00. For inter-rater reliability of the flexion-internal rotation-adduction-impingement test, which is described like the Fitzgerald test for anterior labral tears, Kappa was 0.58 with a 95% confidence interval of (0.29–0.87).29
Resources[edit | edit source]
add any relevant resources here
References[edit | edit source]
- ↑ 1.0 1.1 Leiboid M, Huijbregts P, Jensen R. Concurrent Criterion-Related Validity of Physical Examination Tests for Hip Labral Lesions: A Systematic Review. The Journal of Manual Manipulative Therapy. [online]. 2008;16(2):E24-41.
- ↑ Lewis CL, Sahrmann SA. Acetabular labral tears. Physical therapy. 2006 Jan 1;86(1):110-21.
- ↑ Burgess RM, Rushton A, Wright C, Daborn C. The validity and accuracy of clinical diagnostic tests used to detect labral pathology of the hip: A systematic review. Manual Therapy 16 (2011) 318 – 326.
