Family Centred Intervention and Early Diagnosis: Difference between revisions

mNo edit summary
(added info from google doc)
Line 3: Line 3:


'''Top Contributors''' - {{Special:Contributors/{{FULLPAGENAME}}}}      
'''Top Contributors''' - {{Special:Contributors/{{FULLPAGENAME}}}}      
</div>  
</div>
== Introduction ==


== Family Centered Intervention ==
== Early Intervention ==
Early intervention services are a federal program that supports and provides resources for families of special needs infants and toddlers 0-3 years old. Children with developmental disabilities are entitled to various services including


==== Solution Focused Coaching ====
* PT
* OT
* Speech
* Vision
* Nursing
* Assistive Technology
* Special Education


=== Early Diagnosis and Referral ===
Evaluations and follow up care is provided in the childs least restrictive or natural environment, typically at home or daycare centre. (TOMASELLO) Traditionally, early intervention has worked off an expert model where the therapist created goals and provided follow up care based on the impairment. Any interventions provided by the family was in adjunct to the healthcare provider. The overall care and decision making for the child was in the hands of the therapist. This model is referred to as a rehabilitation model. (DELMAU)


=== ''Cerebral Palsy'' ===
== Family-Centred Care ==
The most common physical disability in childhood is cerebral palsy (CP) and occurs for every 1 in 500 births.  CP is caused by brain injury early in development and presents with disorders in posture and movement leading to activity limitation.<ref name=":2" /> Traditionally, a diagnosis would be concluded between 12 and 24 months of age when symptoms were evident.  New research however, reveals that signs and symptoms of CP appear and develop before 2 years of age.  Using a combination of medical history, neuroimaging and standardized motor and neurological assessments for infants under 2, the risk of cerebral palsy can be now be predicted.<ref name=":0">Novak I, Morgan C, Adde L, Blackman J, Boyd RN, Brunstrom-Hernandez J, Cioni G, Damiano D, Darrah J, Eliasson AC, De Vries LS. [https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamapediatrics/article-abstract/2636588 Early, accurate diagnosis and early intervention in cerebral palsy: advances in diagnosis and treatment]. JAMA pediatrics. 2017 Sep 1;171(9):897-907.</ref>  The tools below are commonly used for infants under 2 to estimate the risk of a cerebral palsy diagnosis.
==== Hammersmith Infant Neurological Examination ====
[http://hammersmith-neuro-exam.com/ The Hammersmith Infant Neurological Examination (HINE)] has shown high sensitivity in detecting CP in infants, (98% in infants under 5 months old, 90% in infants over 5 months old.<ref name=":0" /> This free tool with good interobserver reliability is typically utilized on infants between 3 and 24 months.  Neurological function is tested with 26 different criterion based on movements, behavior, cranial nerve function, protective reactions, reflexes and gross and fine motor function.  Test results not only identify children at risk, but details the severity and type of motor impairment.  Having this specific information allows early intervention to be targeted to the the specific neurological sequelae. <ref name=":2">Romeo DM, Ricci D, Brogna C, Mercuri E. Use of the Hammersmith Infant Neurological Examination in infants with cerebral palsy: a critical review of the literature. Developmental Medicine & Child Neurology. 2016 Mar;58(3):240-5.</ref>


==== Gross Motor Function Classification System ====
[https://www.canchild.ca/system/tenon/assets/attachments/000/000/058/original/GMFCS-ER_English.pdf The Gross Motor Function Classification System (GMFCS)]  tool classifies children under 2 into 5 distinct levels depending on movement that is self-initiated accenting mobility, transfers and sitting.  These criterion relate to functional limitations for the child versus quality of movement.


Gross Motor Function Classification System – Expanded and Revised (GMFCS – E & R)
Over the past decade, there has been a shift from the therapist-driven model to a family education/empowerment model. Research has shown early intervention is more effective when it has the following components:


* LEVEL I: Infants move in and out of sitting and floor sit with both hands free to manipulate objects. Infants crawl on hands and knees, pull to stand and take steps holding on to furniture. Infants walk between 18 months and 2 years of age without the need for any assistive mobility device.
* Family-centred
* Collaborative effort between family and therapists
* Within the child's natural environment


* LEVEL II: Infants maintain floor sitting but may need to use their hands for support to maintain balance. Infants creep on their stomach or crawl on hands and knees. Infants may pull to stand and take steps holding on to furniture.
(SPEAKER)


* LEVEL III: Infants maintain floor sitting when the low back is supported. Infants roll and creep forward on their stomachs.  
Family-centred care (FCC) transfers from the role of planning and goal setting from the therapist to the family. The therapist works as a “coach” to help families identify needs, goals and solutions.  


* LEVEL IV: Infants have head control but trunk support is required for floor sitting. Infants can roll to supine and may roll to prone.
The FCS model has specific roles for clinicians and families:


* LEVEL V: Physical impairments limit voluntary control of movement. Infants are unable to maintain antigravity head and trunk postures in prone and sitting. Infants require adult assistance to roll.
Clinicians:
<nowiki>***</nowiki> Less favorable outcomes are noted in low and middle income countries with over 73% of children classified as GMFCS level of III-IV. <ref name=":1">Jahan I, Muhit M, Hardianto D, Laryea F, Chhetri AB, Smithers‐Sheedy H, McIntyre S, Badawi N, Khandaker G. Epidemiology of cerebral palsy in low‐and middle‐income countries: preliminary findings from an international multi‐centre cerebral palsy register. Developmental Medicine & Child Neurology. 2021 May 24.</ref>


==== The Prechtl General Movement Assessment ====
* provide coaching and education to increase knowledge and impart support for parents and caregivers.
[https://general-movements-trust.info/5/home The Prechtl General Movement Assessment]
* support parents and caregivers to build parental capacity and expertise, prioritizing a positive parent-child relationship




r. Clinicians should understand the importance of prompt referral to diagnostic-specific early intervention to optimize infant motor and cognitive plasticity, prevent secondary complications, and enhance caregiver well-being.
Families:


Early, Accurate Diagnosis and Early Intervention in Cerebral Palsy: Advances in Diagnosis and Treatment. J Novak et al (2017). AMA pediatrics, 2017 171(9), 897–907.
* Parents’ goals and aspirations must be central to the intervention
* Parent participation is important to support the need for the frequent practice of activities that lead to skilled movement and functional independence (speaker)


== Resources  ==
When families are involved in the care and decisions of their child, the family and the child reap better outcomes. (DELMAU)
*bulleted list
*x
or


#numbered list
==== Solution Focused Coaching ====
#x
Traditionally, early intervention was problem-oriented with a focus on identifying impairments in the body. Interventions were targeted at fixing the dysfunction and decisions about care were solely made by the therapist. Contrastly, in solution focused coaching (SFC) the therapist and family work together utilizing the child’s strengths to envision possibilities and seek solutions to meet the family's needs and targeted goals.(Baldwin, speaker). With SFC, three key factors are important:


== References  ==
* Therapists coach families toward the creation of goals and envisioned future
1. Novak I, Morgan C, Adde L, Blackman J, Boyd RN, Brunstrom-Hernandez J, Cioni G, Damiano D, Darrah J, Eliasson AC, De Vries LS. [https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamapediatrics/article-abstract/2636588 Early, accurate diagnosis and early intervention in cerebral palsy: advances in diagnosis and treatment]. JAMA pediatrics. 2017 Sep 1;171(9):897-907.
* Family empowerment is a priority
* Use of infants strengths and abilities versus problems for goal setting (SPEAKER)


2.  Jahan I, Muhit M, Hardianto D, Laryea F, Chhetri AB, Smithers‐Sheedy H, McIntyre S, Badawi N, Khandaker G. [https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/dmcn.14926 Epidemiology of cerebral palsy in low‐and middle‐income countries: preliminary findings from an international multi‐centre cerebral palsy register]. Developmental Medicine & Child Neurology. 2021 May 24.
=== Early Diagnosis and Referral ===


3. Romeo DM, Ricci D, Brogna C, Mercuri E. [https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/dmcn.12876 Use of the Hammersmith Infant Neurological Examination in infants with cerebral palsy: a critical review of the literature]. Developmental Medicine & Child Neurology. 2016 Mar;58(3):240-5.
=== Cerebral Palsy ===
The most common physical disability in childhood is cerebral palsy (CP) and occurs for every 1 in 500 births. CP is caused by brain injury early in development and presents with disorders in posture and movement leading to activity limitation.<ref name=":1">Romeo DM, Ricci D, Brogna C, Mercuri E. [https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/dmcn.12876 Use of the Hammersmith Infant Neurological Examination in infants with cerebral palsy: a critical review of the literature]. Developmental Medicine & Child Neurology. 2016 Mar;58(3):240-5.</ref> Traditionally, a diagnosis would be concluded between 12 and 24 months of age when symptoms were evident. New research, however, reveals that signs and symptoms of CP appear and develop before 2 years of age. Using a combination of medical history, neuroimaging and standardized motor and neurological assessments for infants under 2, the risk of cerebral palsy can be now be predicted.<ref name=":0">Novak I, Morgan C, Adde L, Blackman J, Boyd RN, Brunstrom-Hernandez J, Cioni G, Damiano D, Darrah J, Eliasson AC, De Vries LS. [https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamapediatrics/article-abstract/2636588 Early, accurate diagnosis and early intervention in cerebral palsy: advances in diagnosis and treatment]. JAMA pediatrics. 2017 Sep 1;171(9):897-907.</ref> The tools below are commonly used for infants under 2 to estimate the risk of a cerebral palsy diagnosis.


4.
==== Hammersmith Infant Neurological Examination ====
The Hammersmith Infant Neurological Examination (HINE) has shown high sensitivity in detecting CP in infants, (98% in infants under 5 months old, 90% in infants over 5 months old.<ref name=":0" /> This free tool with good interobserver reliability is typically utilized on infants between 3 and 24 months. Neurological function is tested with 26 different criteria based on movements, behaviour, cranial nerve function, protective reactions, reflexes and gross and fine motor function. Test results not only identify children at risk but detail the severity and type of motor impairment. Having this specific information allows early intervention to be targeted to the specific neurological sequelae.<ref name=":1" />


5.
==== Gross Motor Function Classification System ====
The Gross Motor Function Classification System (GMFCS) tool classifies children under 2 into 5 distinct levels depending on the movement that is self-initiated accenting mobility, transfers and sitting. These criteria relate to functional limitations for the child versus quality of movement.


6.
Gross Motor Function Classification System – Expanded and Revised (GMFCS – E & R)


* LEVEL I: Infants move in and out of sitting and floor sit with both hands free to manipulate objects. Infants crawl on hands and knees, pull to stand and take steps holding on to furniture. Infants walk between 18 months and 2 years of age without the need for any assistive mobility device.
* LEVEL II: Infants maintain floor sitting but may need to use their hands for support to maintain balance. Infants creep on their stomach or crawl on hands and knees. Infants may pull to stand and take steps holding on to furniture.
* LEVEL III: Infants maintain floor sitting when the low back is supported. Infants roll and creep forward on their stomachs.
* LEVEL IV: Infants have head control but trunk support is required for floor sitting. Infants can roll to supine and may roll to prone.
* LEVEL V: Physical impairments limit voluntary control of movement. Infants are unable to maintain antigravity head and trunk postures in prone and sitting. Infants require adult assistance to roll.


<nowiki>***</nowiki> Less favorable outcomes are noted in low and middle income countries with over 73% of children classified as GMFCS level of III-IV.<ref>Jahan I, Muhit M, Hardianto D, Laryea F, Chhetri AB, Smithers‐Sheedy H, McIntyre S, Badawi N, Khandaker G. [https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/dmcn.14926 Epidemiology of cerebral palsy in low‐and middle‐income countries: preliminary findings from an international multi‐centre cerebral palsy register]. Developmental Medicine & Child Neurology. 2021 May 24.</ref>


==== The Prechtl General Movement Assessment ====
The Prechtl General Movement Assessment




r. Clinicians should understand the importance of prompt referral to diagnostic-specific early intervention to optimize infant motor and cognitive plasticity, prevent secondary complications and enhance caregiver well-being.


Morgan C, Fetters L, Adde L, Badawi N, Bancale A, Boyd RN, Chorna O, Cioni G, Damiano DL, Darrah J, de Vries LS. [https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamapediatrics/article-abstract/2780012 Early Intervention for Children Aged 0 to 2 Years With or at High Risk of Cerebral Palsy]: International Clinical Practice Guideline Based on Systematic Reviews. JAMA pediatrics. 2021 May 17.<references />Ulrich BD. [https://academic.oup.com/ptj/article/90/12/1868/2738019 Opportunities for early intervention based on theory, basic neuroscience, and clinical science]. Physical therapy. 2010 Dec 1;90(12):1868-80.
Early, Accurate Diagnosis and Early Intervention in Cerebral Palsy: Advances in Diagnosis and Treatment. J Novak et al (2017). AMA pediatrics, 2017 171(9), 897–907.


Whitall J, Clark JE. [https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0065240718300156?via%3Dihub A perception–action approach to understanding typical and atypical motor development. Advances in child development and behavior.] 2018 Jan 1;55:245-72.
== Resources  ==
*bulleted list
*x
or


Gordon AM. [https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1469-8749.2011.04066.x To constrain or not to constrain, and other stories of intensive upper extremity training for children with unilateral cerebral palsy]. Developmental Medicine & Child Neurology. 2011 Sep;53:56-61.
#numbered list
#x


Morgan C, Novak I, Dale RC, Guzzetta A, Badawi N. [https://daneshyari.com/article/preview/371092.pdf Single blind randomised controlled trial of GAME (Goals⿿ Activity⿿ Motor Enrichment) in infants at high risk of cerebral palsy]. Research in Developmental Disabilities. 2016 Aug 1;55:256-67.
== References  ==
 
<references />
Morgan C, Novak I, Dale RC, Guzzetta A, Badawi N. GAME (Goals-Activity-Motor Enrichment): [https://bmcneurol.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12883-014-0203-2 protocol of a single blind randomised controlled trial of motor training, parent education and environmental enrichment for infants at high risk of cerebral palsy]. BMC neurology. 2014 Dec;14(1):1-9.
 
Morgan C, Novak I, Dale RC, Badawi N. [https://bmcpediatr.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12887-015-0347-2 Optimising motor learning in infants at high risk of cerebral palsy: a pilot study. BMC pediatrics.] 2015 Dec;15(1):1-1.
 
Morgan C, Novak I, Badawi N. [https://www.researchgate.net/publication/255985647_Enriched_Environments_and_Motor_Outcomes_in_Cerebral_Palsy_Systematic_Review_and_Meta-analysis Enriched environments and motor outcomes in cerebral palsy: systematic review and meta-analysis. Pediatrics]. 2013 Sep 1;132(3):e735-46.
 
Morgan C, Darrah J, Gordon AM, Harbourne R, Spittle A, Johnson R, Fetters L. [https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/dmcn.13105 Effectiveness of motor interventions in infants with cerebral palsy: a systematic review. Developmental Medicine & Child Neurology]. 2016 Sep;58(9):900-9.
 
Jahnsen R, Odgaard-Jensen J, Larun L, Østensjø S, Myrhaug HT. [https://bmcpediatr.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12887-014-0292-5#Sec2 Intensive training of motor function and functional skills among young children with cerebral palsy: a systematic review and meta-analysis].
 
Nithianantharajah J, Hannan AJ. [https://www.nature.com/articles/nrn1970 Enriched environments, experience-dependent plasticity and disorders of the nervous system. Nature Reviews Neuroscience]. 2006 Sep;7(9):697-709.
 
Van Praag H, Kempermann G, Gage FH. [https://www.nature.com/articles/35044558 Neural consequences of enviromental enrichment]. Nature Reviews Neuroscience. 2000 Dec;1(3):191-8.
 
Valvano J. [https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15268999/ Activity-focused motor interventions for children with neurological conditions]. Physical & occupational therapy in pediatrics. 2004 Jan 1;24(1-2):79-107.

Revision as of 17:16, 12 November 2021

Early Intervention[edit | edit source]

Early intervention services are a federal program that supports and provides resources for families of special needs infants and toddlers 0-3 years old. Children with developmental disabilities are entitled to various services including

  • PT
  • OT
  • Speech
  • Vision
  • Nursing
  • Assistive Technology
  • Special Education

Evaluations and follow up care is provided in the childs least restrictive or natural environment, typically at home or daycare centre. (TOMASELLO) Traditionally, early intervention has worked off an expert model where the therapist created goals and provided follow up care based on the impairment. Any interventions provided by the family was in adjunct to the healthcare provider. The overall care and decision making for the child was in the hands of the therapist. This model is referred to as a rehabilitation model. (DELMAU)

Family-Centred Care[edit | edit source]

Over the past decade, there has been a shift from the therapist-driven model to a family education/empowerment model. Research has shown early intervention is more effective when it has the following components:

  • Family-centred
  • Collaborative effort between family and therapists
  • Within the child's natural environment

(SPEAKER)

Family-centred care (FCC) transfers from the role of planning and goal setting from the therapist to the family. The therapist works as a “coach” to help families identify needs, goals and solutions.  

The FCS model has specific roles for clinicians and families:

Clinicians:

  • provide coaching and education to increase knowledge and impart support for parents and caregivers.
  • support parents and caregivers to build parental capacity and expertise, prioritizing a positive parent-child relationship


Families:

  • Parents’ goals and aspirations must be central to the intervention
  • Parent participation is important to support the need for the frequent practice of activities that lead to skilled movement and functional independence (speaker)

When families are involved in the care and decisions of their child, the family and the child reap better outcomes. (DELMAU)

Solution Focused Coaching[edit | edit source]

Traditionally, early intervention was problem-oriented with a focus on identifying impairments in the body. Interventions were targeted at fixing the dysfunction and decisions about care were solely made by the therapist. Contrastly, in solution focused coaching (SFC) the therapist and family work together utilizing the child’s strengths to envision possibilities and seek solutions to meet the family's needs and targeted goals.(Baldwin, speaker). With SFC, three key factors are important:

  • Therapists coach families toward the creation of goals and envisioned future
  • Family empowerment is a priority
  • Use of infants strengths and abilities versus problems for goal setting (SPEAKER)

Early Diagnosis and Referral[edit | edit source]

Cerebral Palsy[edit | edit source]

The most common physical disability in childhood is cerebral palsy (CP) and occurs for every 1 in 500 births. CP is caused by brain injury early in development and presents with disorders in posture and movement leading to activity limitation.[1] Traditionally, a diagnosis would be concluded between 12 and 24 months of age when symptoms were evident. New research, however, reveals that signs and symptoms of CP appear and develop before 2 years of age. Using a combination of medical history, neuroimaging and standardized motor and neurological assessments for infants under 2, the risk of cerebral palsy can be now be predicted.[2] The tools below are commonly used for infants under 2 to estimate the risk of a cerebral palsy diagnosis.

Hammersmith Infant Neurological Examination[edit | edit source]

The Hammersmith Infant Neurological Examination (HINE) has shown high sensitivity in detecting CP in infants, (98% in infants under 5 months old, 90% in infants over 5 months old.[2] This free tool with good interobserver reliability is typically utilized on infants between 3 and 24 months. Neurological function is tested with 26 different criteria based on movements, behaviour, cranial nerve function, protective reactions, reflexes and gross and fine motor function. Test results not only identify children at risk but detail the severity and type of motor impairment. Having this specific information allows early intervention to be targeted to the specific neurological sequelae.[1]

Gross Motor Function Classification System[edit | edit source]

The Gross Motor Function Classification System (GMFCS) tool classifies children under 2 into 5 distinct levels depending on the movement that is self-initiated accenting mobility, transfers and sitting. These criteria relate to functional limitations for the child versus quality of movement.

Gross Motor Function Classification System – Expanded and Revised (GMFCS – E & R)

  • LEVEL I: Infants move in and out of sitting and floor sit with both hands free to manipulate objects. Infants crawl on hands and knees, pull to stand and take steps holding on to furniture. Infants walk between 18 months and 2 years of age without the need for any assistive mobility device.
  • LEVEL II: Infants maintain floor sitting but may need to use their hands for support to maintain balance. Infants creep on their stomach or crawl on hands and knees. Infants may pull to stand and take steps holding on to furniture.
  • LEVEL III: Infants maintain floor sitting when the low back is supported. Infants roll and creep forward on their stomachs.
  • LEVEL IV: Infants have head control but trunk support is required for floor sitting. Infants can roll to supine and may roll to prone.
  • LEVEL V: Physical impairments limit voluntary control of movement. Infants are unable to maintain antigravity head and trunk postures in prone and sitting. Infants require adult assistance to roll.

*** Less favorable outcomes are noted in low and middle income countries with over 73% of children classified as GMFCS level of III-IV.[3]

The Prechtl General Movement Assessment[edit | edit source]

The Prechtl General Movement Assessment


r. Clinicians should understand the importance of prompt referral to diagnostic-specific early intervention to optimize infant motor and cognitive plasticity, prevent secondary complications and enhance caregiver well-being.

Early, Accurate Diagnosis and Early Intervention in Cerebral Palsy: Advances in Diagnosis and Treatment. J Novak et al (2017). AMA pediatrics, 2017 171(9), 897–907.

Resources[edit | edit source]

  • bulleted list
  • x

or

  1. numbered list
  2. x

References[edit | edit source]

  1. 1.0 1.1 Romeo DM, Ricci D, Brogna C, Mercuri E. Use of the Hammersmith Infant Neurological Examination in infants with cerebral palsy: a critical review of the literature. Developmental Medicine & Child Neurology. 2016 Mar;58(3):240-5.
  2. 2.0 2.1 Novak I, Morgan C, Adde L, Blackman J, Boyd RN, Brunstrom-Hernandez J, Cioni G, Damiano D, Darrah J, Eliasson AC, De Vries LS. Early, accurate diagnosis and early intervention in cerebral palsy: advances in diagnosis and treatment. JAMA pediatrics. 2017 Sep 1;171(9):897-907.
  3. Jahan I, Muhit M, Hardianto D, Laryea F, Chhetri AB, Smithers‐Sheedy H, McIntyre S, Badawi N, Khandaker G. Epidemiology of cerebral palsy in low‐and middle‐income countries: preliminary findings from an international multi‐centre cerebral palsy register. Developmental Medicine & Child Neurology. 2021 May 24.