Ethical Reasoning: Difference between revisions

mNo edit summary
mNo edit summary
Line 4: Line 4:
</div>  
</div>  
== Introduction ==
== Introduction ==
The ability to effectively address ethical dilemmas is an essential component of health care. The emphasis in ethical reasoning is on a sensible progression from the facts of the situation to a morally sound decision.  To help us in this ethical reasoning process, an ethics “workup”<ref name=":0">Fleming D.A., [https://medicine.missouri.edu/sites/default/files/Ethical_Reasoning.doc Practical Ethical Reasoning, School of Medicine], University of Missouri Health, 31st March, 2017
The ability to effectively address ethical dilemmas - ethical reasoning - is an essential component of health care. The emphasis in ethical reasoning is on a sensible progression from the facts of the situation to a morally sound decision.  To help us in this ethical reasoning process, an ethics “workup”<ref name=":0">Fleming D.A., [https://medicine.missouri.edu/sites/default/files/Ethical_Reasoning.doc Practical Ethical Reasoning, School of Medicine], University of Missouri Health, 31st March, 2017
</ref> (this one or a similar version) may be used by both organisations and individuals.   
</ref> (this one or a similar version) may be used, and is appropriate for use by all health professionals at both organisation and individual level.   
== The Ethics Workup<ref name=":0" /> ==
== The Ethics Workup<ref name=":0" /> ==
Using the '''five principal steps''' of the ethics workup, health professionals holding a variety of philosophical and religious positions regarding ethics can share a basic framework for thinking about and discussing morally troubling cases.
Using the '''five principal steps''' of the ethics workup, health professionals holding a variety of philosophical and religious positions regarding ethics can share a basic framework for thinking about and discussing morally troubling cases.


==== What are the Facts ====
=== What are the Facts ===
It is vitally important to clarify the facts of any situation in order to anchor the decision. These facts relate to the organizational, medical, and social circumstances of the case. For example, at the bedside both an estimate of prognosis and an understanding of the patient's wishes are relevant to an ethical decision about what is in the patient’s best interest.
It is vitally important to clarify the facts of any situation in order to anchor the decision. These facts relate to the organisational, medical, and social circumstances of the case. For example, at the bedside both an estimate of prognosis and an understanding of the patient's wishes are relevant to an ethical decision about what is in the patient’s best interest.


Resource allocation may be ethically relevant at the organizational level, but should provide a subsidiary influence at the bedside.
Resource allocation may be ethically relevant at the organisational level, but should provide a subsidiary influence at the bedside.


=== 5 Step Evaluation<ref name=":0" /> ===
=== 5 Step Evaluation<ref name=":0" /> ===
Line 23: Line 23:


==== '''1. Who?''' ====
==== '''1. Who?''' ====
Establish the Persons involved and/or affected.
Establish the Persons involved and/or affected. Remember, this may include family members of the patient, for instance.
 
Remember, this may include family members of the patient, for instance.


==== '''2. What?''' ====
==== '''2. What?''' ====
Line 32: Line 30:
* Personal preferences, beliefs, values
* Personal preferences, beliefs, values
* Resources available  
* Resources available  
* Organizational mission and policy
* Organisational mission and policy


==== '''3. Where?''' ====
==== '''3. Where?''' ====
Line 44: Line 42:


== Communication ==
== Communication ==
Clear and effective communication about the facts is crucial. Physical therapists may be instrumental in ensuring that the patient/family and other non-medical health professionals understand the medical facts while also making sure the health care team understands pertinent non-medical information about the patient and family. Administrators may be concerned for the welfare of the organization and those it serves as well as that of an individual patient.
Clear and effective communication about the facts is crucial. Physiotherapists may be instrumental in ensuring that the patient/family and other non-medical health professionals understand the medical facts while also making sure the health care team understands pertinent non-medical information about the patient and family. Administrators may be concerned for the welfare of the organisation and those it serves as well as that of an individual patient.


== What is the Ethical Concern? ==
== What is the Ethical Concern? ==
Line 53: Line 51:
* Questions of futility and withholding or withdrawing treatment
* Questions of futility and withholding or withdrawing treatment
* Appropriate surrogacy and substituted judgment
* Appropriate surrogacy and substituted judgment
* Organizational limitations of services
* Organisational limitations of services
* Policies and practices regarding privacy and confidentiality
* Policies and practices regarding privacy and confidentiality



Revision as of 15:09, 19 May 2018

Original Editor - Andrea Sturm

Top Contributors - Wendy Walker, Rachael Lowe, Kim Jackson, Amanda Ager, Jess Bell and Robin Tacchetti  

Introduction[edit | edit source]

The ability to effectively address ethical dilemmas - ethical reasoning - is an essential component of health care. The emphasis in ethical reasoning is on a sensible progression from the facts of the situation to a morally sound decision. To help us in this ethical reasoning process, an ethics “workup”[1] (this one or a similar version) may be used, and is appropriate for use by all health professionals at both organisation and individual level.

The Ethics Workup[1][edit | edit source]

Using the five principal steps of the ethics workup, health professionals holding a variety of philosophical and religious positions regarding ethics can share a basic framework for thinking about and discussing morally troubling cases.

What are the Facts[edit | edit source]

It is vitally important to clarify the facts of any situation in order to anchor the decision. These facts relate to the organisational, medical, and social circumstances of the case. For example, at the bedside both an estimate of prognosis and an understanding of the patient's wishes are relevant to an ethical decision about what is in the patient’s best interest.

Resource allocation may be ethically relevant at the organisational level, but should provide a subsidiary influence at the bedside.

5 Step Evaluation[1][edit | edit source]

Answering the following questions will establish the facts to consider:

  1. Who?
  2. What?
  3. Where?
  4. When?
  5. Why?

1. Who?[edit | edit source]

Establish the Persons involved and/or affected. Remember, this may include family members of the patient, for instance.

2. What?[edit | edit source]

Consider:

  • Diagnosis, prognosis, therapeutic options
  • Personal preferences, beliefs, values
  • Resources available
  • Organisational mission and policy

3. Where?[edit | edit source]

Medical setting

4. When?[edit | edit source]

Chronology of events, time constraints

5. Why?[edit | edit source]

Patient’s goals of care and treatment

Communication[edit | edit source]

Clear and effective communication about the facts is crucial. Physiotherapists may be instrumental in ensuring that the patient/family and other non-medical health professionals understand the medical facts while also making sure the health care team understands pertinent non-medical information about the patient and family. Administrators may be concerned for the welfare of the organisation and those it serves as well as that of an individual patient.

What is the Ethical Concern?[edit | edit source]

Identify the specific ethical issue in the case, and there may be more than one. Ethical claims may be competing, such as the welfare of one patient versus that of many when considering resource allocation. The issue may not be ethical at all, but rather a legal issue, a placement issue, or simple miscommunication about the clinical facts.

Some common ethical concerns in the clinical setting include:

  • The patient’s right to refuse or demand treatment
  • Questions of futility and withholding or withdrawing treatment
  • Appropriate surrogacy and substituted judgment
  • Organisational limitations of services
  • Policies and practices regarding privacy and confidentiality

References[edit | edit source]

  1. 1.0 1.1 1.2 Fleming D.A., Practical Ethical Reasoning, School of Medicine, University of Missouri Health, 31st March, 2017