Discharge management of the amputee

Original Editor - Barbara RAU

Top Contributors - Sheik Abdul Khadir, Admin, Kim Jackson, 127.0.0.1, Tony Lowe, Tarina van der Stockt, Simisola Ajeyalemi and Karen Wilson  

Introduction[edit | edit source]

Successful rehabilitation post-amputationrelies on the patient’s achievement of goals that were pre-determined by a multidisciplinary team (Multidisciplinary_management_of_the_amputee) and assessed through specific outcome measures (Outcome_measures_for_amputees). Successful rehabilitation is therefore intrinsicallylinked to effective discharge,which allows a patient to function optimally in his/her environment withthe necessary tools for proper management and self-care at home, inherent to the quality of life and empowerment of the patient. Because one can expect prosthetic usage to be altered or health status to change over time, timely re-evaluation of aforementioned outcome measures should be performed.[1] However, there is currently no clear evidence in the literature supporting the optimal process for patients’ discharge following an amputation, or suggesting determinants for the management of patients post-discharge to maintain their independence through regular follow-up.

Discharge Determinants: WHO ICF Model[edit | edit source]

The patients’ expected level of functional independence will not only be influenced by their physical and psychological presentation, but by their social environment as well.[2]

In fact, the WHO developed an international standard used to describe and measure health and function: the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health, commonly known as the ICF (International_Classification_of_Functioning,_Disability_and_Health_(ICF)). Instead of focusing on a patient’s diagnosis or disability, the ICF encourages health care professionals to adopt a holistic approach through a biopsychosocial model that considers all aspects present in someone’s life (health condition, environmental and personal factors) as interacting bodies that are determinant to the three level of functioning (body structure and functions, activity, and participation).

In accordance with the ICF model, Rommers et al. (1997) describe how “parameters such as physical condition, social factors, age and co-morbidity are influencing factors in determining the discharge destination” [3]. It is indeed by considering the patients’ activity and participation that the health care team can effectively direct patients towards the gradual resumption of roles within a community, whether it is practicing a sport or returning to work (International_Classification_of_Functioning,_Disability_and_Health_(ICF)).


Prior to discharge, occupational and physical therapists also need to conduct a detailed interview with the patients pertaining to environmental factors. For instance, positively reinforcing the importance of the patients’ social network reintegration is paramount to their recovery and should not be over looked by the rehabilitation team [4] Together with the patient and his family, the rehabilitation team also determines the need for modifications around their home, alterations ofactivities of daily living, or relocation to a residence that provides assistance. Indeed, functional outcomes in amputees has been shown to be improved by modification of their physical environment [5].
Personal factors such as coping mechanisms in the face of bereavement or overall behavioral patternsequally need to be taken into consideration to ensure the well-being of patients during and following the maintenance phase once they are at home.

Return to Work[edit | edit source]

Self-care and Management / Patient education
Lifestyle and Habits
Stump and Prosthetic Hygiene
When to contact the medical team
[edit | edit source]

 Psychological Support[edit | edit source]

BACPAR Recommendations

[edit | edit source]

References
[edit | edit source]

  1. Broomhead P, Clark K, Dawes D, Hale C, Lambert A, Quinlivan D, Randell T, Shepherd R, Withpetersen J. (2012) Evidence Based Clinical Guidelines for the Managements of Adults with Lower Limb Prostheses, 2nd Edition. Chartered Society of Physiotherapy: London.
  2. Hanley, M. A., Jensen, M. P., Ehde, D. M., Hoffman, A. J., Patterson, D. R., & Robinson, L. R. (2004). Psychosocial predictors of long-term adjustment to lower-limb amputation and phantom limb pain. Disability&Rehabilitation, 26(14-15), 882-893.
  3. Rommers, G. M., Vos, L. D. W., Groothoff, J. W., Schuiling, C. H., &Eisma, W. H. (1997). Epidemiology of lower limb amputees in the north of The Netherlands: aetiology, discharge destination and prosthetic use. Prosthetics and orthotics international, 21(2), 92-99.
  4. Deans, S. A., McFadyen, A. K., & Rowe, P. J. (2008). Physical activity and quality of life: A study of a lower-limb amputee population. Prosthetics and orthotics international, 32(2), 186-200.
  5. Collin, C., Wade, D. T., & Cochrane, G. M. (1992). Functional outcome of lower limb amputees with peripheral vascular disease. Clinical rehabilitation, 6(1), 13-21.