Critically Appraised Topics: Difference between revisions

No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 24: Line 24:
1. Developing a well-built question<br>2. Search for and select best evidence<br>3. Analyse the evidence - '''Write CAT'''<br>4. Apply the evidence to the clinical situation<br>5. Evaluating the application of the evidence - '''Revise CAT'''<br>6. Disseminating the findings&nbsp; - '''Share CAT'''<br>  
1. Developing a well-built question<br>2. Search for and select best evidence<br>3. Analyse the evidence - '''Write CAT'''<br>4. Apply the evidence to the clinical situation<br>5. Evaluating the application of the evidence - '''Revise CAT'''<br>6. Disseminating the findings&nbsp; - '''Share CAT'''<br>  


== How to Construct a CAT<br> ==
== How to Construct a CAT<br> ==


#Identify gaps in knowledge (“knowledge needs”) from client encounters
#Translate the problem into an answerable question
#Formulate a well-built question using the [[PICO Questions|PICO framework]]
#Search for the [[Find_the_best_available_evidence|best available evidence]]<br>
#Examine and critically appraise the evidence<br>
#Write the CAT<br>
#Share the CAT here on Physiopedia<br>


== Other CAT formats and approaches ==


#Identify gaps in knowledge (“knowledge needs”) from client encounters
There are other different purposes of producing CATs which include:
#Translate the problem into an answerable question
 
#Formulate a well-built question using the [[PICO Questions|PICO framework]]
*Answer explicit clinical question from real clinical situation.&nbsp; This is the essence of EBP.
#[[PICO Questions|<br>]]<br>
*Appraise a recently published article that is important; or summarize an article used to provide evidence as part of a guideline

Revision as of 18:53, 16 March 2011

What is a Critically Appraised Topic (CAT)
[edit | edit source]

A critically appraised topic (or CAT) is a short summary of evidence on a topic of interest, usually focussed around a clinical question. Defined as a brief “summary of a search and critical appraisal of the literature related to a focused clinical question, which should be kept in an easily accessible place so that it can be used to help make clinical decisions”[1].

A CAT is like a shorter and less rigorous version of a systematic review, summarising the best available research evidence on a topic. Usually more than one study is included in a CAT. When professionals summarise a single study, the outcome is a critically appraised paper (or CAP). CATs and CAPs are one way for busy clinicians to collate and share their appraisals.

Key parts of a CAT include:

  1. Purpose
  2. Reviewer
  3. Date of completion
  4. Well-built questions
  5. Search strategies and results
  6. Evidence retrieved
  7. Appraisal
  8. Conclusions

Why do we need CATs
[edit | edit source]

It is almost impossible for practitioners to keep up to date with all the new evidence for their field of clinical expertise.  Research shows that even seasoned health-care clinicians and practitioners encounter up to 5 “knowledge needs” for every in-patient, and about 2 “needs” for every three out-patients (Sauvé, 1995).  “Knowledge needs” raise questions about the best course of action.  Evidence-based decision making in clinical scenarios demands time-efficient, up-to-date evidence review.  Critically appraised summaries of the best evidence for common clinical or educational questions address these needs.  “Gold standard” would be a systematic review, but this takes too much time and effort and is not practicable for clinicians (Ziegler et al., 2001). 

CATs as part of the EBP process[edit | edit source]

1. Developing a well-built question
2. Search for and select best evidence
3. Analyse the evidence - Write CAT
4. Apply the evidence to the clinical situation
5. Evaluating the application of the evidence - Revise CAT
6. Disseminating the findings  - Share CAT

How to Construct a CAT
[edit | edit source]

  1. Identify gaps in knowledge (“knowledge needs”) from client encounters
  2. Translate the problem into an answerable question
  3. Formulate a well-built question using the PICO framework
  4. Search for the best available evidence
  5. Examine and critically appraise the evidence
  6. Write the CAT
  7. Share the CAT here on Physiopedia

Other CAT formats and approaches[edit | edit source]

There are other different purposes of producing CATs which include:

  • Answer explicit clinical question from real clinical situation.  This is the essence of EBP.
  • Appraise a recently published article that is important; or summarize an article used to provide evidence as part of a guideline
  1. Centre for Evidence Based Emergency Medicine, http://www.ebem.org/definitions.html#Critically%20appraised%20topic last accessed 21st March 2011