Crank Test: Difference between revisions

No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 2: Line 2:
This page is currently under construction as part of an EIM project. Please do not edit, but please come back in the near future to check out new information!!  
This page is currently under construction as part of an EIM project. Please do not edit, but please come back in the near future to check out new information!!  
</div> <div class="editorbox">
</div> <div class="editorbox">
'''Original Editor '''- Your name will be added here if you created the original content for this page.
'''Original Editor '''- [[User:Stacy S Stone|Stacy S Stone]]


'''Lead Editors''' - Your name will be added here if you are a lead editor on this page.&nbsp; [[Physiopedia:Editors|Read more.]]  
'''Lead Editors''' - Your name will be added here if you are a lead editor on this page.&nbsp; [[Physiopedia:Editors|Read more.]]  
</div>  
</div>  
== Purpose<br>  ==
== Purpose<br>  ==


Line 84: Line 83:
add any relevant resources here  
add any relevant resources here  


<br>


== Recent Related Research (from [http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/ Pubmed])  ==
== Recent Related Research (from [http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/ Pubmed])  ==

Revision as of 10:04, 2 July 2009

This page is currently under construction as part of an EIM project. Please do not edit, but please come back in the near future to check out new information!!

Original Editor - Stacy S Stone

Lead Editors - Your name will be added here if you are a lead editor on this page.  Read more.

Purpose
[edit | edit source]

To identify glenoid labral tears.

Technique
[edit | edit source]

Patient is upright with the arm elevated to 160° in the scapular plane. Joint load is applied along the axis of the humerus with one hand while the other hand performs humeral rotation. The test can be repeated in supine. A positive test is indicated during the manuver (usually during external rotation) if there is reproduction of symptoms with or without a click.

Evidence[edit | edit source]


First author
Sensitivity (95% CI)
Specificity (95% CI)
+LR (95% CI)
-LR (95% CI)
Accuracy (%)
Guanche 2003
0.4
0.73
1.481
0.821
Liu 1996
0.906 (0.750–0.980)
0.933 (0.779–0.992)
13.594 (3.547–52.099)
0.100 (0.034–0.296)
91.9
Mimori 1999
0.833 (0.516–0.979)
1.000 (0.292–1.000)
6.462 (0.477–87.549)
0.220 (0.068–0.711)
86.6
Myers 2005
0.346
0.7
44.4
Nakagawa 2005
0.58
0.72
66
Parentis 2006
0.087
0.826
Stetson and Templin 2002
0.462 (0.266–0.666)
0.564 (0.396–0.722)
1.059 (0.612–1.831)
0.955 (0.608–1.497)
33.8

[1]

Resources[edit | edit source]

add any relevant resources here


Recent Related Research (from Pubmed)[edit | edit source]

Failed to load RSS feed from http://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/erss.cgi?rss_guid=1hCS5QvDf5q4Rm14iSuEJ0K61qbixyiKrdRzr3oHo3AAvI_kH|charset=UTF-8|short|max=10: Error parsing XML for RSS

References[edit | edit source]

References will automatically be added here, see adding references tutorial.

  1. Munro W, Healy R. The validity and accuracy of clinical tests used to detect labral pathology of the shoulder-a systematic review. Manual Therapy 2009; 14(2):119-30.