CPR for Carpal Tunnel Syndrome: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
<div class="noeditbox"> | |||
This page is currently under construction as part of an EIM project. Please do not edit, but please come back in the near future to check out new information!! | |||
</div> | |||
<div class="editorbox"> | <div class="editorbox"> | ||
'''Original Editor '''- Your name will be added here if you created the original content for this page. | '''Original Editor '''- Your name will be added here if you created the original content for this page. | ||
'''Lead Editors''' - Your name will be added here if you are a lead editor on this page. [[Physiopedia:Editors|Read more.]] | '''Lead Editors''' - Your name will be added here if you are a lead editor on this page. [[Physiopedia:Editors|Read more.]] | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
== Purpose<br> == | == Purpose<br> == | ||
Clinical prediction rules (CPRs) combine historical and physical examination findings to help clinicians predict the probability of a particular diagnosis.<ref name="Childs">Childs JD, Cleland JA. Development and Application of Clinical Prediction Rules to Improve Clinical Decision Making in Physical Therapist Practice. Phys Ther. 2006; 122-131.</ref> In 2005, Wainner et al published a level IV CPR to aid clinicians in diagnosing carpal tunnel syndrome.<ref name="Wainner">Wainner R, Fritz J, Irrgang J, Delitto A, Allison S, Boninger M. Development of a Clinical Prediction Rule for the Diagnosis of Carpal Tunnel Syndrome. Arch Phys Med 2005; 86: 609-618.</ref> | Clinical prediction rules (CPRs) combine historical and physical examination findings to help clinicians predict the probability of a particular diagnosis.<ref name="Childs">Childs JD, Cleland JA. Development and Application of Clinical Prediction Rules to Improve Clinical Decision Making in Physical Therapist Practice. Phys Ther. 2006; 122-131.</ref> In 2005, Wainner et al published a level IV CPR to aid clinicians in diagnosing carpal tunnel syndrome.<ref name="Wainner">Wainner R, Fritz J, Irrgang J, Delitto A, Allison S, Boninger M. Development of a Clinical Prediction Rule for the Diagnosis of Carpal Tunnel Syndrome. Arch Phys Med 2005; 86: 609-618.</ref> | ||
== Clinical Prediction Rule Components <ref name="Wainner" /> == | == Clinical Prediction Rule Components <ref name="Wainner" /> == | ||
1. Shaking hands to relieve symptoms<span id="fck_dom_range_temp_1246070608046_19"></span> | 1. Shaking hands to relieve symptoms<span id="fck_dom_range_temp_1246070608046_19"></span> | ||
| Line 18: | Line 21: | ||
4. Diminished sensation in median sensory field 1 (thumb) | 4. Diminished sensation in median sensory field 1 (thumb) | ||
5. Age > 45 years old | 5. Age > 45 years old | ||
== Technique == | == Technique == | ||
| Line 26: | Line 29: | ||
<br>'''Median nerve sensation '''was measured on the pad of thumb with end of a straightened paper clip, and compared to sensation at the proximal thenar eminence. Sensory tests were grades as absent, reduced, normal or hyperesthestic | <br>'''Median nerve sensation '''was measured on the pad of thumb with end of a straightened paper clip, and compared to sensation at the proximal thenar eminence. Sensory tests were grades as absent, reduced, normal or hyperesthestic | ||
<br> | <br> | ||
'''Symptom Severity Scale''': The symptom severity scale was published in 1993 by Levine et al <ref name="Levine">Levine D, Simmons B, Koris M, Daltroy L, Hohl G, Fossel A, Katz J. A Self- Administered Questionnaire for the Assessment of Severity of Symptoms and Functional Status in Carpal Tunnel Syndrome. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1993; 75: 1585-92.</ref>. It is an 11 item questionnaire that examines the six critical domains for the evaluation of CTS: pain, paresthesia, numbness, weakness, nocturnal symptoms and overall functional status. Each question is scored from 1 (mildest symptoms) to 5 (most severe symptoms); therefore, a higher score indicates a more severe case of CTS. The SSS has been shown to have good reliability, validity and responsiveness. <ref name="Levine" /> | '''Symptom Severity Scale''': The symptom severity scale was published in 1993 by Levine et al <ref name="Levine">Levine D, Simmons B, Koris M, Daltroy L, Hohl G, Fossel A, Katz J. A Self- Administered Questionnaire for the Assessment of Severity of Symptoms and Functional Status in Carpal Tunnel Syndrome. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1993; 75: 1585-92.</ref>. It is an 11 item questionnaire that examines the six critical domains for the evaluation of CTS: pain, paresthesia, numbness, weakness, nocturnal symptoms and overall functional status. Each question is scored from 1 (mildest symptoms) to 5 (most severe symptoms); therefore, a higher score indicates a more severe case of CTS. The SSS has been shown to have good reliability, validity and responsiveness. <ref name="Levine" /> | ||
== Evidence == | == Evidence == | ||
{| | {| cellspacing="1" cellpadding="1" border="1" width="400" | ||
|+ Validity of CPR for diagnosis of CTS<ref name="Wainner" /> | |+ Validity of CPR for diagnosis of CTS<ref name="Wainner" /> | ||
|- | |- | ||
| Line 59: | Line 62: | ||
| .83 | | .83 | ||
|} | |} | ||
<div class="researchbox"></div> | <div class="researchbox"></div> | ||
<br> | <br> | ||
{| | {| cellspacing="1" cellpadding="1" border="1" width="400" | ||
|+ Validity of other common individual historical questions and physical exam findings<ref name="Wainner" /> | |+ Validity of other common individual historical questions and physical exam findings<ref name="Wainner" /> | ||
|- | |- | ||
| Line 75: | Line 78: | ||
| .40 | | .40 | ||
| | | | ||
1.3 | 1.3 | ||
| .58 | | .58 | ||
| Line 83: | Line 86: | ||
| .58 | | .58 | ||
| | | | ||
<br>.98 | <br>.98 | ||
| 1.0 | | 1.0 | ||
| Line 91: | Line 94: | ||
| .89 | | .89 | ||
| | | | ||
<br>1.7 | <br>1.7 | ||
| .91 | | .91 | ||
| Line 108: | Line 111: | ||
|} | |} | ||
<br> | <br> | ||
<br> | <br> | ||
<br> | <br> | ||
{| | {| cellspacing="1" cellpadding="1" border="1" width="400" | ||
|+ Interpretation of likelihood ratios<ref name="Jaeschke">Jaeschke R, Guyatt G, Sackett D. User's Guide to the Medical Literature III. How to use an article about a diagnostic test. B. What are the results and will they help me in caring for my patients? The Evidence-Based Medicine Working Group. JAMA 1994; 271:703-707.</ref> | |+ Interpretation of likelihood ratios<ref name="Jaeschke">Jaeschke R, Guyatt G, Sackett D. User's Guide to the Medical Literature III. How to use an article about a diagnostic test. B. What are the results and will they help me in caring for my patients? The Evidence-Based Medicine Working Group. JAMA 1994; 271:703-707.</ref> | ||
|- | |- | ||
| Line 120: | Line 123: | ||
Interpretation | Interpretation | ||
(shifts in probablitity) | (shifts in probablitity) | ||
| + LR | | + LR | ||
| Line 126: | Line 129: | ||
|- | |- | ||
| | | | ||
large shifts, often conclusive | large shifts, often conclusive | ||
| > 10 | | > 10 | ||
| Line 132: | Line 135: | ||
|- | |- | ||
| | | | ||
moderate shifts | moderate shifts | ||
| 5-10 | | 5-10 | ||
| Line 138: | Line 141: | ||
|- | |- | ||
| | | | ||
small shifts, sometimes important | small shifts, sometimes important | ||
| 2-5 | | 2-5 | ||
| Line 145: | Line 148: | ||
| small and rarely important shifts | | small and rarely important shifts | ||
| | | | ||
1-2 | 1-2 | ||
| 0.5-1 | | 0.5-1 | ||
|} | |} | ||
<br> | |||
<br> | |||
== Suggestions for Use in the Clinic == | == Suggestions for Use in the Clinic == | ||
Revision as of 09:48, 29 June 2009
This page is currently under construction as part of an EIM project. Please do not edit, but please come back in the near future to check out new information!!
Original Editor - Your name will be added here if you created the original content for this page.
Lead Editors - Your name will be added here if you are a lead editor on this page. Read more.
Purpose
[edit | edit source]
Clinical prediction rules (CPRs) combine historical and physical examination findings to help clinicians predict the probability of a particular diagnosis.[1] In 2005, Wainner et al published a level IV CPR to aid clinicians in diagnosing carpal tunnel syndrome.[2]
Clinical Prediction Rule Components [2][edit | edit source]
1. Shaking hands to relieve symptoms
2. Wrist ratio >.67
3. Symptom Severity Scale > 1.9
4. Diminished sensation in median sensory field 1 (thumb)
5. Age > 45 years old
Technique[edit | edit source]
Wrist ratio index, as described by Johnson et al,[3] is measured by using a pair of sliding calipers to measure the anteroposterior (AP) wrist width and the mediolateral (ML) wrist width at the distal wrist crease. Wrist ratio index is then calculated by dividing the AP wrist width by the ML wrist width in centimeters. Ratios greater than .70 were found to be a predisposing factor for carpal tunnel syndrome. [3]
Median nerve sensation was measured on the pad of thumb with end of a straightened paper clip, and compared to sensation at the proximal thenar eminence. Sensory tests were grades as absent, reduced, normal or hyperesthestic
Symptom Severity Scale: The symptom severity scale was published in 1993 by Levine et al [4]. It is an 11 item questionnaire that examines the six critical domains for the evaluation of CTS: pain, paresthesia, numbness, weakness, nocturnal symptoms and overall functional status. Each question is scored from 1 (mildest symptoms) to 5 (most severe symptoms); therefore, a higher score indicates a more severe case of CTS. The SSS has been shown to have good reliability, validity and responsiveness. [4]
Evidence[edit | edit source]
| Sensitivity | Specificity | + LR | - LR | |
| > 3 positive tests | .98 | .54 | 2.1 | .04 |
| > 4 positive tests | .77 | .83 | 4.6 | .28 |
| All 5 tests positive | .18 | .99 | 18.3 | .83 |
| Sensitivity | Specificity | + LR | - LR | |
| Phalen test | .77 | .40 |
1.3 |
.58 |
| Tinel Part A | .41 | .58 |
|
1.0 |
| MMT APB | .19 | .89 |
|
.91 |
| c/o symptoms waking at night | .73 | .31 | 1.1 | .86 |
| c/o fumbling or dropping objects with affected hand | .73 | .57 | 1.7 | .47 |
|
Interpretation (shifts in probablitity) |
+ LR | - LR |
|
large shifts, often conclusive |
> 10 | < 0.1 |
|
moderate shifts |
5-10 | 0.1-0.2 |
|
small shifts, sometimes important |
2-5 | 0.2-0.5 |
| small and rarely important shifts |
1-2 |
0.5-1 |
Suggestions for Use in the Clinic[edit | edit source]
Recent Related Research (from Pubmed)[edit | edit source]
Extension:RSS -- Error: Not a valid URL: Feed goes here!!|charset=UTF-8|short|max=10 </div>
References[edit | edit source]
References will automatically be added here, see adding references tutorial.
- ↑ Childs JD, Cleland JA. Development and Application of Clinical Prediction Rules to Improve Clinical Decision Making in Physical Therapist Practice. Phys Ther. 2006; 122-131.
- ↑ 2.0 2.1 2.2 2.3 Wainner R, Fritz J, Irrgang J, Delitto A, Allison S, Boninger M. Development of a Clinical Prediction Rule for the Diagnosis of Carpal Tunnel Syndrome. Arch Phys Med 2005; 86: 609-618.
- ↑ 3.0 3.1 Johnson E, Gatens T, Poindexter D, Bowers D. Wrist dimensions: correlation with median sensory latencies. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1993; 64:556-7.
- ↑ 4.0 4.1 Levine D, Simmons B, Koris M, Daltroy L, Hohl G, Fossel A, Katz J. A Self- Administered Questionnaire for the Assessment of Severity of Symptoms and Functional Status in Carpal Tunnel Syndrome. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1993; 75: 1585-92.
- ↑ Jaeschke R, Guyatt G, Sackett D. User's Guide to the Medical Literature III. How to use an article about a diagnostic test. B. What are the results and will they help me in caring for my patients? The Evidence-Based Medicine Working Group. JAMA 1994; 271:703-707.
