Bunnell-Littler Test: Difference between revisions
Jon DeVaul (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
<div class="editorbox"> | |||
'''Original Editor '''- Your name will be added here if you created the original content for this page. | |||
'''Lead Editors''' - Your name will be added here if you are a lead editor on this page. [[Physiopedia:Editors|Read more.]] | |||
</div> | |||
== Purpose<br> == | |||
add the purpose of this assessment technique here<br> | |||
== Technique<br> == | |||
Describe how to carry out this assessment technique here | |||
== Evidence == | |||
Provide the evidence for this technique here | |||
== Resources == | |||
add any relevant resources here | |||
< | == Recent Related Research (from [http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/ Pubmed]) == | ||
<div class="researchbox"> | |||
<rss>Feed goes here!!|charset=UTF-8|short|max=10</rss> | |||
</div> | |||
== References == | |||
| | References will automatically be added here, see [[Adding References|adding references tutorial]]. | ||
< | <references /> | ||
== Purpose<br> == | == Purpose<br> == | ||
| Line 16: | Line 34: | ||
This test evaluates the source of PIP flexion motion limitation by differentiating between intrinsic muscle or capsular tightness in the affected digit. A typical patient presentation may include pain located in the distal intermetacarpal space and with prolonged gripping or making a fist. Symptoms are most often seen in the ring and long finger.<br> | This test evaluates the source of PIP flexion motion limitation by differentiating between intrinsic muscle or capsular tightness in the affected digit. A typical patient presentation may include pain located in the distal intermetacarpal space and with prolonged gripping or making a fist. Symptoms are most often seen in the ring and long finger.<br> | ||
<br> | <br> | ||
== Technique<br> == | == Technique<br> == | ||
The MCP is held in an extended position and the therapist passively flexes the PIP making note of the available range. The test is then repeated with the MCP flexed. If no change in motion is detected between the two tests, then capsular restriction at the PIP joint is implicated. If the motion increases when the MCP is flexed, then lumbricale muscle tightness is implicated.<br><br> | The MCP is held in an extended position and the therapist passively flexes the PIP making note of the available range. The test is then repeated with the MCP flexed. If no change in motion is detected between the two tests, then capsular restriction at the PIP joint is implicated. If the motion increases when the MCP is flexed, then lumbricale muscle tightness is implicated.<br><br> | ||
== Evidence == | == Evidence == | ||
Revision as of 14:31, 5 December 2009
Original Editor - Your name will be added here if you created the original content for this page.
Lead Editors - Your name will be added here if you are a lead editor on this page. Read more.
Purpose
[edit | edit source]
add the purpose of this assessment technique here
Technique
[edit | edit source]
Describe how to carry out this assessment technique here
Evidence[edit | edit source]
Provide the evidence for this technique here
Resources[edit | edit source]
add any relevant resources here
Recent Related Research (from Pubmed)[edit | edit source]
Extension:RSS -- Error: Not a valid URL: Feed goes here!!|charset=UTF-8|short|max=10
References[edit | edit source]
References will automatically be added here, see adding references tutorial.
Purpose
[edit | edit source]
This test evaluates the source of PIP flexion motion limitation by differentiating between intrinsic muscle or capsular tightness in the affected digit. A typical patient presentation may include pain located in the distal intermetacarpal space and with prolonged gripping or making a fist. Symptoms are most often seen in the ring and long finger.
Technique
[edit | edit source]
The MCP is held in an extended position and the therapist passively flexes the PIP making note of the available range. The test is then repeated with the MCP flexed. If no change in motion is detected between the two tests, then capsular restriction at the PIP joint is implicated. If the motion increases when the MCP is flexed, then lumbricale muscle tightness is implicated.
Evidence[edit | edit source]
Provide the evidence for this technique here
Resources[edit | edit source]
add any relevant resources here
References
[edit | edit source]
| The content on or accessible through Physiopedia is for informational purposes only. Physiopedia is not a substitute for professional advice or expert medical services from a qualified healthcare provider. Read more. |
