Assessing Muscle Strength: Difference between revisions

(Links to PP pages)
No edit summary
Line 97: Line 97:
Read more: [[Muscle Fibre Types]], [[Muscle Cells (Myocyte)#Sliding Filament Model of Contraction|Sliding Filament Model of Contraction]], [[Muscle Cells (Myocyte)#The Muscle Contraction Process|The Muscle Contraction Process]]
Read more: [[Muscle Fibre Types]], [[Muscle Cells (Myocyte)#Sliding Filament Model of Contraction|Sliding Filament Model of Contraction]], [[Muscle Cells (Myocyte)#The Muscle Contraction Process|The Muscle Contraction Process]]
=== Cross Sectional Area of Muscle ===
=== Cross Sectional Area of Muscle ===
The greater the cross sectional area of the muscle, the greater the force it can produce. Cross sectional area is proportional to the force that is produces with force independent of fibre length. The only forces transmitted though the muscle attachments are those generated by the sarcomeres at the end of the muscle. In a pennate structure, more fibres can be packed in, so they tend to be stronger and have a greater cross sectional area.
The greater the cross sectional area of the muscle, the greater the force it can produce, but it is important to note that  Cross sectional area is proportional to the force that is produces with force independent of fibre length. The only forces transmitted though the muscle attachments are those generated by the sarcomeres at the end of the muscle. In a pennate structure, more fibres can be packed in, so they tend to be stronger and have a greater cross sectional area.


=== Neural Factors ===
=== Neural Factors ===

Revision as of 22:07, 10 July 2023

Introduction[edit | edit source]

Muscle strength is defined as the maximal force a muscle or muscle group can generate at a specified or determined velocity.[1] Essentially, it is the ability of skeletal muscle to develop force in order to provide stability and mobility within the musculoskeletal system, which is necessary for functional movement to occur.[2] The muscle strength assessment is integral to the objective examination as it provides valuable information on strength and neurological deficits.

Muscle strength decreases with age and many pathologies can reduce muscle strength and control.[2] For example, it can be impaired following injury, infection, major surgery or in many medical conditions including but not limited to stroke, cerebral palsy, muscular dystrophy, metabolic syndromes, spinal cord injury, motor neuron disease, multiple sclerosis, Parkinson's, COPD, heart failure, and arthritis. Muscle strength can be a predictor of mortality, hospital length of stay, and hospital readmission.

Factors Determining Muscle Strength[edit | edit source]

Strength depends on a combination of morphological and neural factors including:[3]

  • cross-sectional area of muscle
  • muscle architecture
  • stiffness of the musculotendinous structure
  • type of muscle contraction
  • motor unit recruitment, rate coding and motor unit synchronisation
  • neuromuscular inhibition
  • speed of contraction

Some of these factors will be discussed in more detail below.

Types of Muscle Contraction[edit | edit source]

A muscle contraction occurs when tension-generating sites within the muscle cells are activated. The type of contraction is defined by changes in the length of the muscle during contraction.

Isometric Contractions[edit | edit source]

Greek, isos: “equal” and metron: “measure”

Isometric contractions are a static contraction with variable / accommodating resistance that does not result in changes in muscle length.[4] Tension is generated in the muscle but the distance between the muscle attachments remains the same. In an isometric contraction, cross bridges form, disengage and reform. There is no movement and no external work is done by the muscle.

Isotonic Contractions[edit | edit source]

Greek, isos: “equal” and tonos: “straining”)

Figure.1 Types of Muscle Contractions [5]

In an isotonic contraction, tension remains the same, but the muscle's length changes. There are two types of isotonic contractions: concentric and eccentric contractions.

Concentric Contraction

  • During a concentric contraction, there is a shortening of the muscle,[6] so the origin and insertion of the muscle move closer together.
  • A muscle performs a concentric contraction when it lifts a load or weight that is less than the maximum tetanic tension it can generate.
  • The muscle shortens, movement occurs and external work is done.

Eccentric Contraction

  • During an eccentric contraction, the muscle lengthens as it gives in to an external force that is greater than the contractile force exerted by the muscle.[7][8]
  • In reality, the muscle does not lengthen. Instead, it returns from its shortened position to its normal length.
  • The muscle lengthens, movement occurs and external work is done.

Length of Muscle[edit | edit source]

Muscle length is an important factor in governing force and tension. The full range in which a muscle can work = the range between the position of maximal stretch to the position of maximal shortening. As shown in Table 1, full range is divided into three parts.[9]

Table 1. Three Parts of Muscle Length Range
Outer Range Inner Range Mid Range
  • muscle working in maximally stretched position[9]
  • moves between longest length and mid-point of range[9]
  • least overlap of actin and myosin[10]
  • fewer cross bridges formed
  • less tension produced
  • muscle working in maximally shortened position[9]
  • moves between the shortest length and mid-point of range[9]
  • actin and myosin overlap
  • decreased number of sites available for cross bridge formation[10]
  • less force generated
  • muscle working between mid-point of outer range and mid-point of inner range[9]
  • optimal overlap of actin and myosin
  • optimal number of sites for cross bridge formation
  • maximum tension generated[10]

Muscle Fibre Type[edit | edit source]

  • There are three types of muscle fibres.
    • These can be classified based on how fast the fibres contract relative to other fibres and how the fibres regenerate adenosine triphosphate (ATP) (i.e. the source of energy for muscles).
    • Muscle fibre type can also be influenced by training.
      • People who do well at endurance sports tend to have a higher number of slow-twitch fibres.[11]
      • People who are better at sprint events tend to have higher numbers of fast-twitch muscle fibres.[11]
Table 2. Muscle Fibre Types[12]
Type I / Slow Twitch / Slow Oxidative Type IIa / Fast Twitch / Oxidative-Glycolytic Type IIb / Fast Twitch /

Glycolytic

  • relative slow contraction
  • use aerobic respiration (oxygen and glucose) for ATP production
  • produce low power contractions over long periods and slow to fatigue
  • high aerobic capacity, efficient at working isometrically, useful in maintaining posture and joint stabilisation
  • fast contractions
  • primarily use aerobic respiration
  • respond quicker than Type I but fatigue more quickly because they may switch to anaerobic respiration (glycolysis)
  • fast contractions
  • primarily use anaerobic glycolysis
  • quickest response but fatigue rapidly and have a relatively slow recovery rate

Read more: Muscle Fibre Types, Sliding Filament Model of Contraction, The Muscle Contraction Process

Cross Sectional Area of Muscle[edit | edit source]

The greater the cross sectional area of the muscle, the greater the force it can produce, but it is important to note that Cross sectional area is proportional to the force that is produces with force independent of fibre length. The only forces transmitted though the muscle attachments are those generated by the sarcomeres at the end of the muscle. In a pennate structure, more fibres can be packed in, so they tend to be stronger and have a greater cross sectional area.

Neural Factors[edit | edit source]

Neural factors influence the tension-developing capacity of the muscle, which determines the extent to which a muscle is activated. Neural input influences the tension by two mechanisms: the recruitment of motor units and the modification of the firing frequency of motor units.[13] Each muscle fibre generates a force so small as to be impractical for even the most delicate movement. Therefore the system is designed such that a group of muscle fibres share common innervation from a single alpha motor neuron with the amount of force generated based on the number of motor units recruited and the firing frequency of the motor units.

Integrity of Connective Tissue[edit | edit source]

For a person to intentionally contract a muscle the brain must generate a signal that travels along a pathway from the brain, through nerve cells in the brain stem and spinal cord to the peripheral nerves and across the connection between nerve and muscle. Many factors can impact the integrity of connective tissues at any part of this pathway, which is evident in force production and overall muscle strength. Pain has been shown to impact the production of muscle force including a reduction in maximal voluntary contraction and endurance time during submaximal contractions.[14] There is also correlation between pain intensity and reduced muscle strength in individuals with chronic pain, with increased pain intensity resulting in decreased muscle strength and force production.[15] Similarly inflammation can impact on force production, with research suggesting higher levels of circulating inflammatory markers are significantly associated with lower skeletal muscle strength and mass.[16] Many diseases including neuromuscular diseases, cancer, chronic inflammatory diseases, and acute critical illness are associated with skeletal muscle atrophy, muscle weakness, and general muscle fatigue, which is associated with increased morbidity and mortality and decreased quality of life.[17]

Age[edit | edit source]

Aging effects all body organs and systems in the skeletal muscle. As we age our muscles undergo progressive changes, primarily involving loss of muscle mass and strength. Muscle mass decreases approximately 3–8% per decade after age of 30 and this rate of decline is even higher after age of 60. [18][19] The total number of muscle fibres reduces with age, beginning at about 25 years and progressing at an accelerated rate thereafter, with reduced muscle cross-sectional area and as a result reduced muscle power. [20] There is also a decrease in the number of functional motor units associated with enlargement of the cross sectional area of the remaining units in the aging motor unit. [21] Overall these changes in the muscle mass, muscle fibre and cross sectional area of the muscle during the aging process is important clinically as it reduces muscle strength.

Read more: Muscle Function: Effects of Ageing

Contraindications[edit | edit source]

Muscle strength assessment are typically contraindicated where muscle contraction or motion of the part of the body could disrupt the healing process or result in injury or deterioration of the condition. Some examples of conditions where muscle strength may be contraindicated are listed below.

  • Unhealed fracture
  • Dislocation or unstable Joint
  • Active range of motion (ROM) or resistance contraindicated (e.g. post-op protocols etc)
  • Pain limit participation
  • Severe inflammation
  • Severe osteoporosis
  • Haemophilia
  • Cognitive concerns and ability to complete test

Precautions[edit | edit source]

  • Respect pain
  • Patient comfort
  • Abdominal surgery or hernia
  • Bony ankylosis
  • Haematoma
  • Cardiovascular or pulmonary disease
  • Prolonged immobilisation
  • Extreme debility

Measuring Muscle Strength[edit | edit source]

Muscle strength testing is used to determine the capability of the muscle or muscle group to produce force, and is an integral part of the physical examination. It provides information that is useful in differential diagnosis, prognosis and management of neuromuscular and musculoskeletal disorders.[22] While there are many methods of assessing muscle strength, there are basically three key approaches described in the literature and used clinically: isokinetic, isotonic, and isometric testing. Below are some guidelines on how to choose the best method of muscle strength testing.[23]

Isotonic Testing[edit | edit source]

Isotonic strength testing involves the testing of strength using a constant external resistance, which typically involves the use of free weights or resistance machines[24] and uses testing techniques such as the one-repetition maximum (1-RM)[25]. This refers to the maximum weight a patient can lift against gravity through an entire range of motion. Testing for 1RM involves adjusting the weight with repeated lifting until the patient can lift it only once, ensuring sufficient rest between each attempt to avoid fatigue. This type of testing can be time consuming and tests gross strength of muscle groups rather than individual muscles.[26]

Isokinetic Testing[edit | edit source]

Isokinetic strength testing involves the measurement of muscle strength by providing resistance through the range of motion at a constant velocity using an isokinetic dynamometer that generate an isokinetic torque curve. Muscle strength is determined by measuring the highest point on the curve, which provides us with an objective and quantitative measurement of muscle strength. Isokinetic machines allow isolation of specific joints, ensuring targeted testing of particular muscle groups. In addition to this, it can also evaluate muscle strength across differing speeds, and ranges of motion and can be very useful for comparing the left to right side. Provided that testing protocols are followed, reliability of isokinetic testing is high, but can be cost prohibitive. Like isotonic testing, isokinetic testing tests gross strength of muscle groups rather than individual muscles.

Isometric Testing[edit | edit source]

Isometric testing of muscle strength involves having the muscle generate force against an immovable resistance so that muscle length remains the same throughout the test. The most commonly used methods for isometric muscle testing, include manual muscle testing (MMT) and handheld dynamometry (HHD), which are both inexpensive and highly portable with MMT requiring no equipment other than the examiner’s hands.

Manual Muscle Testing[edit | edit source]

Manual muscle testing helps to determine the extent and degree of muscular weakness resulting from disease, injury or disuse to provide a basis for planning therapeutic procedures. It is used to evaluate the function and strength of an individual muscle or muscle group, based on the effective performance of a movement in relation to the forces of gravity or manual resistance through the available range of motion.

There are a wide range of scales available for completing manual muscle testing including the Modified MRC Scale, Daniels and Worthinghmans Manual Muscle Testing Scale, Kendall Muscle Testing Scale. Note that some scales use tests based on actions (for example elbow flexion) rather than tests of individual muscles (for example biceps brachii). In these cases the grade will represent the performance of all muscles contributing to the specific action. In the technique videos for this course we will use the Medical Research Council Scale (Table 3).

Table 3. Medical Research Council Scale (Oxford Scale) [27]
Grade Description
0 No Contraction
1 Flickering Contraction
2 Full Range of Motion with Gravity Eliminated
3 Full Range of Motion Against Gravity
4 Full Range of Motion Against Gravity with Minimal Resistance
5 Full Range of Motion Against Gravity with Maximal Resistance

As per Daniels and Worthington's 'Muscle Testing: Techniques of Manual Examination and Performance Testing', there are two different methods for performing manual muscle testing[28]:

  1. Break Test in manual muscle testing, is when resistance is applied to the body part at the end of the available range of motion. It's called the break test because when a therapist provides resistance the objective for the patient is to not allow the therapist to "break" the muscle hold.
  2. Active Resistance Test in manual muscle testing is when resistance is applied to the body part through the available range of motion. This type of manual muscle testing requires skill and experience and is not the recommended practice.

Dynamometry[edit | edit source]

Dynamometry is a more precise and objective measurement of the force that a muscle can exert and can allow for comparison across extremities or as a measure of progress in strengthening during rehabilitation and typically uses the same positioning for manual muscle testing but provides us with more quantifiable data. [29]

  • More sensitive than manual muscle testing
  • Norms available

Selecting Measurement Tools[edit | edit source]

Some guidelines on how to choose the best method of muscle strength testing[2]:

  • Select the tool that is most appropriate for the patient's strength
  • Select age-appropriate tool/test
  • The selected tool/test should fit the testing environment
  • Select a testing method for which tools are available
  • Select the method that provides the most quantifiable data

Principles of Assessment[edit | edit source]

There are some overall guiding principles when assessing muscle strength. Typically with muscle strength assessment we are always comparing to the unaffected side. The unaffected limb active range of motion is assessed first where possible, which allows the examiner to establish the patient's willingness to move and get a baseline for normal movement for the joint being tested. This also shows the patient what to expect, resulting in increased patient confidence and reduced apprehension when the affected side is tested. Any movements that are painful should be completed last, which will also minimise the risk of overflow of painful symptoms to the next movement. [30][31]

  • Preparation:
    • Determine whether there are contraindications or precautions and what joints, muscles and motions need to be tested. Organise the testing sequence by body position to minimise changes in positioning.
  • Communication:
    • Briefly explain the manual muscle test assessment procedure to the patient. Explain and demonstrate the movement to be performed and/or passively move the patient’s limb through the test movement. Explain and demonstrate the examiner’s and  individual’s roles and confirm the individual’s understanding and willingness to participate.
  • Expose the Area
    • Explain and demonstrate anatomical landmarks and why they need to be exposed. Adequately expose the area and drape the patient as required.
  • Positioning:
    • Proper positioning of the patient during muscle testing is essential in ensuring that the appropriate muscle is being tested and in preventing substitution by other muscles.[2] The main idea of the muscle test is to attempt to isolate the action of a specific muscle so that synergism from other muscles is eliminated or at least reduced to a minimum. In order to achieve this, the body part that is acted on by the muscle is put into a precise start position. As a rule, this will typically be in the mid-range of the muscle, thus allowing it to produce maximum force during the test. If there is any variance to the patient's position from standard assessment position outlined in our technique videos, ensure to make a note of this in your documentation. For example if the elbow is unable to achieve full extension, record the starting angle before measuring the muscle strength of flexion. The following table provides information on the positioning of the patient for testing.
Table 4. Guide to Upper Limb Positioning for Manual Muscle Testing
Body Region Muscle Action Patient Position in Relation to Grade Being Tested
Grade 0 and 1 Grade 2 Grade 3, 4 and 5
Shoulder Extension Prone Side Lying Prone
Flexion Supine Side Lying Supine
Abduction Supine Supine Side Lying or Standing
Adduction Supine Supine Side Lying or Standing
External Rotation Prone Supine Sitting - Hips and Knees at 90°
Internal Rotation Supine Supine Sitting - Hips and Knees at 90°
Elbow Extension Prone Side Lying or Sitting Prone or Sitting
Flexion Supine Side Lying or Sitting Supine or Sitting
Supination Supine or Sitting Difficult to eliminate gravity in FROM Supine or Sitting

Grade 3 - Difficult to complete FROM against gravity

Pronation Supine or Sitting Difficult to eliminate gravity in FROM Supine or Sitting

Grade 3 - Difficult to complete FROM against gravity

Wrist Extension Supine or Sitting Supine or Sitting

Forearm in Mid Position

Supine or Sitting

Forearm Pronated

Flexion Supine or Sitting Supine or Sitting

Forearm in Mid Position

Supine or Sitting

Forearm Supinated

Ulnar Deviation Supine or Sitting Supine or Sitting

Forearm Pronated

Supine or Sitting

Forearm Pronated

Radial Deviation Supine or Sitting Supine or Sitting

Forearm Pronated

Supine or Sitting

Forearm in Mid Position

Table 5. Guide to Lower Limb Positioning for Manual Muscle Testing
Body Region Muscle Action Patient Position in Relation to Grade Being Tested
Grade 0 and 1 Grade 2 Grade 3, 4 and 5
Hip Extension Prone Side Lying Prone
Flexion Supine Side Lying Supine
Abduction Supine Supine Side Lying or Standing
Adduction Supine Supine Side Lying or Standing
External Rotation Prone Supine Sitting - Hips and Knees at 90°
Internal Rotation Supine Supine Sitting - Hips and Knees at 90°
Knee Extension Supine Side Lying Sitting
Flexion Prone Side Lying Prone or Standing
Ankle Plantarflexion Prone Side Lying Prone or Standing
Dorsiflexion Supine Side Lying Supine or Sitting
Eversion Supine Supine Side Lying
Inversion Supine Supine Side Lying
  • Stabilisation:
    • The patient’s body needs to be placed in a stable position with the joint acted on by the muscle firmly fixed in place. This stabilisation comes initially from the effect of gravity and the weight of the patient on the treatment table or chair. Hand placement of the rehabilitation professionals on the limb to be assessed offers additional stabilisation of the proximal joints while the resistance is placed distally. Substitute movements at other joints may occur without adequate stabilisation, which can affect results. To increase accuracy therapists should know and recognise the possible substitute movements at each joint they are assessing.[32]
  • Application of Resistance:
    • In manual muscle testing, external force (resistance) is applied at the end of the range in one-joint muscles to allow for consistency of procedure. Two-joint muscles are typically tested in mid-range where length-tension is more favorable. Ideally, all muscles and muscle groups should be tested at optimal length-tension, but there are many occasions in manual muscle testing where the therapist is not able to distinguish between Grade 5 and 4 without putting the patient at a mechanical disadvantage. The point on an extremity, or part, where the therapist should apply resistance is near the distal end of the segment to which the muscle attaches.
  • Application of Grades:
    • Always start with testing in a position against gravity (Grade 3 in MRC Scale) to determine if the patient can move through the full range of motion against gravity ensuring to isolate muscle or muscle group to be tested. If the patient cannot move through any part of the range of motion against gravity, re-position the patient so that the resistance of gravity is eliminated for the test movement (i.e., the patient performs the movement in the horizontal plane). In this case, it may be necessary to support the weight of the limb on a relatively friction-free surface or manually.[2]
  • Application of Resistance:
    • Ensure to apply resistance slowly and gradually at the distal end of the limb with pressure opposite the line of pull of the muscle to be tested. Typically a lumbrical grip is most comfortable for the patient.
  • Documentation:
    • Documentation of manual muscle testing should list the muscle being tested, muscle grade allocated, symptoms experienced that may have impacted on strength and any changes needed to positioning to complete the test. e.g. right quadriceps 4/5 with pain performed in supine

Clinical Significance[edit | edit source]

Muscle strength testing can help be utilised to determine if there is a loss in muscle strength. Careful and consistent technique is important to ensure valid and reproducible results. Understanding the factors that may impact on muscle strength are also important in order to clinically reason why the person is experiencing loss of strength. Manual muscle testing with the Oxford Scale is the most commonly used grading scale, which is quick to complete and does not require special equipment, and while it is a subjective measure it demonstrates reasonable inter-rater reliability. More precise methods of measurement, such as dynamometry, are less subjective and provide a quantifiable measurement that can be tracked over time, but can be more time consuming to complete and require access to more expensive equipment.

Summary[edit | edit source]

Consistency in techniques is important for valid and reliable results. Having a good understanding of the factors that influence muscle strength will enhance your clinical reasoning skills. Manual muscle testing is quick to complete, does not require special equipment and exhibits reasonable inter-rater reliability. However, it is a clinical skill that needs to be practised on a variety of patients to acquire the necessary skills and experience.

References [edit | edit source]

  1. Knuttgen HG, Kraemer WJ. Terminology and measurement. Journal of applied sport science research. 1987;1(1):1-0.
  2. 2.0 2.1 2.2 2.3 2.4 Berryman Reece, N. Muscle and Sensory Testing. Fourth Edition. St Louis, Missouri. Elsevier. 2021
  3. Suchomel TJ, Nimphius S, Bellon CR, Stone MH. The importance of muscular strength: training considerations. Sports medicine. 2018 Apr;48:765-85..
  4. Rivera-Brown AM, Frontera MD. Principles of exercise physiology: Responses to acute exercise and long-term adaptations to training. PM&R. 2012; 4: 797-804.
  5. OpenStax. Anatomy and Physiology Chapter. 10.4 Nervous System Control of Muscle Tension. Available from: https://openstax.org/books/anatomy-and-physiology/pages/10-4-nervous-system-control-of-muscle-tension#fig-ch10_04_01(accessed 23 March 2023).
  6. Yoshida R, Kasahara K, Murakami Y, Sato S, Nosaka K, Nakamura M. Less fatiguability in eccentric than concentric repetitive maximal muscle contractions. European Journal of Applied Physiology. 2023 Mar 19:1-3.
  7. Tomalka A. Eccentric muscle contractions: from single muscle fibre to whole muscle mechanics. Pflügers Archiv-European Journal of Physiology. 2023 Apr;475(4):421-35.
  8. Douglas J, Pearson S, Ross A, McGuigan M. Eccentric exercise: physiological characteristics and acute responses. Sports Medicine. 2017 Apr;47:663-75.
  9. 9.0 9.1 9.2 9.3 9.4 9.5 Clarkson HM. Musculoskeletal assessment: joint range of motion and manual muscle strength. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2013
  10. 10.0 10.1 10.2 Nishikawa KC, Monroy JA, Tahir U. Muscle function from organisms to molecules. Integrative and comparative biology. 2018 Aug 1;58(2):194-206.
  11. 11.0 11.1 Plotkin DL, Roberts MD, Haun CT, Schoenfeld BJ. Muscle fiber type transitions with exercise training: Shifting perspectives. Sports. 2021 Sep 10;9(9):127.
  12. Biga LM, Bronson S, Dawson S, Harwell A, Hopkins R, Kaufmann J, LeMaster M, Matern P, Morrison-Graham K, Oja K, Quick D, Runyeon J. Anatomy and Physiology. Openstax. Available from https://open.oregonstate.education/aandp/chapter/10-5-types-of-muscle-fibers/
  13. Bohannon RW. Contribution of neural and muscular factors to the short duration tension-developing capacity of skeletal muscle. Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy. 1983 Nov 1;5(3):139-47.
  14. Graven-Nielsen T, Arendt-Nielsen L. Impact of clinical and experimental pain on muscle strength and activity. Current rheumatology reports. 2008 Dec;10(6):475-81.
  15. Van Wilgen CP, Akkerman L, Wieringa J, Dijkstra PU. Muscle strength in patients with chronic pain. Clinical rehabilitation. 2003 Dec;17(8):885-9.
  16. Tuttle CS, Thang LA, Maier AB. Markers of inflammation and their association with muscle strength and mass: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Ageing research reviews. 2020 Dec 1;64:101185.
  17. Powers SK, Lynch GS, Murphy KT, Reid MB, Zijdewind I. Disease-induced skeletal muscle atrophy and fatigue. Medicine and science in sports and exercise. 2016 Nov;48(11):2307.
  18. Melton LJ. Khosla S, Crowson CS, O'Connor MK, O'Fallon WM, and Riggs BL. Epidemiology of sarcopenia. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2000;48:625-30.
  19. Volpi E, Nazemi R, Fujita S. Muscle tissue changes with aging. Current opinion in clinical nutrition and metabolic care. 2004 Jul;7(4):405.
  20. Henwood TR, Riek S, Taaffe DR. Strength versus muscle power-specific resistance training in community-dwelling older adults. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2008; 63(1):83-91.
  21. Bunn JA. Aging and the Motor Unit. J Sport Medic Doping Studie. 2012; S1:e001. doi:10.4172/2161-0673.S1-e001
  22. Kendall FP, Kendall McCreary E, Geise Provance P, McIntyre Rodgers M and Romani WA. Muscles Testing and Function with Posture and Pain - Fifth Edition. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams and Wilkins, 2005.
  23. Naqvi U. Muscle strength grading. InStatpearls [Internet] 2019 May 29. StatPearls Publishing. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK436008/ (last accessed 7.1.20)
  24. Brown LE, Weir JP. ASEP procedures recommendation, I: assess- ment of muscular strength and power. J Exerc Phys. 2001;4:1-21.
  25. Kraemer WJ, Fry AC. Strength Testing: Development and Evaluation of Methodology. Physiological Assessment of Human Fitness. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics; 1995:115-138.
  26. Hurley BF. Age, gender, and muscular strength. J Gerontol Ser A. 1995;50A:41-44.
  27. Naqvi U. Muscle strength grading. InStatPearls [Internet] 2021 Sep 2. StatPearls Publishing.
  28. Avers, D. Brown, M. Daniels and Worthingham's Muscle Testing: Techniques of Manual Examination and Performance Testing. 10th Edition. St Louis, Missouri. Elsevier. 2019
  29. Sole G. Physical Therapy of the Shoulder. New Zealand Journal of Physiotherapy. 2004 Jul 1;32(2):87-8.
  30. Reese NB, Bandy WD. Joint Range of Motion and Muscle Length Testing-E-book. Elsevier Health Sciences; 2016 Mar 31.
  31. Magee D. Orthopaedic Physical Assessment WB Saunders. pg. 2002;478:483-631.
  32. Clarkson HM. Musculoskeletal assessment: joint motion and muscle testing. 2013.