Coma Recovery Scale (Revised)

Original Editor - Your name will be added here if you created the original content for this page.

Top Contributors - Wendy Walker, Kim Jackson, Naomi O'Reilly, Simisola Ajeyalemi, WikiSysop, Lucinda hampton and Olajumoke Ogunleye  

Objective
[edit | edit source]

The Coma Recovery Scale [CRS-R] , also known as the JFK Coma Recovery Scale - Revised, is used to assess patients with a disorder of consciousness, commonly coma[1].

It may be used to differentiate between vegetative state (VS) and minimally conscious state (MCS)[2]. It can also be used to monitor emergence from minimally conscious state (EMCS or MCS+)[2].

Intended Population
[edit | edit source]

Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI)

Stroke (CVA)

Brain Tumour

Method of Use[edit | edit source]

The CRS consists of 23 items, grouped into 6 subscales:

  1. Auditory
  2. Visual
  3. Motor
  4. Oromotor
  5. Communication
  6. Arousal

The lowest score on each subscale represents reflexive activity; the highest respresents behaviours mediated by cognitive input.

The total score ranges between 0 (worst) and 23 (best).

Equipment Required[edit | edit source]

  • Instruction sheet
  • Scoring sheet
  • 2 common functional objects (often a cup and a hairbrush or comb)
  • An object which produces a loud noise
  • Brightly coloured object
  • ADL items, eg. toothbrush, 'phone
  • Hand-held mirror
  • Baseball sized ball
  • Pencil
  • Tongue depressor

Available in several languages[edit | edit source]

As well as the original English version, there are French, German, Italian, Spanish, Dutch and Norwegian translations available.

Reference
[edit | edit source]

Giacino,Kalmar and Whyte [1] studied 80 patients with severe acquired brain injury. These individuals were aditted to an inpatient Coma Intervention Programme with a diagnosis of either vegetative state (VS) or minimally conscious state (MCS). They compared the CRS-R to the Disability Rating Scale (DRS), and found that the total scores showed "significant correlation" between the 2 scales, which indicates acceptable concurrent validity.

In addition, the CRS-R was able to distinguish 10 patients in an MCS who were scored as in VS by the DRS.

Evidence[edit | edit source]

Reliability[edit | edit source]

Test-retest Reliability[edit | edit source]

Disorder of Consciousness Presentation - TBI (Traumatic Brain Injury), CVA (Stroke), hypoxi-ischaemic Brain injury and Tumour:

(Giacino et al, 2004[1])

n=20; mean age = 36.7 years (ranging from 17 to 57 years); mean time post injury = 57.15 days (range 22 to 169 days).

  • Excellent test-retest reliability (Spearman rho = .94)

Inter/Intrarater Reliability[edit | edit source]

Disorders of Consciousness Presentation (variety of neurological conditions, including TBI (Traumatic Brain Injury):

Schnakers et al, 2008[2]

n=77; age range 19-86 years; 43 patients 1-27 days post injury, 34 27 days to 24 years post injury.

  • Excellent reliability for total score (k=.80_
  • Excellent reliability for subscales:

Auditory k=.82; Visual k=.85; Motor k=.93; Oromotor k=.92; Communication k=.98; Arousal k=.74.

Validity[edit | edit source]

This scale shows excellent concurrent validity as it correlates significantly with total scores on the orginal CRS and the DRS[1]:

  • Concurrent validity with CRS: Spearman rho = .97

In addition, in the original study by Giacino, Kalmar & Whyte[1], which had 80 inpatients with severe ABI, the CRS-R was able to distinguish 10 patients in an MCS who were misclassified as being in a VS by the DRS.

Responsiveness[edit | edit source]

Miscellaneous
[edit | edit source]

The Center for Outcome Measurement in Brain Injury {COMBI) has a useful page on the CRS-R:

Giacino, J & Kalmar, K. (2006). Coma Recovery Scale-Revised. The Center for Outcome Measurement in Brain Injury. http://www.tbims.org/combi/crs ( accessed March 13, 2016 ).

Links[edit | edit source]

A pdf of the CRS-R Administration and Scoring Guidelines:  

Recent Related Research (from Pubmed)[edit | edit source]

Extension:RSS -- Error: Not a valid URL: Feed goes here!!|charset=UTF-8|short|max=10

References[edit | edit source]

References will automatically be added here, see adding references tutorial.

  1. 1.0 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4 Giacino, J. T., K. Kalmar and J. Whyte (2004). "The JFK Coma Recovery Scale-Revised: measurement characteristics and diagnostic utility." Arch Phys Med Rehabil Dec 2004: 2020-9
  2. 2.0 2.1 2.2 Diagnostic accuracy of the vegetative and minimally conscious state: Clinical consensus versus standardized neurobehavioral assessmentfckLRSchnakers C, Vanhaudenhuyse A, Giacino J, et al. "Diagnostic accuracy of the vegetative and minimally conscious state: Clinical consensus versus standardized neurobehavioral assessment". BMC Neurol. 2009; 9:35.