Burns Scar Index (Vancouver Scar Scale): Difference between revisions
Chloe Waller (talk | contribs) (Added introduction) |
Chloe Waller (talk | contribs) (Added intended population and method of use) |
||
Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
'''Top Contributors''' - {{Special:Contributors/{{FULLPAGENAME}}}} | '''Top Contributors''' - {{Special:Contributors/{{FULLPAGENAME}}}} | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
== | == Introduction == | ||
Developed in 1990 by Sullivan et al<ref>Sullivan, T et al. [https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/2373734/ Rating the burn scar]. The Journal of burn care & rehabilitation. 1990;11: 256-60. </ref>, the Vancouver Scar Scale was the first widely used assessment to record burns scars using a semi-quantitative approach<ref>Park JW, Koh YG, Shin SH, Choi Y, Kim W, Yoo HH, et al. [https://www.jkslms.or.kr/journal/view.html?uid=263&vmd=Full Review of Scar Assessment Scales.] Medical Lasers. 2022;11:1-7 </ref>, in order to measure change in scar appearance during healing and treatment<ref>Baryza, M J, and G A Baryza. [https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/8537427/ The Vancouver Scar Scale: an administration tool and its interrater reliability.] The Journal of burn care & rehabilitation. 1995; 16: 535-8. </ref>. | Developed in 1990 by Sullivan et al<ref>Sullivan, T et al. [https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/2373734/ Rating the burn scar]. The Journal of burn care & rehabilitation. 1990;11: 256-60. </ref>, the Vancouver Scar Scale was the first widely used assessment to record burns scars using a semi-quantitative approach<ref>Park JW, Koh YG, Shin SH, Choi Y, Kim W, Yoo HH, et al. [https://www.jkslms.or.kr/journal/view.html?uid=263&vmd=Full Review of Scar Assessment Scales.] Medical Lasers. 2022;11:1-7 </ref>, in order to measure change in scar appearance during healing and treatment<ref name=":0">Baryza, M J, and G A Baryza. [https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/8537427/ The Vancouver Scar Scale: an administration tool and its interrater reliability.] The Journal of burn care & rehabilitation. 1995; 16: 535-8. </ref>. | ||
== Intended Population<br> == | == Intended Population<br> == | ||
The Vancouver Scar Scale is for use with patients with scarring from burn injuries<ref>Thompson CM, Sood RF, Honari S, Carrougher GJ, Gibran NS. [https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4644737/#!po=83.3333 What score on the Vancouver Scar Scale constitutes a hypertrophic scar? Results from a survey of North American burn-care providers]. Burns. 2015; 41: 1442-1448</ref>. The VSS is used in both clinical practice and research<ref name=":0" />. | |||
== Method of Use == | == Method of Use == | ||
Four characteristics of the scar are assessed. These are: vascularity, height, pliability, and pigmentation<ref>Fearmonti R., Bond J., Erdmann D., & Levinson H. [https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2890387/#:~:text=of%20daily%20living.-,Vancouver%20Scar%20Scale%20(VSS),recognized%20burn%20scar%20assessment%20method.&text=It%20assesses%204%20variables%3A%20vascularity,in%20to%20the%20overall%20score. A review of scar scales and scar measuring devices]. Eplasty. 2010: 10; 43</ref>. Each characteristic is given a score, which are added together to give an overall score between 0 and 13<ref>Nguyen T, Feldstein S, Shumaker P, Krakowski A. [https://scmsjournal.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/01/SCMS-Vol-34-no-1-Review-of-scar-assessment-scales.pdf A review of scar assessment scales]. Seminars in Cutaneous Medicine and Surgery. 2015; 34.</ref>. | |||
== Evidence == | |||
== Evidence | |||
=== Reliability === | === Reliability === |
Revision as of 07:13, 21 May 2022
Original Editor - User Name
Top Contributors - Chloe Waller, Kim Jackson and Vidya Acharya
Introduction[edit | edit source]
Developed in 1990 by Sullivan et al[1], the Vancouver Scar Scale was the first widely used assessment to record burns scars using a semi-quantitative approach[2], in order to measure change in scar appearance during healing and treatment[3].
Intended Population
[edit | edit source]
The Vancouver Scar Scale is for use with patients with scarring from burn injuries[4]. The VSS is used in both clinical practice and research[3].
Method of Use[edit | edit source]
Four characteristics of the scar are assessed. These are: vascularity, height, pliability, and pigmentation[5]. Each characteristic is given a score, which are added together to give an overall score between 0 and 13[6].
Evidence[edit | edit source]
Reliability[edit | edit source]
Validity[edit | edit source]
Responsiveness[edit | edit source]
Miscellaneous
[edit | edit source]
Links[edit | edit source]
References[edit | edit source]
- ↑ Sullivan, T et al. Rating the burn scar. The Journal of burn care & rehabilitation. 1990;11: 256-60.
- ↑ Park JW, Koh YG, Shin SH, Choi Y, Kim W, Yoo HH, et al. Review of Scar Assessment Scales. Medical Lasers. 2022;11:1-7
- ↑ 3.0 3.1 Baryza, M J, and G A Baryza. The Vancouver Scar Scale: an administration tool and its interrater reliability. The Journal of burn care & rehabilitation. 1995; 16: 535-8.
- ↑ Thompson CM, Sood RF, Honari S, Carrougher GJ, Gibran NS. What score on the Vancouver Scar Scale constitutes a hypertrophic scar? Results from a survey of North American burn-care providers. Burns. 2015; 41: 1442-1448
- ↑ Fearmonti R., Bond J., Erdmann D., & Levinson H. A review of scar scales and scar measuring devices. Eplasty. 2010: 10; 43
- ↑ Nguyen T, Feldstein S, Shumaker P, Krakowski A. A review of scar assessment scales. Seminars in Cutaneous Medicine and Surgery. 2015; 34.