The Biomechanics of Pregnancy: Difference between revisions

No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 15: Line 15:


=== Biomechanical Considerations ===
=== Biomechanical Considerations ===
During pregnancy, a number of biomechanical and hormonal changes occur that can alter spinal curvature, balance, and gait patterns by affecting key areas of the human body. This can greatly impact quality of life (QOL) by increasing back pain and the risk of falls.<ref>Conder R, Zamani R, Akrami M. T[https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33467386/ he Biomechanics of Pregnancy: A Systematic Review.] Journal of Functional Morphology and Kinesiology [Internet]. 2019 Dec 2 [cited 2021 Nov 25];4(4):72.</ref>  
During pregnancy, a number of biomechanical and hormonal changes occur that can alter spinal curvature, balance, and gait patterns by affecting key areas of the human body. This can greatly impact quality of life (QOL) by increasing back pain and the risk of falls.<ref name=":5">Conder R, Zamani R, Akrami M. T[https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33467386/ he Biomechanics of Pregnancy: A Systematic Review.] Journal of Functional Morphology and Kinesiology [Internet]. 2019 Dec 2 [cited 2021 Nov 25];4(4):72.</ref>  


The overall postural effect of pregnancy by the final month is as follows:<ref name=":0" /><ref>Fligg DB. [https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2484306/pdf/jcca00071-0035.pdf Biomechanical and treatment considerations for the pregnant patient.] The Journal of the Canadian Chiropractic Association [Internet]. 1986 [cited 2021 Nov 25];30(3):145–7.</ref><ref>Yoo H, Shin D, Song C. [https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25642091/ Changes in the spinal curvature, degree of pain, balance ability, and gait ability according to pregnancy period in pregnant and nonpregnant women.] Journal of Physical Therapy Science [Internet]. 2015 [cited 2021 Nov 25];27(1):279–84.</ref><ref>Petrocco-Napuli K. [http://www.footlevelerseducation.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/02/webinar_3.08_petrocco_pregnancy_induced_foot_pain.pdf Pregnancy and the Impact on the Lower Extremity] [Internet]. [cited 2021 Nov 21].</ref><ref>Franklin ME, Conner-Kerr T. [https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/9742469/ An Analysis of Posture and Back Pain in the First and Third Trimesters of Pregnancy.] Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy [Internet]. 1998 Sep [cited 2021 Nov 25];28(3):133–8.</ref>
The overall postural effect of pregnancy by the final month is as follows:<ref name=":0" /><ref>Fligg DB. [https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2484306/pdf/jcca00071-0035.pdf Biomechanical and treatment considerations for the pregnant patient.] The Journal of the Canadian Chiropractic Association [Internet]. 1986 [cited 2021 Nov 25];30(3):145–7.</ref><ref>Yoo H, Shin D, Song C. [https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25642091/ Changes in the spinal curvature, degree of pain, balance ability, and gait ability according to pregnancy period in pregnant and nonpregnant women.] Journal of Physical Therapy Science [Internet]. 2015 [cited 2021 Nov 25];27(1):279–84.</ref><ref>Petrocco-Napuli K. [http://www.footlevelerseducation.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/02/webinar_3.08_petrocco_pregnancy_induced_foot_pain.pdf Pregnancy and the Impact on the Lower Extremity] [Internet]. [cited 2021 Nov 21].</ref><ref>Franklin ME, Conner-Kerr T. [https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/9742469/ An Analysis of Posture and Back Pain in the First and Third Trimesters of Pregnancy.] Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy [Internet]. 1998 Sep [cited 2021 Nov 25];28(3):133–8.</ref><ref>Gilleard WL, Crosbie J, Smith R. [https://www.archives-pmr.org/action/showPdf?pii=S0003-9993%2802%2900596-8 Static trunk posture in sitting and standing during pregnancy and early postpartum.] Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation [Internet]. 2002 Dec [cited 2021 Nov 27];83(12):1739–44.</ref>


* Anterior tilt of pelvis with hyperextended knees
* Anterior tilt of pelvis with hyperextended knees
Line 29: Line 29:




The video below demonstrates the waddling gait in pregnancy{{#ev:youtube|mo-CrtgnkrA}}
The video below demonstrates how posture changes as the fetus grows.{{#ev:youtube|mo-CrtgnkrA}}


==== Changes in the Spine ====
==== Changes in the Spine ====
Line 59: Line 59:
===== '''Gait Cycle''' =====
===== '''Gait Cycle''' =====
A significant decrease in the length of the gait cycle is observed in pregnant women. There is an increase in double support time compared to post-partum and nulliparous women. These are fine adjustments that minimize the time on one leg to reduce muscle solicitation. Thus, pregnant women exaggerate transition phases in order to increase the security of gait.
A significant decrease in the length of the gait cycle is observed in pregnant women. There is an increase in double support time compared to post-partum and nulliparous women. These are fine adjustments that minimize the time on one leg to reduce muscle solicitation. Thus, pregnant women exaggerate transition phases in order to increase the security of gait.
Table below


{| class="wikitable"
{| class="wikitable"
Line 65: Line 67:
|-
|-
|Stride Length
|Stride Length
|decreases
|decreases as pregnancy progresses<ref name=":5" /><ref name=":6">Branco M, Santos-Rocha R, Aguiar L, Vieira F, Veloso A. [https://downloads.hindawi.com/journals/jp/2013/718095.pdf Kinematic Analysis of Gait in the Second and Third Trimesters of Pregnancy.] Journal of Pregnancy [Internet]. 2013 [cited 2021 Nov 27];2013:1–9. </ref><ref name=":7">Gilleard WL. [https://bmcpregnancychildbirth.biomedcentral.com/track/pdf/10.1186/1471-2393-13-71.pdf Trunk motion and gait characteristics of pregnant women when walking: report of a longitudinal study with a control group.] BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth [Internet]. 2013 Mar 20 [cited 2021 Nov 27];13(1). </ref>
|-
|-
|Stride Width
|Stride Width
|unchange
|remains unchanged<ref name=":6" />
|-
|-
|Step  Length
|Step  Length
|Decreases
|Decreases<ref name=":8">Błaszczyk JW, Opala-Berdzik A, Plewa M. [https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S096663621500884X?via%3Dihub Adaptive changes in spatiotemporal gait characteristics in women during pregnancy.] Gait & Posture [Internet]. 2016 Jan [cited 2021 Nov 27];43:160–4. </ref>
|-
|-
|Step Width
|Step Width
|Increases
|Increases as the pregnancy progresses<ref name=":7" />
|-
|-
|Single  Support Time
|Single  Support Time
|Decreases
|Decreases<ref name=":8" />
|-
|-
|Double  Support Time
|Double  Support Time
|Increases
|Increases between trimesters<ref name=":6" /><ref name=":8" />
|-
|-
|Base of  Support
|Base of  Support
Line 86: Line 88:
|-
|-
|Ground  Reaction Force
|Ground  Reaction Force
|Decrease in late pregnancy.  
|Decrease in late pregnancy.<ref name=":8" /><ref>Gimunova M, Kasović M, Zvonar M, Damir Knjaz. [https://www.researchgate.net/publication/290456738_Analysis_of_ground_reaction_force_in_gait_during_different_phases_of_pregnancy Analysis of ground reaction force in gait during different phases of pregnancy] [Internet]. ResearchGate. unknown; 2015 [cited 2021 Nov 27]. </ref>
|}
|}


{| class="wikitable"
{| class="wikitable"
| colspan="2" |                                                       '''Joint Kinematic Parameters'''
| colspan="2" |'''Joint Kinematic Parameters'''
|-
|-
| colspan="2" |'''Sagittal Plane'''
| colspan="2" |'''Sagittal Plane'''
Line 98: Line 100:
|-
|-
|Hip
|Hip
|Increase flexion during stance phase
|Increase flexion during stance phase<ref>Catena RD, Bailey JP, Campbell N, Stewart BC, Marion SJ. [https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0966636220301752?via%3Dihub Correlations between joint kinematics and dynamic balance control during gait in pregnancy.] Gait & Posture [Internet]. 2020 Jul [cited 2021 Nov 27];80:106–12. </ref>
|-
|-
|Knee
|Knee
Line 111: Line 113:
|Increase in pelvic separation width and  reduction in the amplitude of the unilateral elevation of the pelvis.
|Increase in pelvic separation width and  reduction in the amplitude of the unilateral elevation of the pelvis.
|-
|-
|Hip  
|Hip
|Increase in abduction.
|Increase in abduction.
|}
|}
Line 138: Line 140:


{{#ev:youtube|NpgUh5ACzW4}}
{{#ev:youtube|NpgUh5ACzW4}}
=== Sit-to-Stand during Pregnancy ===
Rising to stand from a chair becomes more difficult to perform as pregnancy progresses, which may lead to altered biomechanics affecting the musculoskeletal demands on the body segments.<ref name=":9">Sunaga Y, Anan M, Shinkoda K. [https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0003687013000239 Biomechanics of rising from a chair and walking in pregnant women.] Applied Ergonomics [Internet]. 2013 Sep [cited 2021 Nov 27];44(5):792–8.</ref> <ref>Lou S-Z, Chou Y-L, Chou P-H, Lin C-J, Chen U-C, Su F-C. [https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/11240053/ Sit-to-stand at different periods of pregnancy.] Clinical Biomechanics [Internet]. 2001 Mar [cited 2021 Nov 27];16(3):194–8. </ref> Pregnant women may use following temporal-spatial, kinematic and kinetic strategies during the transfer:<ref name=":10">Gilleard W, Crosbie J, Smith R. [https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Wendy-Gilleard-2/publication/5684338_A_longitudinal_study_of_the_effect_of_pregnancy_on_rising_to_stand_from_a_chair/links/5f5082f5299bf13a3199b97a/A-longitudinal-study-of-the-effect-of-pregnancy-on-rising-to-stand-from-a-chair.pdf A longitudinal study of the effect of pregnancy on rising to stand from a chair.] Journal of Biomechanics [Internet]. 2008 Jan [cited 2021 Nov 27];41(4):779–87. </ref>
* Reduction in pre-extension time.
* Increased base of support.
* Decreased hip joint extension velocity.
* Decreased and delayed vertical Ground Reaction Force (GRF)
The biomechanical alterations may have been used to control the momentum which would otherwise be amplified by the increased mass of the trunk. The need to control upright balance at the end of rising to stand is paramount  and subjects will voluntarily limit the propulsive impulse to maintain upright stance under varying conditions.<ref name=":10" /> During rising, pregnant women dampened the propulsion is attributable to increased uterus volume, and they enhanced the forward propulsion at gait initiation. To ensure safe motion, pregnant women should not initiate gait until reaching a stable standing position after rising.<ref name=":9" />
=== Stand-to-Sit during Pregnancy ===
: The physical and physiological changes during pregnancy may necessitate a change in stand-to-sit kinematic performance as follows:<ref>Catena RD, Bailey JP, Campbell N, Music HE. [https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0268003318306922 Stand-to-sit kinematic changes during pregnancy correspond with reduced sagittal plane hip motion.] Clinical Biomechanics [Internet]. 2019 Jul [cited 2021 Nov 27];67:107–14. </ref>
:* Hip and spine motion change for pregnant women performing a sitting task as Hip range of motion and standing angle changed in favor of spine motion.
:* Postural changes related to gestational lordosis affect stand-to-sit changes.
:* Coordination changes away from the hip during the first and last parts of sitting:
:# Joint coordination shifts from hip dominant to spine- and shoulder-dominate coordination just before the start of sitting motion.
:# Hip-knee joint coordination just before seat contact shifts from hip to a knee-dominant motion during pregnancy
=== Discomforts of Pregnancy ===
Pregnant women are often burdened with musculoskeletal symptoms due to the physical, hormonal, and anatomical changes that occur throughout pregnancy. These symptoms are associated with musculoskeletal dysfunctions, modified gait, joint laxity, muscle imbalance, and increased body mass. (1) Musculoskeletal pain experienced by some pregnant women may be related to the increased joint moments associated with the increased mass(2)
* low back pain
* pelvic girdle pain
* leg problems
* urinary incontinence
(Spinal curvature and characteristics of postural change in pregnant women)
=== '''Implications for the Physiotherapist''' ===
As part of their ante-natal care of pregnant women, physiotherapists are concerned to encourage the maintenance of 'good posture'.  Examination of the standard deviations for initial posture and the variety in magnitude and nature of postural changes during pregnancy highlight the importance of the physiotherapist assessing each patient's posture early in the ante-natal program. It is obviously important not only to determine initial postural alignment, but also to evaluate it progressively, so that suitable preventive and therapeutic measures may be taken.
Monitoring of postural changes, using the simple inclinometer or clinometer, together with comprehensive recordings of pain during the ante-natal period could produce important data for further guidance of those concerned with the care of the pregnant woman. The physiotherapist could explore whether the woman's initial posture had a significant influence on the development of particular postural changes during pregnancy, or on the development of pain. The results of the study reported here suggest that further research relating to posture and pain during pregnancy would be justified
'''(The Relationship of Low Back Pain to Postural Changes During Pregnancy)'''


== Resources  ==
== Resources  ==

Revision as of 22:15, 27 November 2021

This article is currently under review and may not be up to date. Please come back soon to see the finished work! (27/11/2021)

Original Editor - User Name

Top Contributors - Areeba Raja and Kim Jackson  

Introduction[edit | edit source]

Pregnancy month by month.gif

Pregnancy, as a natural and physiological process, produces in a woman a series of changes involving the motor system. Weight gain, especially changes within its distribution requires functional adaptation of the musculoskeletal system. These changes make both the posture and gait pattern of pregnant women different from non-pregnant subjects.[1]

The addition of anterior mass on the trunk in a pregnant woman changes the body's center of mass if there is not a concomitant change in posture. Consequently, kinematic adjustments are made to improve stability, allowing safer gait for the pregnant woman, but may be only mechanical in nature. The adjustments do reduce the kinetic effect of the increased mass as total mass normalized moments decrease.[2]

Biomechanical Considerations[edit | edit source]

During pregnancy, a number of biomechanical and hormonal changes occur that can alter spinal curvature, balance, and gait patterns by affecting key areas of the human body. This can greatly impact quality of life (QOL) by increasing back pain and the risk of falls.[3]

The overall postural effect of pregnancy by the final month is as follows:[2][4][5][6][7][8]

  • Anterior tilt of pelvis with hyperextended knees
  • Accentuated lumbar lordosis with a short radius curve
  • Posterior gravity line
  • Hyper kyphosis of the upper thoracic
  • Protracted shoulders
  • Anterior angulation of the cervical region
  • Extension of the occiput on atlas.
  • Associated with these postural changes is a waddling gait pattern.


The video below demonstrates how posture changes as the fetus grows.

Changes in the Spine[edit | edit source]

Low Back Pain in Pregnancy.png
  • Pregnant women with anterior translation of their center of mass have been shown to lack positional adjustment of lumbar lordosis, and the force of gravity, when more distant from the hip, generates a larger hip moment and an unstable upper body.[9]
  • Many pregnant women demonstrate a sway-back posture, whereby the upper trunk is displaced posterior to the lower body causing the center of gravity to shift further backward, and increases the tone of head and neck muscles, causing the head to shift forward to compensate for the change in center of gravity and prevent falling.[9]

Changes in the Knee[edit | edit source]

  • As pregnant women experience an anterior shift in center-of-gravity, their knees hyperextend to maintain balanced, upright posture. Knee hyperextension tenses the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) as it impinges against the femoral notch, which may cause the ACL to adapt and lengthen throughout pregnancy.[10]
  • Knee laxity during pregnancy reaches a constant level before the fifth month of pregnancy, which suggests that laxity increases early in pregnancy; it decreased significantly by about 14% 4 months postpartum.[11]
  • The knee is delicately balanced to maintain stability while also allowing for a wide range-of-motion during activities. Perturbations to this balance, such as those caused by the non-uniform changes in joint laxity which persist following pregnancy, could potentially increase the risk of developing OA and other musculoskeletal disorders in women in their post-reproductive years.[10]

Changes in the Ankle and Foot[edit | edit source]

  • Changes in the biomechanics of feet during pregnancy and puerperium, indicates an increase in circumference measurement and a reduction in plantar arch while the length and width of the foot increases with increased body weight and ligamentous laxity.[12]
  • During pregnancy, forces exerted at the soles of the feet shift from the posterior to the anterior with consequent increases at the forefoot and, more prominently, at the midfoot.[13]
  • Flat feet add stress on the foot and causes inflammation of plantar fascia and increases strain on the feet, calves and sometimes the back.[14]
  • The plantar loading would redistribute as the body weight increase and centre of mass relocate, which is reported to be correlated with foot complaints.[15]

Biomechanical Alterations in Gait[edit | edit source]

Walking is the most essential daily activity for the human body; however, there are many biomechanical changes in gait during pregnancy.[16] Pregnant women altered gait pattern to adapt the weight gain and the shift of centre of gravity. The gait of pregnant women undergoes following modifications:[1][16][17]

Gait Speed[edit | edit source]

Natural locomotion of pregnant women is characterized by slower speed and lower frequency and length of steps, as compared to the pre-pregnancy and postpartum state.[1] Pregnant women tend to avoid the large relative phase between pelvic and thoracic rotations that is typical for high walking velocities, possibly because the moments of inertia of their pelvis and thorax have increased which renders the control of relative phase more critical.[18]

Gait Cycle[edit | edit source]

A significant decrease in the length of the gait cycle is observed in pregnant women. There is an increase in double support time compared to post-partum and nulliparous women. These are fine adjustments that minimize the time on one leg to reduce muscle solicitation. Thus, pregnant women exaggerate transition phases in order to increase the security of gait.

Table below

Spatial and Temporal Parameters of Gait
Stride Length decreases as pregnancy progresses[3][19][20]
Stride Width remains unchanged[19]
Step Length Decreases[21]
Step Width Increases as the pregnancy progresses[20]
Single Support Time Decreases[21]
Double Support Time Increases between trimesters[19][21]
Base of Support Increases
Ground Reaction Force Decrease in late pregnancy.[21][22]
Joint Kinematic Parameters
Sagittal Plane
Pelvis Increase in anterior tilt about 5 degrees
Hip Increase flexion during stance phase[23]
Knee Increase flexion during terminal stance
Ankle Decrease dorsiflexion and plantarflexion
Frontal Plane
Pelvis Increase in pelvic separation width and reduction in the amplitude of the unilateral elevation of the pelvis.
Hip Increase in abduction.
Joint Kinetic Parameters
Sagittal Plane
Hip Significant increase in the hip extensors moment
Knee Significant decrease in the knee extensor moment
Ankle Significant decrease in the ankle plantar flexor moment
Frontal Plane  
Hip Increase in hip abductors moment
Knee Increase in knee adductors moment

Sit-to-Stand during Pregnancy[edit | edit source]

Rising to stand from a chair becomes more difficult to perform as pregnancy progresses, which may lead to altered biomechanics affecting the musculoskeletal demands on the body segments.[24] [25] Pregnant women may use following temporal-spatial, kinematic and kinetic strategies during the transfer:[26]

  • Reduction in pre-extension time.
  • Increased base of support.
  • Decreased hip joint extension velocity.
  • Decreased and delayed vertical Ground Reaction Force (GRF)


The biomechanical alterations may have been used to control the momentum which would otherwise be amplified by the increased mass of the trunk. The need to control upright balance at the end of rising to stand is paramount and subjects will voluntarily limit the propulsive impulse to maintain upright stance under varying conditions.[26] During rising, pregnant women dampened the propulsion is attributable to increased uterus volume, and they enhanced the forward propulsion at gait initiation. To ensure safe motion, pregnant women should not initiate gait until reaching a stable standing position after rising.[24]

Stand-to-Sit during Pregnancy[edit | edit source]

The physical and physiological changes during pregnancy may necessitate a change in stand-to-sit kinematic performance as follows:[27]
  • Hip and spine motion change for pregnant women performing a sitting task as Hip range of motion and standing angle changed in favor of spine motion.
  • Postural changes related to gestational lordosis affect stand-to-sit changes.
  • Coordination changes away from the hip during the first and last parts of sitting:
  1. Joint coordination shifts from hip dominant to spine- and shoulder-dominate coordination just before the start of sitting motion.
  2. Hip-knee joint coordination just before seat contact shifts from hip to a knee-dominant motion during pregnancy

Discomforts of Pregnancy[edit | edit source]

Pregnant women are often burdened with musculoskeletal symptoms due to the physical, hormonal, and anatomical changes that occur throughout pregnancy. These symptoms are associated with musculoskeletal dysfunctions, modified gait, joint laxity, muscle imbalance, and increased body mass. (1) Musculoskeletal pain experienced by some pregnant women may be related to the increased joint moments associated with the increased mass(2)

  • low back pain
  • pelvic girdle pain
  • leg problems
  • urinary incontinence

(Spinal curvature and characteristics of postural change in pregnant women)

Implications for the Physiotherapist[edit | edit source]

As part of their ante-natal care of pregnant women, physiotherapists are concerned to encourage the maintenance of 'good posture'. Examination of the standard deviations for initial posture and the variety in magnitude and nature of postural changes during pregnancy highlight the importance of the physiotherapist assessing each patient's posture early in the ante-natal program. It is obviously important not only to determine initial postural alignment, but also to evaluate it progressively, so that suitable preventive and therapeutic measures may be taken.

Monitoring of postural changes, using the simple inclinometer or clinometer, together with comprehensive recordings of pain during the ante-natal period could produce important data for further guidance of those concerned with the care of the pregnant woman. The physiotherapist could explore whether the woman's initial posture had a significant influence on the development of particular postural changes during pregnancy, or on the development of pain. The results of the study reported here suggest that further research relating to posture and pain during pregnancy would be justified

(The Relationship of Low Back Pain to Postural Changes During Pregnancy)

Resources[edit | edit source]

  • bulleted list
  • x

or

  1. numbered list
  2. x

References[edit | edit source]

  1. 1.0 1.1 1.2 Forczek W;Staszkiewicz R. Changes of kinematic gait parameters due to pregnancy. Acta of bioengineering and biomechanics [Internet]. 2012 [cited 2021 Nov 25];14(4).
  2. 2.0 2.1 Ogamba MI, Loverro KL, Laudicina NM, Gill SV, Lewis CL. Changes in Gait with Anteriorly Added Mass: A Pregnancy Simulation Study. Journal of Applied Biomechanics [Internet]. 2016 Aug [cited 2021 Nov 21];32(4):379–87.
  3. 3.0 3.1 Conder R, Zamani R, Akrami M. The Biomechanics of Pregnancy: A Systematic Review. Journal of Functional Morphology and Kinesiology [Internet]. 2019 Dec 2 [cited 2021 Nov 25];4(4):72.
  4. Fligg DB. Biomechanical and treatment considerations for the pregnant patient. The Journal of the Canadian Chiropractic Association [Internet]. 1986 [cited 2021 Nov 25];30(3):145–7.
  5. Yoo H, Shin D, Song C. Changes in the spinal curvature, degree of pain, balance ability, and gait ability according to pregnancy period in pregnant and nonpregnant women. Journal of Physical Therapy Science [Internet]. 2015 [cited 2021 Nov 25];27(1):279–84.
  6. Petrocco-Napuli K. Pregnancy and the Impact on the Lower Extremity [Internet]. [cited 2021 Nov 21].
  7. Franklin ME, Conner-Kerr T. An Analysis of Posture and Back Pain in the First and Third Trimesters of Pregnancy. Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy [Internet]. 1998 Sep [cited 2021 Nov 25];28(3):133–8.
  8. Gilleard WL, Crosbie J, Smith R. Static trunk posture in sitting and standing during pregnancy and early postpartum. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation [Internet]. 2002 Dec [cited 2021 Nov 27];83(12):1739–44.
  9. 9.0 9.1 OKANISHI N, KITO N, AKIYAMA M, YAMAMOTO M. Spinal curvature and characteristics of postural change in pregnant women. Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica [Internet]. 2012 Jun 18 [cited 2021 Nov 25];91(7):856–61.
  10. 10.0 10.1 Chu SR, Boyer EH, Beynnon B, Segal NA. Pregnancy Results in Lasting Changes in Knee Joint Laxity. PM&R [Internet]. 2019 Feb [cited 2021 Nov 25];11(2):117–24.
  11. Dumas GA, Reid JG. Laxity of Knee Cruciate Ligaments During Pregnancy. Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy [Internet]. 1997 Jul [cited 2021 Nov 25];26(1):2–6.
  12. Wittkopf PG, Kretzer J, Borges DM, Santos GM, Sperandio FF. Características biomecânicas dos pés no período gravídico-puerperal: estudo de caso. Scientia Medica [Internet]. 2015 Jun 10 [cited 2021 Nov 25];25(1):19688.
  13. VAROL T, GÖKER A, CEZAYİRLİ E, ÖZGÜR S, TUÇ YÜCEL A. Relation between foot pain and plantar pressure in pregnancy. TURKISH JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCES [Internet]. 2017 [cited 2021 Nov 25];47:1104–8. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29154449/
  14. Ghait AS, Elhosary EA, Abogazya AA. Assessment of Foot Biomechanics through Measuring of the Plantar Pressure during the Last Trimester of Pregnancy. Journal of Advances in Medicine and Medical Research [Internet]. 2018 Sep 20 [cited 2021 Nov 25];27(7):1–6.
  15. Mei Q, Gu Y, Fernandez J. Alterations of Pregnant Gait during Pregnancy and Post-Partum. Scientific Reports [Internet]. 2018 Feb 2 [cited 2021 Nov 27];8(1).
  16. 16.0 16.1 Zhang Y, Lu H, Yaodong Gu, Nanzhi Hu. Characteristics of the centre of pressure progression for pregnant women during walking [Internet]. ResearchGate. Inderscience; 2015 [cited 2021 Nov 26].
  17. Bertuit J;Leyh C;Rooze M;Feipe V. Pregnancy-related changes in center of pressure during gait. Acta of bioengineering and biomechanics [Internet]. 2017 [cited 2021 Nov 26];19(4).
  18. Wu W, Meijer OG, Lamoth CJC, Uegaki K, van Dieën JH, Wuisman PIJM, et al. Gait coordination in pregnancy: transverse pelvic and thoracic rotations and their relative phase. Clinical Biomechanics [Internet]. 2004 Jun [cited 2021 Nov 27];19(5):480–8.
  19. 19.0 19.1 19.2 Branco M, Santos-Rocha R, Aguiar L, Vieira F, Veloso A. Kinematic Analysis of Gait in the Second and Third Trimesters of Pregnancy. Journal of Pregnancy [Internet]. 2013 [cited 2021 Nov 27];2013:1–9.
  20. 20.0 20.1 Gilleard WL. Trunk motion and gait characteristics of pregnant women when walking: report of a longitudinal study with a control group. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth [Internet]. 2013 Mar 20 [cited 2021 Nov 27];13(1).
  21. 21.0 21.1 21.2 21.3 Błaszczyk JW, Opala-Berdzik A, Plewa M. Adaptive changes in spatiotemporal gait characteristics in women during pregnancy. Gait & Posture [Internet]. 2016 Jan [cited 2021 Nov 27];43:160–4.
  22. Gimunova M, Kasović M, Zvonar M, Damir Knjaz. Analysis of ground reaction force in gait during different phases of pregnancy [Internet]. ResearchGate. unknown; 2015 [cited 2021 Nov 27].
  23. Catena RD, Bailey JP, Campbell N, Stewart BC, Marion SJ. Correlations between joint kinematics and dynamic balance control during gait in pregnancy. Gait & Posture [Internet]. 2020 Jul [cited 2021 Nov 27];80:106–12.
  24. 24.0 24.1 Sunaga Y, Anan M, Shinkoda K. Biomechanics of rising from a chair and walking in pregnant women. Applied Ergonomics [Internet]. 2013 Sep [cited 2021 Nov 27];44(5):792–8.
  25. Lou S-Z, Chou Y-L, Chou P-H, Lin C-J, Chen U-C, Su F-C. Sit-to-stand at different periods of pregnancy. Clinical Biomechanics [Internet]. 2001 Mar [cited 2021 Nov 27];16(3):194–8.
  26. 26.0 26.1 Gilleard W, Crosbie J, Smith R. A longitudinal study of the effect of pregnancy on rising to stand from a chair. Journal of Biomechanics [Internet]. 2008 Jan [cited 2021 Nov 27];41(4):779–87.
  27. Catena RD, Bailey JP, Campbell N, Music HE. Stand-to-sit kinematic changes during pregnancy correspond with reduced sagittal plane hip motion. Clinical Biomechanics [Internet]. 2019 Jul [cited 2021 Nov 27];67:107–14.